Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2503.22938

Community-driven and water quality indicators of sanitation system failures in a rural U.S. community

Abstract

Safe sanitation access is commonly believed to be ubiquitous in high-income countries; however, researchers and community advocates have exposed a glaring lack of access for many low-income communities and communities of color across the U.S. While this disparity has been identified and quantified at a high level, local and household-level implications of sanitation failures remain ill-defined. We develop a set of user-based and environmental measures to assess the performance of centralized wastewater systems, septic systems, and straight-piped systems in Lowndes County, Alabama. We combine qualitative, survey, and environmental sampled data to holistically compare user experiences across infrastructure types. This integrated approach reveals new routes of exposure to wastewater through informal household maintenance and system backups and provides evidence for the spread of wastewater-like contamination throughout the community. This work elucidates the severity of sanitation failures in one rural U.S. community and provides a framework to assess sanitation quality in other contexts with limited sanitation access in high-income countries.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lorelay Mendoza Grijalva, Allisa G. Hastie, Meili Gong, Brenda Rojas Cala, Brandon Hunter, Stephanie Wallace, Rojelio Mejia, Catherine Flowers, Khalid K. Osman, William A. Tarpeh. 2025-03-29. Community-driven and water quality indicators of sanitation system failures in a rural U.S. community. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.22938

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN