Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2502.02455

A note on Ordered Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi graphs

Kevin Pratt
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A recent breakthrough of Behnezhad and Ghafari [FOCS 2024] and subsequent work of Assadi, Khanna, and Kiss [SODA 2025] gave algorithms for the fully dynamic $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximate maximum matching problem whose runtimes are determined by a purely combinatorial quantity: the maximum density of Ordered Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi (ORS) graphs. We say a graph $G$ is an $(r,t)$-ORS graph if its edges can be partitioned into $t$ matchings $M_1,M_2, \ldots, M_t$ each of size $r$, such that for every $i$, $M_i$ is an induced matching in the subgraph $M_{i} \cup M_{i+1} \cup \cdots \cup M_t$. This is a relaxation of the extensively-studied notion of a Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi (RS) graph, the difference being that in an RS graph each $M_i$ must be an induced matching in $G$. In this note, we show that these two notions are roughly equivalent. Specifically, let $\mathrm{ORS}(n)$ be the largest $t$ such that there exists an $n$-vertex ORS-$(\Omega(n), t)$ graph, and define $\mathrm{RS}(n)$ analogously. We show that if $\mathrm{ORS}(n) \ge \Omega(n^c)$, then for any fixed $\delta > 0$, $\mathrm{RS}(n) \ge \Omega(n^{c(1-\delta)})$. This resolves a question of Behnezhad and Ghafari.

Explore related subjects

cs.DSmath.CO

Keep this discovery

BibTeXRIS

Kevin Pratt. 2025-02-04. A note on Ordered Ruzsa-Szemer\'edi graphs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.02455

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Quasi-Monte Carlo Beyond Hardy-Krause II: $(1 + \varepsilon)n$ Samples Suffice

Numerical integration studies how well one can estimate the integral of a function $f$ over $[0,1)^d$ using $n$ sample points. The two classical methods, Monte Carlo (MC) and quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC), have complementary strengths and weaknesses, and a fundamental question is to design an approach that combines the benefits of both. Recently, building on the transference principle in discrepancy theory, Bansal and Jiang~\cite{BJ25a} gave a randomized QMC method that bridges MC and QMC guarantees using only i.i.d.\ samples. Their method also goes beyond the classical Koksma--Hlawka inequality: it achieves integration error $\widetilde{O}_d(\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)/n)$, where the smoothed-out variation $\sigma_{\mathsf{SO}}(f)$ can be substantially smaller than the Hardy--Krause variation that governs the classical bound. However, their algorithm requires $n^2$ i.i.d.\ samples as input, and this quadratic blowup is inherent to any method based on the transference principle. In this work, we bypass the quadratic blowup: for any constant $\varepsilon > 0$, we show that $(1+\varepsilon)n$ i.i.d.\ samples suffice to both obtain the beyond-Hardy--Krause guarantee of~\cite{BJ25a}, resolving an open problem posed there, and to produce low-discrepancy point sequences. Our algorithms are variants of the online Haar-thinning method of Dwivedi, Feldheim, Gurel-Gurevich, and Ramdas~\cite{DFG+19}.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Single-Exponential Algorithms and a Polynomial Kernel for Strong Connectivity Augmentation

Strong Connectivity Augmentation (SCA) asks whether a directed acyclic graph can be made strongly connected by adding at most $k$ prescribed links whose total weight is within a given budget. Klinkby, Misra, and Saurabh (SODA 2021) gave an $O^*(2^{O(k\log k)})$-time algorithm and asked whether the problem admits a single-exponential parameterized algorithm and a polynomial kernel. We answer both questions affirmatively: SCA can be solved in $O^*(9^k)$ time and admits a polynomial kernel with $O(k^4)$ vertices and $O(k^{16})$ bits. For unweighted SCA, we obtain $O^*(4^k)$ time and a kernel with $O(k^3)$ vertices. Our algorithms are based on a particularly simple reduction to Strongly Connected Spanning Subgraph with two edge costs.

cs.DS↗