Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2503.00281

An FPT Constant-Factor Approximation Algorithm for Correlation Clustering

Jianqi Zhou·Zhongyi Zhang·Jiong Guo
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The Correlation Clustering problem is one of the most extensively studied clustering formulations due to its wide applications in machine learning, data mining, computational biology and other areas. We consider the Correlation Clustering problem on general graphs, where given an undirected graph (maybe not complete) with each edge being labeled with $\langle + \rangle$ or $\langle - \rangle$, the goal is to partition the vertices into clusters to minimize the number of the disagreements with the edge labeling: the number of $\langle - \rangle$ edges within clusters plus the number of $\langle + \rangle$ edges between clusters. Hereby, a $\langle + \rangle$ (or $\langle - \rangle$) edge means that its end-vertices are similar (or dissimilar) and should belong to the same cluster (or different clusters), and ``missing'' edges are used to denote that we do not know if those end-vertices are similar or dissimilar. Correlation Clustering is NP-hard, even if the input graph is complete, and Unique-Games hard to obtain polynomial-time constant approximation on general graphs. With a complete graph as input, Correlation Clustering admits a $(1.994+\varepsilon )$-approximation. We investigate Correlation Clustering on general graphs from the perspective of parameterized approximability. We set the parameter $k$ as the minimum number of vertices whose removal results in a complete graph, and obtain the first FPT constant-factor approximation for Correlation Clustering on general graphs which runs in $2^{O(k^3)} \cdot \textrm{poly}(n)$ time.

Explore related subjects

cs.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Jianqi Zhou, Zhongyi Zhang, Jiong Guo. 2025-03-01. An FPT Constant-Factor Approximation Algorithm for Correlation Clustering. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.00281

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Beyond Kruskal: Polynomial-Time Tensor Decomposition under the Lovitz-Petrov Condition

Identifiability criteria certify that a given tensor decomposition is a unique rank decomposition. Kruskal's classical condition is one of the best-known deterministic criteria for identifiability. However, no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm is known under the Kruskal condition, and verifying the condition itself is NP-hard. Lovitz and Petrov introduced a strictly more general identifiability condition which, in contrast, is polynomial-time verifiable, but no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm was previously known under this condition. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for tensor decomposition under the Lovitz--Petrov condition. Moreover, combining our algorithm with polynomial-time verification of the Lovitz--Petrov condition yields an efficient end-to-end certification procedure: after computing a decomposition, one can deterministically certify in polynomial time that it is unique and therefore of minimum rank. This contrasts with an arbitrary tensor decomposition, which certifies only an upper bound on the tensor rank, while determining tensor rank is NP-hard in general.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Poisson Exchange Beyond Submodularity: Effective Approximation Algorithms for Offline and Online Subset Selection over Matroids

Over the past decade, a growing body of research has shown that $γ$-weak submodularity broadly arises in numerous subset selection tasks, including feature selection, neural network pruning, and video summarization. Despite its prevalence, maximizing a $γ$-weakly submodular function subject to a general matroid constraint remains challenging. To date, the only known approximation guarantee is the conservative $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ factor established by \citet{chen2018weakly}. To improve upon this result, this paper proposes a novel algorithm called \MGPE, which repeatedly performs maximum-gain local exchanges through careful control of a non-homogeneous Poisson clock, and proves that this \MGPE\ can attain an approximation ratio arbitrarily close to $ρ_γ=1-\left(γ/(2-γ)\right)^{ \frac{γ^2}{2(1-γ)} }$. In sharp contrast to the previous guarantee, our obtained factor $ρ_γ$ not only strictly improves upon $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ for every $γ\in(0,1]$, but also can asymptotically approach the optimal $(1-1/e)$-approximation for submodular maximization as $γ\to1$. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that when the matroid constraint reduces to a cardinality or the objective satisfies the stronger notion of $α$-weak DR-submodularity, \MGPE\ can automatically recover the tight approximation ratios of $1-e^{-γ}$ and $1-e^{-α}$, respectively. Here, $α\in(0,1]$ denotes the DR ratio.

cs.DS↗
arXiv2026

Linear-Query Deterministic Approximation for Non-monotone Submodular Maximization under a Knapsack Constraint

Submodular maximization under a knapsack constraint (SMK) is a fundamental combinatorial optimization problem with broad applications across machine learning and data mining. Motivated by large-scale applications where query efficiency is paramount, we study non-monotone SMK and focus on deterministic algorithms with linear query complexity. Prior deterministic linear-query algorithms achieve at best a $1/5-\varepsilon$ approximation, falling short of the $1/4-\varepsilon$ ratio attainable by randomized algorithms. We close this gap by presenting a deterministic $(1/4-\varepsilon)$-approximation with $O(n\log^2(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ queries. Our approach partitions the analysis based on the cost of the largest optimal element $r$: when the cost of $r$ is moderate, we refine the threshold-twin-greedy framework via residual-budget enumeration to tighten the analysis; when the cost of $r$ is large, we reduce the problem to bicriteria submodular maximization. As a secondary contribution, we obtain a $(1/2-\varepsilon, O(1/\varepsilon))$-bicriteria approximation with $O(n\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ queries, improving over the previous $O(n^2/\varepsilon)$ query bound.

cs.DS↗