Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2503.05826

The Fertile Steppe: Computability Logic and the decidability of one of its fragments

Abstract

The present work is devoted to Computability Logic (CoL), the young and volcanic research-project developed by Giorgi Japaridze. Our main goal is to provide the reader with a clear panoramic view of this vast new land, starting from its core knots and making our way towards the outer threads, in a somewhat three-dimensional, spacial gait. Furthermore, through the present work, we provide a tentative proof for the decidability of one of CoL's numerous axiomatisations, namely CL15. Thus, our expedition initially takes off for an aerial, perusal overview of this fertile steppe. The first chapter introduces CoL in a philosophical fashion, exposing and arguing its main key points. We then move over to unfold its semantics and syntax profiles, allowing the reader to become increasingly more familiar with this new environment. Landing on to the second chapter, we thoroughly introduce Cirquent Calculus, the new deductive system Japaridze has developed in order to axiomatise Computability Logic. Indeed, this new proof-system can also be a useful tool for many other logics. We then review each of the 17 axiomatisations found so far. The third chapter zooms-in on CL15, in order to come up with a possible solution to its open problem. We outline its soundness and completeness proofs; then provide some few deductive examples; and, finally, build a tentative proof of its decidability. Lastly, the fourth chapter focuses on the potential and actual applications of Computability Logic, both in arithmetic (clarithmetic) and in Artificial Intelligence systems (meaning knowledgebase and planning-and-action ones). We close our journey with some final remarks on the richness of this framework and, hence, the research-worthiness it entails.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stella Spadoni. 2025-03-05. The Fertile Steppe: Computability Logic and the decidability of one of its fragments. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.05826

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deciding Predicate Logical Theories of Real-Valued Functions

The notion of a real-valued function is central to mathematics, computer science, and many other scientific fields. Despite this importance, there are hardly any positive results on decision procedures for predicate logical theories that reason about real-valued functions. This paper defines a first-order predicate language for reasoning about multi-dimensional smooth real-valued functions and their derivatives, and demonstrates that - despite the obvious undecidability barriers - certain positive decidability results for such a language are indeed possible.

cs.LO

Structural Liveness of Conservative Petri Nets

We show that the EXPSPACE-hardness result for structural liveness of Petri nets [Jancar and Purser, 2019] holds even for a simple subclass of conservative nets. As our main result, we prove that for structurally live conservative nets, the values of the minimal live markings are at most doubly exponential in the size of the net. This implies the EXPSPACE-completeness of structural liveness for conservative Petri nets. The result also applies to structurally bounded Petri nets, whereas the complexity of the general case remains open. As a proof ingredient of independent interest, we present an extension of known results on the bounds of minimal integer solutions to Boolean combinations of linear equalities, inequalities, and divisibility constraints.

cs.LO

Verifying Numerical Methods with Isabelle/HOL

Modern machine learning pipelines and ODE solvers are built on numerical algorithms. Reliable numerical methods are thus a prerequisite for trustworthy machine learning and cyber-physical systems. We evaluate a framework designed for verifying imperative programs and the Isabelle proof assistant as tools for proving the total correctness of four numerical algorithms: the bisection method, the fixed-point method, the perceptron, and the gradient descent algorithm. Our verifications required subtle extensions and generalisations to Isabelle's version of Taylor's theorem and higher-order derivatives. Finally, we reflect on the framework's automation, friendly syntax, and on further requirements to turn it into a verification tool for numerical methods.

cs.LO