Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2503.22633

The moment polytope of matrix multiplication is not maximal

Maxim van den Berg·Matthias Christandl·Vladimir Lysikov·Harold Nieuwboer·Michael Walter·Jeroen Zuiddam
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Moment polytopes of tensors, the study of which is deeply rooted in invariant theory, representation theory and symplectic geometry, have found relevance in numerous places, from quantum information (entanglement polytopes) and algebraic complexity theory (GCT program and the complexity of matrix multiplication) to optimization (scaling algorithms). Towards an open problem in algebraic complexity theory, we prove separations between the moment polytopes of matrix multiplication tensors and unit tensors. As a consequence, we find that matrix multiplication moment polytopes are not maximal, i.e. are strictly contained in the corresponding Kronecker polytope. As another consequence, we obtain a no-go result for a natural operational characterization of moment polytope inclusion in terms of asymptotic restriction. We generalize the separation and non-maximality to moment polytopes of iterated matrix multiplication tensors. Our result implies that tensor networks where multipartite entanglement structures beyond two-party entanglement are allowed can go beyond projected entangled-pair states (PEPS) in terms of expressivity. Our proof characterizes membership of uniform points in moment polytopes of tensors, and establishes a connection to polynomial multiplication tensors via the minrank of matrix subspaces. As a result of independent interest, we extend these techniques to obtain a new proof of the optimal border subrank bound for matrix multiplication.

Explore related subjects

cs.CCmath.AGmath.RTmath.SGquant-ph

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Maxim van den Berg, Matthias Christandl, Vladimir Lysikov, Harold Nieuwboer, Michael Walter, Jeroen Zuiddam. 2025-03-28. The moment polytope of matrix multiplication is not maximal. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22633

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

CVP Is NP-Complete for Principal Cyclotomic Ideals

We prove that exact Euclidean decision-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete on the coefficient lattices of nonzero principal ideals in the power-of-two cyclotomic rings $R_d:=\mathbb{Z}[y]/(y^d+1)$. Our deterministic reduction from Exact Cover by 3-Sets (X3C) produces a target and a squared threshold $Δ$ such that the closest squared distance is exactly $Δ$ in YES instances and at least $Δ+4$ in NO instances. This also implies $\mathsf{NP}$-hardness of exact search-CVP under polynomial-time Turing reductions. We also transfer the resulting principal-ideal CVP instances to full-rank principal ideals of the cyclic quotient ring $\mathbb{Z}[X]/(X^D-1)$, where $D:=2d$. Their coefficient lattices are invariant under cyclic coordinate shifts. The lift preserves principality and multiplies corresponding squared distances by eight. Thus, on principal cyclic ideal lattices, exact decision-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete and exact search-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard. We also obtain uniformly computable fixed cyclotomic and cyclic families in which only the target and threshold depend on the X3C collection. Consequently, a polynomial-time solution to exact decision-CVPP on either family would imply $\mathsf{NP}\subseteq\mathsf{P}/\mathrm{poly}$ and collapse the polynomial hierarchy to $Σ_2^{\mathsf{P}}$. To our knowledge, the cyclic results answer Micciancio's questions of whether exact decision-CVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard on cyclic lattices and on a fixed family of cyclic lattices, even when restricted to full-rank principal cyclic ideals. Finally, under the coefficient embedding, we prove that exact decision-module-SIVP is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete on free rank-two modules over the same cyclotomic rings.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Fooling Thresholds of Halfspaces

We initiate the study of constructing explicit pseudorandom generators for thresholds of halfspaces with seed length polylogarithmic in the number of halfspaces. This class of functions lies at the frontier of circuit complexity [CTW26]. We show that the generator designed by O'Donnell, Servedio, and Tan for polytopes [OST22] also fools this broader class. To analyze the generator, we develop a threshold-specific smooth approximation framework based on a Bentkus-type mollifier. We prove derivative bounds for this mollifier and also establish a Boolean anticoncentration theorem for thresholds of halfspaces via a random thinning argument. These ingredients imply that the generator $δ$-fools every $k$-out-of-$m$ threshold of $m$ halfspaces over $\{-1,1\}^n$ with seed length $\widetilde{O}(κ^{6+2\varepsilon}\log^{6+2\varepsilon}\!m\cdotδ^{-(2+2\varepsilon)}\log n)$, for any arbitrarily small constant $\varepsilon>0$, where $κ=\min\{k,m-k+1\}$. The random thinning argument also yields bounds on the noise sensitivity and Gaussian surface area for thresholds of halfspaces, leading to learning algorithms under both the uniform and Gaussian distributions.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

FPT=PTIME for Homomorphism Problems on Sparse-Incidence and Bounded-Independence Patterns

Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), fixed-parameter tractability and polynomial-time solvability coincide for homomorphism problems specified by classes of pattern hypergraphs of bounded incidence degeneracy or bounded primal independence number. In both cases, tractability is characterised by bounded fractional hypertree width. Grohe (JACM 2007) established the corresponding FPT-PTIME equivalence under bounded arity. Our result allows unbounded arity and covers important cases such as bounded-degree patterns and patterns whose incidence graphs exclude a fixed minor. Building on the recent fractional balanced-separator framework and rounding theorem of Korchemna et al. (FOCS 2024), we prove a near-linear bound on fractional hypertree width ($\mathsf{fhw}$) in terms of adaptive width ($\mathsf{adw}$). For every hypergraph $H$ with $\mathsf{adw}(H)\geq 2$, \[ \mathsf{fhw}(H)=O\bigl(λ(H)\mathsf{adw}(H)\log\mathsf{adw}(H)\bigr), \] where $λ(H)=\min\{μ(H),\max\{1,\logα(H)\}\}$, with $μ(H)$ denoting incidence degeneracy and $α(H)$ the independence number of the primal graph. As a further consequence, we obtain a corresponding FPT-PTIME collapse for exact homomorphism counting on every bounded-$λ$ class. More generally, for every recursively enumerable class of pattern hypergraphs, fixed-parameter tractability of the parameterised homomorphism problem implies quasipolynomial-time solvability of the corresponding unparameterised problem, assuming ETH.

cs.CC↗