Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2503.11464

Scalable Global Solution Techniques for High-Dimensional Models in Dynare

Abstract

For over three decades, Dynare has been a cornerstone of dynamic stochastic modeling in economics, relying primarily on perturbation-based local solution methods. However, these techniques often falter in high-dimensional, non-linear models that demand more comprehensive approaches. This paper demonstrates that global solutions of economic models with substantial heterogeneity and frictions can be computed accurately and swiftly by augmenting Dynare with adaptive sparse grids (SGs) and high-dimensional model representation (HDMR). SGs mitigate the curse of dimensionality, as the number of grid points grows significantly slower than in traditional tensor-product Cartesian grids. Additionally, adaptivity focuses grid refinement on regions with steep gradients or non-differentiabilities, enhancing computational efficiency. Complementing SGs, HDMR tackles large state spaces by approximating policy functions with a hierarchical expansion of low-dimensional terms. Using a time iteration algorithm, we benchmark our approach on an international real business cycle model. Our results show that both SGs and HDMR alleviate the curse of dimensionality, enabling accurate solutions for at least 100-dimensional models on standard hardware in relatively short times. This advancement extends Dynare's capabilities beyond perturbation approaches, establishing a versatile platform for sophisticated non-linear models and paving the way for integrating the most recent global solution methods, such as those from machine learning.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aryan Eftekhari, Michel Juillard, Normann Rion, Simon Scheidegger. 2025-03-14. Scalable Global Solution Techniques for High-Dimensional Models in Dynare. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.11464

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN