Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2503.17040

Semiotic problem framing: a new framework to guide students and teachers in conceptual understanding and teaching of physics

Matteo Tuveri·Arianna Steri·Viviana Fanti
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Problem solving in physics requires more than applying formulas: it involves describing and modeling phenomena, connecting mathematics with physics, and justifying reasoning choices. This process, known as problem framing, has been extensively studied in its cognitive and epistemic dimensions, but its semiotic aspects - how visuals, symbols, language, and metaphors shape understanding - remain underexplored. Physics relies on multiple representational modes that must be coordinated to construct meaning, and semiotics plays a central role in this integration. In this theoretical paper, we propose a new framework - the Semiotic Problem Framing - that explicitly incorporates semiotics into existing problem framing in physics. SPF highlights how students mobilize and shift across linguistic, visual, symbolic, and metaphorical resources in problem solving. For students, it offers a guide to structure reasoning and develop representational fluency; for teachers, it provides a diagnostic tool to scaffold and monitor learning processes. SPF enables analysis of reasoning patterns and error types not captured in previous frameworks, and suggests new directions for instructional design in physics education.

Explore related subjects

physics.ed-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Matteo Tuveri, Arianna Steri, Viviana Fanti. 2026-07-13. Semiotic problem framing: a new framework to guide students and teachers in conceptual understanding and teaching of physics. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404%2Fae2445

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Addressing misconceptions in university physics: A review and experiences from quantum physics educators

Students often begin physics courses with misconceptions rooted in everyday experience and intuition, which can be resistant to change. While research has identified strategies for addressing misconceptions across physics, it remains unclear whether different domains, like classical and quantum physics, require different approaches. Quantum concepts can pose different representational and mathematical demands, while both domains require instructors to elicit and develop students' reasoning. To support discussion of these instructional challenges, we organize selected literature on addressing misconceptions in physics education and summarize instructors' accounts. The overview groups 122 distinct works into four categories, with further subcategories. A preliminary framework developed from existing review literature informed the interview guide. We interviewed 12 instructors from the University of Waterloo's Institute for Quantum Computing and the Perimeter Institute, who have collectively taught over 100 quantum courses. The accounts describe difficulties involving instructional representations, prerequisite knowledge, and the interpretation of students' reasoning, alongside reported diagnostic and instructional responses. We draw these accounts and the literature together as questions for instructional planning. The report does not resolve the intended classical--quantum comparison or establish comparative instructional effectiveness.

physics.ed-ph↗
arXiv2026

Johann Bernoulli's analysis of elastic collisions (a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law thereby inspired)

In order to explain an elastic collision, Johann Bernoulli considered two bodies connected by a spring. Motion is defined as a succession of states of rest. Then, considering the spring to be a lever with a body at each extremity, the laws of equilibrium imply that `motion' is described by the time variation of the (common) quantity of motion of the bodies; the dynamic law is thus deduced. This inspires a teaching sequence to introduce the dynamic law (in one dimension) in introductory physics course; we call it ``bernoullian sequence''.

physics.ed-ph↗
arXiv2026

Design and Initial Evaluation of a Photovoltaics-focused Course-based Undergraduate Research Experience in Physics

Traditional physics laboratory courses often focus on experiments with well-known results, limiting students' engagement in authentic scientific practices. Course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), where students engage in real research with unknown outcomes, have been shown to support positive student outcomes, such as increased self-efficacy, persistence, and engagement in scientific practices. However, discipline-specific studies of CUREs in physics remain limited. We describe the development, structure, and initial implementation of a photovoltaics-focused CURE in a second-year undergraduate physics laboratory course at the University of Colorado Boulder. To examine how students experienced the course, we analyzed end-of-semester reflection assignments using the five CURE components (i.e., scientific practices, discovery, relevance, collaboration, and iteration), as well as established dimensions of research authenticity, as analytic frameworks. Students described experiences associated with all five CURE components, with collaboration, relevance, and scientific practices appearing most prominently in their reflections. Students also associated authentic research with meaningful scientific contribution, engagement in authentic scientific practices, and navigating the uncertainty and setbacks inherent in research, although fewer explicitly identified themselves as researchers or scientists. A subset of students additionally connected the course to their immediate thinking about future academic and professional pathways. This work contributes both a discipline-specific model for implementing CUREs in experimental physics laboratory courses and provides insight into how students interpret and experience authentic research within this course context.

physics.ed-ph↗