Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2502.07044

The Future of Work and Capital: Analyzing AGI in a CES Production Model

Abstract

The integration of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) into economic production represents a transformative shift with profound implications for labor markets, income distribution, and technological growth. This study extends the Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) production function to incorporate AGI-driven labor and capital alongside traditional inputs, providing a comprehensive framework for analyzing AGI's economic impact. Four key models emerge from this framework. First, we examine the substitution and complementarity between AGI labor and human labor, identifying conditions under which AGI augments or displaces human workers. Second, we analyze how AGI capital accumulation influences wage structures and income distribution, highlighting potential disruptions to labor-based earnings. Third, we explore long-run equilibrium dynamics, demonstrating how an economy dominated by AGI capital may lead to the collapse of human wages and necessitate redistributive mechanisms. Finally, we assess the impact of AGI on total factor productivity, showing that technological growth depends on whether AGI serves as a complement to or a substitute for human labor. Our findings underscore the urgent need for policy interventions to ensure economic stability and equitable wealth distribution in an AGI-driven economy. Without appropriate regulatory measures, rising inequality and weakened aggregate demand could lead to economic stagnation despite technological advancements. Moreover this research suggests a renegoation of the Social Contract.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pascal Stiefenhofer. 2025-02-10. The Future of Work and Capital: Analyzing AGI in a CES Production Model. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07044

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Computing Endogenous Transformations in Processing Networks: A Dynamic Calibration Approach

Understanding how supply chains endogenously transform requires a parametric model of processing networks with non-neutral substitution elasticities. While the Cascaded CES production function provides a rigorous framework, dynamically calibrating its structural parameters from time-series data constitutes a highly non-convex inverse optimization problem. Since enforcing strict microeconomic concavity renders standard monolithic approaches computationally intractable, we propose a novel structure-exploiting algorithm to bypass this limitation. By leveraging the physical upstreamness topology of the network, our hybrid heuristic effectively breaks the curse of dimensionality inherent in economywide processing networks. Applying this framework to U.S. time-series data, we provide a scalable computational engine to fully endogenize complex supply-chain transformations, ultimately uncovering the elastic origins of asymmetric macroeconomic tail risks.

econ.GN

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Screening Out the Needy: The Effects of SNAP Work Requirements

We examine the effectiveness of work requirements as a screening device in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Work requirements for "able-bodied adults without dependents" were suspended after the Great Recession and gradually reinstated across counties and states in the 2010s. Using linked administrative SNAP and employment data from five states and a triple-differences design, we find that work requirements reduce SNAP participation by seven percent without increasing labor supply and disproportionately screen out low-income individuals. We develop a welfare framework to interpret these results and find that the social costs of work requirements exceed budget savings.

econ.GN