Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2503.07343

Robust a posteriori estimation of probit-lognormal seismic fragility curves via sequential design of experiments and constrained reference prior

Abstract

A seismic fragility curve expresses the probability of failure of a structure conditional to an intensity measure (IM) derived from seismic signals. When only limited data is available, the practitioner often refers to the probit-lognormal model coupled with maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) to obtain estimates of these curves. This means that only a binary indicator of the state (BIS) of the structure is known, namely a failure or non-failure state indicator, when it is subjected to a seismic signal with an intensity measure IM. In this context, the objective of this work is to propose a method for optimally estimating such curves by obtaining the most precise estimate possible with the minimum of data. The novelty of our work is twofold. First, we present and show how to mitigate the likelihood degeneracy problem which is ubiquitous with small data sets and hampers frequentist approaches such as MLE. Second, we propose a novel strategy for sequential design of experiments (DoE) that selects seismic signals from a large database of synthetic or real signals via their IM values, to be applied to structures to evaluate the corresponding BISs. This strategy relies on a criterion based on information theory in a Bayesian framework. It therefore aims to sequentially designate the IM value such that the pair (IM, BIS) has on average, with respect to the BIS of the structure, the greatest impact on the posterior distribution of the fragility curve. The methodology is applied to a case study from the nuclear industry. The results demonstrate its ability to efficiently and robustly estimate the fragility curve, and to avoid degeneracy even with a limited amount of data, i.e., less than 100. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the estimates quickly reach the model bias induced by the probit-lognormal modeling. Eventually, two criteria are suggested to help the user stop the DoE algorithm.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Antoine Van Biesbroeck, Clément Gauchy, Cyril Feau, Josselin Garnier. 2025-12-16. Robust a posteriori estimation of probit-lognormal seismic fragility curves via sequential design of experiments and constrained reference prior. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114695

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Relegation, promotion and the components of scoring in water polo

Relegation, not the championship, decides the outcome of many European water polo leagues: one club has won every recent national title in Italy, Spain and Hungary. We make the relegation decision our object of inference. Serie A1 relegates one club for finishing last and a second through a three-match play-out, and we ask at each stage how much can be known and when. Promoted clubs arrive with no top-flight record, so we also compare four ways of setting their prior. These analyses rest on the first Bayesian hierarchical model of water polo, which splits scoring into even-strength, man-up and penalty components, models opportunities and conversions separately, and lets abilities evolve between seasons. Treating the components as independent proves untenable, since they compete for a common budget of possessions. Fitted to a new dataset of 940 matches, the model identifies the directly relegated club from the ninth round, before the league table does, predicts the play-out field better than the table, and shows the play-out itself to be close to a coin toss. Promoted clubs start below the league on every component except drawing exclusions: knowing a club was promoted improves forecasts; knowing how does not.

stat.AP

Geospatial Foundation Models Capture Health-Relevant Dimensions of Place Beyond Conventional Social Risk Indices

Area-based social risk indices summarize residents' socioeconomic conditions but incompletely capture physical features of place that may affect health. We evaluated whether numerical representations of physical place produced by four geospatial foundation model families from 2022 satellite data explained residual variance in tract-level associations between the Area Deprivation Index, Social Deprivation Index, and Social Vulnerability Index with health outcomes. We used LightGBM to predict variables from the American Community Survey and 40 chronic disease and health-behavior outcomes from CDC PLACES across 82,646 census tracts in the contiguous United States, evaluating performance across 10 held-out states. Among survey variables, models were moderately predictive of some variables including housing type (R-squared up to 0.54) but weak for disability, unemployment, and income disparity. For health outcomes, models explained up to 54% of variance left unexplained by social risk indices, with the largest gains for annual checkups, arthritis, and high blood pressure. Mean total variance explained by geospatial foundation models across the 40 health-related outcomes increased from 0.31 in the smallest tract-size decile to 0.39 in the largest. Geospatial foundation models capture health-relevant features of place not represented by conventional social risk indices and may usefully augment them in epidemiological analyses.

stat.AP

Transporting summary measures of relative effects from randomised trials to the treated patient population: an application to breast cancer endocrine therapy

Randomised trials often report relative treatment effects, such as risk ratios and hazard ratios, for trial populations. Clinical decision-making, however, often benefits from estimates of absolute treatment effects in the population eligible for treatment. Trial participants may not represent this target population well, and restrictions on access to individual participant trial data can further complicate absolute effect estimation. Routine care data are often representative of the target population but may be subject to uncontrolled confounding. We consider estimation of the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT), an absolute measure, by combining a representative sample of treated routine care patients with summary measures (i.e., estimated risk or hazard ratios) from either a randomised trial or a meta-analysis of trials. Under marginal or conditional transportability assumptions, the ATT is shown to be identifiable. The implications of collapsibility of the effect measure on transportability are discussed, and plug-in estimators of the ATT are presented. Simulation studies are used to assess finite sample performance of the estimators in a range of settings. The proposed methods are applied to estimate the ATT of endocrine therapy on 15-year breast cancer mortality using results from a meta-analysis of randomised trials and England's National Disease Registration Service.

stat.AP