Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2503.16229

Counting cliques with prescribed intersection sizes

Abstract

We study the generalized Turán problem regarding cliques with restricted intersections, which highlights the motivation from extremal set theory. Let $L=\{\ell_1,\dots,\ell_s\}\subset [0,r-1]$ be a fixed integer set with $|L|\notin \{1,r\}$ and $\ell_1<\dots<\ell_s$, and let $Ψ_r(n,L)$ denote the maximum number of $r$-cliques in an $n$-vertex graph whose $r$-cliques are $L$-intersecting as a family of $r$-subsets. Helliar and Liu recently initiated the systematic study of the function $Ψ_r(n,L)$ and showed that $Ψ_r(n,L)\le \left(1-\frac{1}{3r}\right) \prod_{\ell\in L}\frac{n-\ell}{r-\ell}$ for large $n$, improving the trivial bound from the Deza--Erdős--Frankl theorem by a factor of $1-\frac{1}{3r}$. In this article, we improve their result by showing that as $n$ goes to infinity $Ψ_r(n,L)=Θ_{r,L}(n^{|L|})$ if and only if $\ell_1,\dots,\ell_s,r$ form an arithmetic progression and fully determining the corresponding exact values of $Ψ_r(n,L)$ for sufficiently large $n$ in this case. Moreover, when $L=[t,r-1]$, for the generalized Turán extension of the Erdős--Ko--Rado theorem given by Helliar and Liu, we show a Hilton--Milner-type stability result.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yuhao Zhao, Xiande Zhang. 2025-03-20. Counting cliques with prescribed intersection sizes. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16229

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO