Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2502.07948

The nature of mathematical models

Abstract

Modeling has become a widespread, useful tool in mathematics applied to diverse fields, from physics to economics to biomedicine. Practitioners of modeling may use algebraic or differential equations, to the elements of which they attribute an intuitive relationship with some relevant aspect of reality they wish to represent. More sophisticated expressions may include stochasticity, either as observation error or system noise. However, a clear, unambiguous mathematical definition of what a model is and of what is the relationship between the model and the real-life phenomena it purports to represent has so far not been formulated. The present work aims to fill this gap, motivating the definition of a mathematical model as an operator on a Hilbert space of random variables, identifying the experimental realization as the map between the theoretical space of model construction and the computational space of statistical model identification, and tracing the relationship of the geometry of the model manifold in the abstract setting with the corresponding geometry of the prediction surfaces in statistical estimation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Andrea De Gaetano. 2025-11-06. The nature of mathematical models. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.07948

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

See You at the Posterior Line: Learning Bayesian Modeling Through a Car Racing Game

We present an interactive classroom activity designed to address a central challenge in teaching introductory Bayesian statistics: how to formalize subjective knowledge and available information into prior distributions and then update them with empirical data. Role-playing as data analysts for a racing team, students evaluate candidate tires by converting qualitative engineering reports into prior distributions, collecting primary data via a virtual racing game, and using a Beta-Binomial model to inform team strategy. This discovery-based exercise allows small groups to observe directly how different prior choices and sample data jointly shape posterior inference. Student feedback ($n=32$) highlights high enjoyment, engagement and improved conceptual clarity. Open-access materials to implement the activity are provided, alongside recommendations for adapting it to other teaching contexts.

stat.OT

Why is Regularization Underused? An Empirical Study on Trust and Adoption of Statistical Methods

Statistical practice does not automatically follow methodological innovation. Regularization methods, widely advocated to reduce overfitting and stabilize inference, are readily available in modern software, but are not consistently used by data analysts. We investigate this implementation gap in a large-scale empirical study of trust in, and acceptance of, regularization techniques, based on $N = 606$ data analysts. Drawing on measurement frameworks from technology acceptance research, we survey practitioners and embed a randomized experiment to test whether written recommendation of regularization methods increases trust or intended use. We find no evidence of such an effect. Instead, adoption intentions are strongly associated with analysts' perceptions of ease of implementation and practical benefit, such as improved bias control or interpretability. Perceived social norms also emerge as a central driver. These results indicate that uptake of statistical methodology depends less on formal recommendations than on usability, perceived utility, and community practice.

stat.OT

Exact analysis of a split--merge queue with latent Erlang-factor dependent subtask times

This paper studies a two-server split--merge queue with positively dependent subtask service times modeled through a latent-factor bivariate Erlang construction. An exact characterization of the split--merge completion time is obtained, including explicit formulas for its first two moments and the resulting mean waiting time. Under fixed marginal service-time distributions, independence is shown to stochastically increase the completion time and hence overestimate mean waiting time. Numerical illustrations show that this benchmark gap can be substantial.

stat.OT