Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2502.17242

An Intermediate Logic Contained in Medvedev's Logic with Disjunction Property

Abstract

Let $\textbf{SU}$ be the superintuitionistic logic defined by the axiom $\boldsymbol{su} = ((\neg p\to q)\land(\neg q\to p) \rightarrow r \vee s) \to ( p \rightarrow r) \vee(q \rightarrow s)$, or equivalently, by Andrew's axiom. It is easy to check that $\textbf{SU}$ is contained in Medvedev's logic and contains both Kreisel-Putnam logic and Scott logic. We show that on \textbf{S4} frames, $\boldsymbol{su}$ corresponds to a certain first-order property, called the ``strong union'' property. The strong completeness of \textbf{SU}, with respect to the class of \textbf{S4} frames enjoying this property, is proved. Furthermore, we demonstrate that \textbf{SU} has the disjunction property. As a result, \textbf{SU} stands as the strongest logic currently known below Medvedev's logic that has both an axiomatization and the disjunction property.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhicheng Chen. 2025-03-17. An Intermediate Logic Contained in Medvedev's Logic with Disjunction Property. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17242

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bluebirds and mockingbirds cannot produce a fixed-point combinator

Let $B$ be the bluebird combinator with reduction rule $Bxyz \to_{w} x\left(yz\right)$, let $M$ be the mockingbird combinator with reduction rule $Mx \to_{w} xx$, and let $I$ be the identity bird combinator with reduction rule $Ix \to_{w} x$. A fixed-point combinator, called a sage bird by Smullyan, is a closed term $Y$ such that, for a fresh variable $x$, $Yx$ is equivalent to $x\left(Yx\right)$ under these reduction rules. For a fixed variable $x$, we construct an invariant $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(u\right)$ of a $BMI$-term $u$ with respect to $\to_{w}$. This invariant traces the occurrences of $x$ in the leftmost-innermost reduction sequence of $u$. We then prove that $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(Yx\right) \neq \mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(x^{r}\left( Yx \right)\right)$ for every $x$-free $BMI$-term $Y$ and every $r\geq 1$. Consequently, there exists no fixed-point combinator in $BMI$-combinatory logic. This provides a negative answer to the problem posed by Smullyan in 1985.

math.LO

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Compactness via Consistency Properties

We will use consistency properties to characterize strongly compact cardinals, first showing an adequate Model Existence Theorem for larger fragments.

math.LO