Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2502.17915

Dynamic Factor Model-Based Multiperiod Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Portfolio Constraints

Abstract

Motivated by practical applications, we explore the constrained multi-period mean-variance portfolio selection problem within a market characterized by a dynamic factor model. This model captures predictability in asset returns driven by state variables and incorporates cone-type portfolio constraints that are crucial in practice. The model is broad enough to encompass various dynamic factor frameworks, including practical considerations such as no-short-selling and cardinality constraints. We derive a semi-analytical optimal solution using dynamic programming, revealing it as a piecewise linear feedback policy to wealth, with all factors embedded within the allocation vectors. Additionally, we demonstrate that the portfolio policies are determined by two specific stochastic processes resulting from the stochastic optimizations, for which we provide detailed algorithms. These processes reflect the investor's assessment of future investment opportunities and play a crucial role in characterizing the time consistency and efficiency of the optimal policy through the variance-optimal signed supermartingale measure of the market. We present numerical examples that illustrate the model's application in various settings. Using real market data, we investigate how the factors influence portfolio policies and demonstrate that incorporating the factor structure may enhance out-of-sample performance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jianjun Gao, Chengneng Jin, Yun Shi, Xiangyu Cui. 2025-02-25. Dynamic Factor Model-Based Multiperiod Mean-Variance Portfolio Selection with Portfolio Constraints. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.17915

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Financially Guided Deep Portfolio Optimization

Portfolio optimization in real-world financial markets is notoriously difficult due to non-stationarity, noisy data, and high transaction costs. Standard predict-then-optimize methods first forecast returns and then solve for weights, compounding prediction errors and often failing under regime shifts. We propose an end-to-end framework that directly optimizes differentiable surrogates of key financial metrics (Sharpe ratio, Omega ratio, Conditional Value-at-Risk, and risk parity), allowing neural networks to learn portfolio weights via backpropagation. Our expanding-window walk-forward procedure, applied to 50 S&P 500 stocks from 2007 to 2023, incorporates realistic bid-ask spread costs and rebalances quarterly. On the challenging out-of-sample test period (2022-2023), the best model, an AttentionLSTM with the Omega-CVaR-RiskParity loss, achieves an annualized Sharpe of 0.29 and a total compounded return of +7.86%, while the S&P 500 delivers -4.52% total compounded return and an annualized Sharpe of -0.02. This outperforms the S&P 500 by 12.38 percentage points, while keeping tail risk (CVaR) nearly unchanged. The framework outperforms the equal-weight portfolio, S&P 500, and traditional methods (MVP, HRP, NCO, ERC), demonstrating that embedding financial objectives directly into model training yields robust, economically meaningful outperformance even in adverse market conditions.

q-fin.PM

The geometry of higher order modern portfolio theory

In this article, we study the generalized modern portfolio theory, with utility functions admitting higher-order cumulants. We establish that under certain genericity conditions, the utility function has a constant number of complex critical points. We study the discriminant locus of complex critical points with multiplicity. Finally, we switch our attention to the generalization of the feasible portfolio set (variety), determine its dimension, and give a formula for its degree.

q-fin.PM

Special Markowitz: Thermodynamic Formalism for the Joint Regularisation of Returns and Covariance

Special Markowitz (SM) regularises returns and covariance jointly, relative to a reference state (mu_ref, Sigma_ref). Each eigendirection of the whitened relative operator carries a signed spectral potential Phi_k, with persistence factor psi_k = exp(-Phi_k) > 0. Positive potentials attenuate empirical deviations from the reference geometry, zero potential preserves them, and negative potentials amplify them. The persistence factor psi_k governs both the return signal and the covariance deviation: the regularised deviation from the reference is psi_k times the empirical deviation. The logarithmic potential coordinate is characterised by a multiplicative composition law on the multiplicative group of positive real numbers; the Stein loss is characterised as the unique free-energy density (within a natural class) compatible with the resulting coupling. The SM pressure functional is additive across modes the defining property of Special Markowitz.

q-fin.PM