Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2502.09959

Integrally Hilbertian rings and the polynomial Schinzel hypothesis

Abstract

The classical Hilbert specialization property is a field-theoretic tool ensuring that polynomial irreducibility over a field is preserved under specialization of some of the variables. We develop an integral counterpart by introducing the notion of {integrally Hilbertian rings}, where specialization takes place inside a ring and irreducibility is required over the ring. A core part shows how new obstacles to irreducibility such as coefficient divisors or fixed divisors can be dealt with over Krull domains, a large class of rings including UFDs, Dedekind domains, etc. As a result, we obtain a general criterion for integral hilbertianity, along with many examples, \hbox{e.g.} all rings of integers of number fields. Polynomial rings over arbitrary domains are other examples. As an application, we prove a polynomial variant of the Schinzel Hypothesis on prime values of polynomials with integer coefficients: if $\mathcal{Z}$ is an integrally Hilbertian ring, the hypothesis becomes a true statement if the ring of integers ${\mathbb Z}$ is replaced by the polynomial ring $\mathcal{Z}[U]$ and ``prime'' by ``irreducible''. This result generalizes previous works and fits in a unified framework for Schinzel-type phenomena that we introduce. We further obtain an additional conclusion that has some noteworthy consequences for the classical Schinzel Hypothesis itself.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Angelot Behajaina, Pierre Dèbes, Joachim König. 2026-04-08. Integrally Hilbertian rings and the polynomial Schinzel hypothesis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.09959

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Real quadratic base changes for $\mathrm{GL}_3$ and integral periods relations

We prove a $p$-adic divisibility between the automorphic periods of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $\mathrm{GL}_3(\mathbb{Q})$ and the periods of its Arthur-Clozel's base change to some real quadratic field $E$. This generalizes earlier works of Tilouine-Urban and of Hida in the case of classical modular forms. The divisibility we prove involves a new kind of automorphic periods, defined using the middle degree of the cuspidal cohomology of $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$, instead of the top or bottom degrees. We also investigate the Rogawski's stable base change from the quasi-split unitary group $U_E$ associated with $E$ to $\mathrm{GL}_3(E)$. In this situation, we also obtain some results toward a $p$-adic divisibility of automorphic periods.

math.NT