Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2502.02176

MAISTEP -- a new grid-based machine learning tool for inferring stellar parameters I. Ages of giant-planet host stars

Juma Kamulali·Benard Nsamba·Vardan Adibekyan·Achim Weiss·Tiago L. Campante·Nuno C. Santos
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Our understanding of exoplanet demographics partly depends on their corresponding host star parameters. With the majority of exoplanet-host stars having only atmospheric constraints available, robust inference of their parameters is susceptible to the approach used. The goal of this work is to develop a grid-based machine learning tool capable of determining the stellar radius, mass, and age using only atmospheric constraints and to analyse the age distribution of stars hosting giant planets. Our machine learning approach involves combining four tree-based machine learning algorithms (Random Forest, Extra Trees, Extreme Gradient Boosting, and CatBoost) trained on a grid of stellar models to infer stellar radius, mass, and age using Teff, [Fe/H], and luminosities. We perform a detailed statistical analysis to compare the inferences of our tool with those based on seismic data from the APOKASC and LEGACY samples. Finally, we apply our tool to determine the ages of stars hosting giant planets. Comparing the stellar parameter inferences from our machine learning tool with those from the APOKASC and LEGACY, we find a bias (and a scatter) of -0.5\% (5\%) and -0.2\% (2\%) in radius, 6\% (5\%) per cent and -2\% (3\%) in mass, and -9\% (16\%) and 7\% (23\%) in age, respectively. Therefore, our machine learning predictions are commensurate with seismic inferences. When applying our model to a sample of stars hosting Jupiter-mass planets, we find the average age estimates for the hosts of Hot Jupiters, Warm Jupiters, and Cold Jupiters to be 1.98, 2.98, and 3.51 Gyr, respectively. These statistical ages of the host stars confirm previous predictions - based on stellar model ages for a relatively small number of hosts, as well as on the average age-velocity dispersion relation - that stars hosting Hot Jupiters are statistically younger than those hosting Warm and Cold Jupiters.

Explore related subjects

astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Juma Kamulali, Benard Nsamba, Vardan Adibekyan, Achim Weiss, Tiago L. Campante, Nuno C. Santos. 2025-02-04. MAISTEP -- a new grid-based machine learning tool for inferring stellar parameters I. Ages of giant-planet host stars. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361%2F202453268

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

The Payne Zero Project I: Stellar Spectra from Physical Models in Seconds

Modern stellar surveys measure millions of spectra, yet one self-consistent atmosphere and spectrum can require tens of minutes. This cost has motivated grids, spectral emulators, and data-driven models. We present Payne Zero, which reorganizes one-dimensional LTE Kurucz calculations for GPU-native synthesis and multicore atmosphere iteration, and validate it against the original Fortran programs. A 300-1000 nm solar spectrum sampled at a grid resolution of R = 300,000 takes about 14 s on an NVIDIA H100 GPU, while the APOGEE 1500-1700 nm interval takes about 1 s. Physical atmosphere iterations take 2-5 s on 16 AMD CPU threads, and learned initializers reduce the iterations required for convergence. Final spectra remain in practical parity across the tested dwarf and giant regimes. These speeds place direct synthesis inside an optimizer without a label-to-flux spectral emulator. We demonstrate direct many-element fitting of reduced APOGEE spectra and recover multi-element abundance trends broadly consistent with the survey catalog. GPU-resident velocity shifts, broadening, line-spread-function convolution, and detector sampling add negligible cost relative to synthesis. The direct-synthesis search takes less than one minute per star on an H100, while atmosphere verification runs independently on multicore CPUs. The same computational graph calibrates more than 100,000 oscillator-strength and damping corrections jointly against the Sun and Arcturus in about one minute on an H100. Payne Zero therefore brings direct physical fitting and atomic-data calibration to survey scale. The code is available at https://github.com/tingyuansen/payne-zero.

astro-ph.SR↗
arXiv2026

Host-star metallicities and kinematics of directly imaged brown-dwarf companions

Brown dwarfs are common as free-floating objects but rare as close companions to Sun-like stars, a disparity known as the "brown-dwarf desert". Host-star metallicity can constrain whether these companions form mainly through metal-sensitive core accretion or through less metal-dependent disc or cloud fragmentation. We extend our homogeneous spectroscopic analysis of directly imaged planet hosts into the brown-dwarf regime and compare their metallicities with those of planet hosts and close-in brown-dwarf hosts. We compiled 54 unique directly imaged brown-dwarf systems selected over an inclusive 13-80 M_Jup interval and projected separations from about 5 au to several thousand au. Objects near the model-dependent 70-75 M_Jup hydrogen-burning boundary may instead be very-low-mass stars. For 31 hosts with archival high-resolution spectra, we derived atmospheric parameters and metallicities using Bayesian spectral synthesis. Literature companion masses and projected separations are heterogeneous and are used only for demographic context. Galactic velocities were calculated for 46 hosts solely to characterise the youth-biased imaging sample. The host stars have a broadly solar metallicity distribution, with a median [Fe/H] of +0.06 dex and a median absolute deviation of 0.11 dex, and show no strong metal-rich bias. No statistically significant metallicity difference is detected between the lower- and higher-mass directly imaged subsamples. The hosts are kinematically cold, as expected from the youth-biased selection of direct-imaging surveys. The absence of a strong metal-rich bias suggests that classical core accretion does not dominate the wide-orbit brown-dwarf population. Disc instability and cloud fragmentation remain plausible, but the current sample and heterogeneous companion properties do not permit object-by-object discrimination between these channels.

astro-ph.SR↗
arXiv2026

Stability Analysis of the Proton Hammerhead Distribution Observed by Parker Solar Probe: Linear Theory and Fully Kinetic Simulations under Idealised Conditions

The non-adiabatic heating of the slow Solar Wind (SW) remains an open problem, with wave--particle interactions as a primary candidate mechanism. Novel in situ Parker Solar Probe (PSP) observations reveal strongly perpendicular anisotropic velocity distribution functions (VDFs), called "hammerhead", correlated with intense wave activity. These VDFs are systematically measured at the Heliospheric Current Sheet (HCS), making the hammerhead an important kinetic signature of the slow SW. In this work, we employ a fully kinetic particle-in-cell approach, complemented by a linear Vlasov solver to cross-validate the simulation results, to investigate the stability of these VDFs, the timescales over which they evolve, and their interaction with plasma waves. Our main findings indicate that the hammerhead distribution is primarily susceptible to drift-type instabilities, while energy is nonlinearly transferred back to the plasma through a combination of Landau and cyclotron resonances, resulting in net heating in the parallel direction, preferentially energizing the beam proton population. Crucially, these nonlinear interactions do not drastically alter the morphology of the distribution. This suggests the possibility that the hammerhead may be generated locally within the HCS in the inner heliosphere and subsequently advected outward, where it is eventually measured by PSP. This work lays the ground for future investigations into the kinetic physics of the HCS.

astro-ph.SR↗