Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2502.09413

Analysis of harmonic average method for interface problems with discontinuous solutions and fluxes

Kejia Pan·Hengrui Xu·Zhilin Li
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Harmonic average method has been widely utilized to deal with heterogeneous coefficients in solving differential equations. One remarkable advantage of the harmonic averaging method is that no derivative of the coefficient is needed. Furthermore, the coefficient matrix of the finite difference equations is an M-matrix which guarantees the stability of the algorithm. It has been numerically observed but not theoretically proved that the method produces second order pointwise accuracy when the solution and flux are continuous even if the coefficient has finite discontinuities for which the method is inconsistent ($O(1)$ in the local truncation errors). It has been believed that there are some fortunate error cancellations. The harmonic average method does not converge when the solution or the flux has finite discontinuities. In this paper, not only we rigorously prove the second order convergence of the harmonic averaging method for one-dimensional interface problem when the coefficient has a finite discontinuities and the solution and the flux are continuous, but also proposed an {\em improved harmonic average method} that is also second order accurate (in the $L^{\infty}$ norm), which allows discontinuous solutions and fluxes along with the discontinuous coefficients. The key in the convergence proof is the construction of the Green's function. The proof shows how the error cancellations occur in a subtle way. Numerical experiments in both 1D and 2D confirmed the theoretical proof of the improved harmonic average method.

Explore related subjects

math.NAcs.NA

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Kejia Pan, Hengrui Xu, Zhilin Li. 2025-02-14. Analysis of harmonic average method for interface problems with discontinuous solutions and fluxes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09413

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How many continuous measurements are needed to learn a vector?

One can recover vectors from $\mathbb{R}^m$ with arbitrary precision, using only $\lceil \log_2(m)\rceil +1$ continuous measurements that are chosen adaptively. This surprising result is explained and discussed, and we present applications to infinite-dimensional approximation problems.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

IterativeCUR: Large Rank-Adaptive Approximation From a Small Recycled Sketch

The computation of accurate low-rank matrix approximations is central to improving the scalability of various techniques in machine learning, uncertainty quantification, and control. Traditionally, low-rank approximations are constructed using SVD-based approaches such as truncated SVD or Randomized SVD. Although these SVD approaches---especially Randomized SVD---have proven to be very computationally efficient, other low-rank approximation methods can offer even greater performance. One such approach is the CUR decomposition, which forms a low-rank approximation using direct row and column subsets of a matrix. Because CUR uses direct matrix subsets, it is also often better able to preserve native matrix structures like sparsity or non-negativity than SVD-based approaches and can facilitate data interpretation in many contexts. This paper introduces IterativeCUR, which draws on previous work in randomized numerical linear algebra to build a new algorithm that is highly competitive compared to prior work. IterativeCUR is adaptive in the sense that it takes as an input parameter the desired tolerance $ε$ and outputs (with arbitrarily high probability) an approximation of error bounded by $ε$, rather than requiring an a priori guess of the numerical rank. IterativeCUR typically runs significantly faster than both existing CUR algorithms and techniques such as Randomized SVD. Its asymptotic complexity is $\mathcal{O}(mn + (m+n)r^2)$ for an $m\times n$ matrix of output rank $r$. IterativeCUR relies on a single small sketch from the matrix that is successively downdated as the algorithm proceeds. We demonstrate through extensive experiments that IterativeCUR achieves up to $4\times$ speed-up over state-of-the-art pivoting-on-sketch approaches with no loss of accuracy, and up to $40\times$ speed-up over rank-adaptive randomized SVD approaches.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

Multigrid with Linear Storage Complexity

As the discretization error for the solution of a partial differential equation (PDE) decreases, the precision required to store the corresponding coefficients naturally increases. Storing the solution's finite element coefficients explicitly requires $\mathcal O(n \log n)$ bits of storage, where $n$ is the number of degrees of freedom (DoFs). This paper presents a full multigrid method to compute the solution in a compressed format that reduces the storage complexity of the solution and intermediate vectors to $\mathcal O(n)$ bits. This reduction allows a matrix-free implementation to solve elliptic PDEs with an overall linear space complexity. For problems limited by the memory capacity of current supercomputers, we expect a memory footprint reduction of about an order of magnitude compared to state-of-the-art mixed-precision methods. We demonstrate the applicability of our algorithm by solving two model problems. Depending on the PDE and polynomial degree, but irrespective of the problem size, the solution vector on the finest grid requires between 4 and 12 bits per DoF, and the residual and correction require 3 to 6 bits each. Additional data is stored on the coarse grids with modestly increasing bit widths toward coarser grids.

math.NA↗