Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2503.07058

Breaking the Limits of Quantization-Aware Defenses: QADT-R for Robustness Against Patch-Based Adversarial Attacks in QNNs

Abstract

Quantized Neural Networks (QNNs) have emerged as a promising solution for reducing model size and computational costs, making them well-suited for deployment in edge and resource-constrained environments. While quantization is known to disrupt gradient propagation and enhance robustness against pixel-level adversarial attacks, its effectiveness against patch-based adversarial attacks remains largely unexplored. In this work, we demonstrate that adversarial patches remain highly transferable across quantized models, achieving over 70\% attack success rates (ASR) even at extreme bit-width reductions (e.g., 2-bit). This challenges the common assumption that quantization inherently mitigates adversarial threats. To address this, we propose Quantization-Aware Defense Training with Randomization (QADT-R), a novel defense strategy that integrates Adaptive Quantization-Aware Patch Generation (A-QAPA), Dynamic Bit-Width Training (DBWT), and Gradient-Inconsistent Regularization (GIR) to enhance resilience against highly transferable patch-based attacks. A-QAPA generates adversarial patches within quantized models, ensuring robustness across different bit-widths. DBWT introduces bit-width cycling during training to prevent overfitting to a specific quantization setting, while GIR injects controlled gradient perturbations to disrupt adversarial optimization. Extensive evaluations on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet show that QADT-R reduces ASR by up to 25\% compared to prior defenses such as PBAT and DWQ. Our findings further reveal that PBAT-trained models, while effective against seen patch configurations, fail to generalize to unseen patches due to quantization shift. Additionally, our empirical analysis of gradient alignment, spatial sensitivity, and patch visibility provides insights into the mechanisms that contribute to the high transferability of patch-based attacks in QNNs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Amira Guesmi, Bassem Ouni, Muhammad Shafique. 2025-03-10. Breaking the Limits of Quantization-Aware Defenses: QADT-R for Robustness Against Patch-Based Adversarial Attacks in QNNs. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.07058

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Privacy Leakage on DNNs: A Survey of Model Inversion Attacks and Defenses

Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have revolutionized various domains with their exceptional performance across numerous applications. However, Model Inversion (MI) attacks, which disclose private information about the training dataset by abusing access to the trained models, have emerged as a formidable privacy threat. Given a trained network, these attacks enable adversaries to reconstruct high-fidelity data that closely aligns with the private training samples, posing significant privacy concerns. Despite the rapid advances in the field, we lack a comprehensive and systematic overview of existing MI attacks and defenses. To fill this gap, this paper thoroughly investigates this realm and presents a holistic survey. Firstly, our work briefly reviews early MI studies on traditional machine learning scenarios. We then elaborately analyze and compare numerous recent attacks and defenses on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) across multiple modalities and learning tasks. By meticulously analyzing their distinctive features, we summarize and classify these methods into different categories and provide a novel taxonomy. Finally, this paper discusses promising research directions and presents potential solutions to open issues. To facilitate further study on MI attacks and defenses, we have implemented an open-source model inversion toolbox on GitHub (https://github.com/ffhibnese/Model-Inversion-Attack-ToolBox).

cs.CV

ALINA: Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm

Labels are the cornerstone of supervised machine learning algorithms. Most visual recognition methods are fully supervised, using bounding boxes or pixel-wise segmentations for object localization. Traditional labeling methods, such as crowd-sourcing, are prohibitive due to cost, data privacy, amount of time, and potential errors on large datasets. To address these issues, we propose a novel annotation framework, Advanced Line Identification and Notation Algorithm (ALINA), which can be used for labeling taxiway datasets that consist of different camera perspectives and variable weather attributes (sunny and cloudy). Additionally, the CIRCular threshoLd pixEl Discovery And Traversal (CIRCLEDAT) algorithm has been proposed, which is an integral step in determining the pixels corresponding to taxiway line markings. Once the pixels are identified, ALINA generates corresponding pixel coordinate annotations on the frame. Using this approach, 60,249 frames from the taxiway dataset, AssistTaxi have been labeled. To evaluate the performance, a context-based edge map (CBEM) set was generated manually based on edge features and connectivity. The detection rate after testing the annotated labels with the CBEM set was recorded as 98.45%, attesting its dependability and effectiveness.

cs.CV

DisasterInsight: A Building-Centric Benchmark for Evaluating Vision--Language Models in Disaster Response

Vision--language models (VLMs) show promise for disaster-response remote sensing, but existing benchmarks mainly emphasize scene-level or damage-centric assessment. To study this building-centric gap, we introduce \method{}, a diagnostic benchmark built on xBD, a pre/post-disaster satellite dataset with building-level damage labels. \method{} enriches building instances with OpenStreetMap-derived functional labels and contains 134{,}108 task-specific instruction records across 15 task types, spanning instance-level assessment, scene-level counting, multi-instance reasoning, and structured report generation. The benchmark supports RGB pre/post-disaster imagery, single- and multi-view instance formulations, and scene-level RGB/SAR diagnostic inputs. Experiments with general-domain and remote-sensing VLMs show that models perform better on visible damage cues than on building-function understanding, multi-instance reasoning, counting, and grounded reporting. Instruction tuning improves performance on several tasks but does not close this building-centric gap.

cs.CV