Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2503.03841

In-sample calibration yields conformal calibration guarantees

Abstract

Conformal prediction produces a set of predictions that has out-of-sample calibration guarantees by construction, under the assumption of exchangeability. In this work, we study the calibration properties of conformal predictive systems, which issue sets of predictive distributions for real-valued outcomes. We demonstrate that conformal predictive systems implicitly exploit prediction methods that are in-sample calibrated to construct sets that are guaranteed to contain a calibrated predictive distribution out-of-sample. This allows us to take any prediction method that is in-sample calibrated, and conformalize it to obtain a predictive system with out-of-sample calibration guarantees. While the satisfied notion of calibration is typically that prediction intervals derived from the predictive distribution have the correct marginal coverage, we show that this line of reasoning can be extended to stronger conditional notions of calibration that are common in statistical forecasting theory. Using this, we introduce two predictive systems that satisfy stronger out-of-sample calibration guarantees than existing conformal predictive systems. The first method corresponds to a binning of the data, while the second leverages isotonic distributional regression (IDR), a non-parametric distributional regression method under order constraints. We study the theoretical properties of these new predictive systems, and compare their performance in a simulation experiment. They are then applied to two case studies on European temperature forecasts and on predictions for the length of patient stay in Swiss intensive care units. Both approaches are found to outperform existing conformal predictive systems, while conformal IDR additionally provides a natural method for quantifying epistemic uncertainty of the predictions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sam Allen, Georgios Gavrilopoulos, Alexander Henzi, Gian-Reto Kleger, Johanna Ziegel. 2026-08-27. In-sample calibration yields conformal calibration guarantees. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.03841

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bias-Correction for Privacy-Protected Spatial Autoregressive Models with Application to Restaurant Network Analysis

Spatial autoregressive (SAR) models and their extensions are important tools for studying network effects. However, with an increasing emphasis on data privacy, data providers often implement protection measures that render standard SAR models inapplicable. In this study, we introduce a privacy-protected SAR model that incorporates noise into both the response and covariates to meet privacy requirements. With noise present in both components, the traditional quasi-maximum likelihood estimator becomes difficult to compute because the likelihood function cannot be directly formulated. To bypass this hurdle, we begin with a pseudo-likelihood approach, initially omitting the noise in the covariates. A Newton-Raphson algorithm is then applied to compute the estimator; however, the estimator is biased. To address this, we propose a bias-corrected Newton-Raphson-type algorithm that simultaneously accounts for noise in both the response and covariates. We further show, under appropriate regularity conditions, that the resulting estimator is consistent and asymptotically normal. To further enhance computational efficiency, we also develop a bias-corrected least squares estimator. Several extensions are discussed, and the finite-sample performance of the proposed methods is evaluated through extensive simulations. We apply the proposed methodology to restaurant transaction data from a third-party payment platform. Our method identifies a statistically significant competitive network effect among restaurants and further reveals meaningful restaurant-customer interaction patterns.

stat.ME

A variational framework for modal estimation

Multivariate mode estimation arises in many statistical problems such as inverse problems, multimodal sampling, and density-based clustering, but becomes challenging in moderate to high dimensions, especially when the underlying density is not directly evaluable. We introduce GERVE (Gibbs-measure Entropy-Regularized Variational Estimation), a sample-based method for estimating multivariate modes by approximating Gibbs distributions directly from samples, without estimating or evaluating the density. GERVE uses Gaussian-mixture variational annealing and natural-gradient optimization, producing a mixture concentrated in high-density regions whose component responsibilities also provide a clustering of the observations. We prove theoretical guarantees in two regimes: as the Gibbs temperature goes to zero, the optimal variational mixture concentrates around the global modes of the population density; at fixed positive temperature, we prove existence, consistency, and asymptotic normality of empirical maximizers and propose a bootstrap procedure for uncertainty quantification. Simulations and a real-data experiment show that GERVE accurately recovers modes and produces meaningful clusters.

stat.ME

Objective Model Prior Probabilities in Variable Selection

For many years it was routine to use equal model prior probabilities in Bayesian model uncertainty analysis. At least twenty years ago it became clear that this was problematic, leading to support of much too large models in the increasingly huge model spaces being considered in genomics and other fields. A popular replacement was to adopt a suggestion of Harold Jeffreys for the variable selection problem in which a total of $k$ possible variables are being considered for inclusion in the model: give the collection of all models containing $d$ variables ($d = 0, . . . , k$) prior probability $1/(k + 1)$ and then divide this prior probability equally among the models in the collection. Many other choices of model prior probabilities that impose severe parsimony have also been introduced. We begin by reviewing the problems with using equal model prior probabilities and then discuss some serious problems with the Jeffreys choice. Finally, we introduce and study a number of objective alternative choices of model prior probabilities, from both numerical and theoretical perspectives.

stat.ME