Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2503.23559

Are Bushmeat Hunters Profit Maximizers or Simply Brigands of Opportunity?

Abstract

Bushmeat hunters on Bioko Island, Equatorial Guinea use shotguns and snares to capture wild arboreal and ground animals for sale in the Malabo Bushmeat market. Two tools for the analysis of economic efficiency, the production possibilities frontier and isorevenue line, can be used to explain the post hoc changing spatial distribution of takeoff rates of bushmeat. This study analyzes changes in technical efficiencies over time and in different locations for the open access wildlife hunted on Bioko for the last ten years. Due to inadequate refrigeration in the field and the bushmeat market, animals must be sold quickly. The result is a takeoff distribution that is not efficient, consequently too many of the wrong species of animals are harvested. The larger, slower-breeding mammals, such as monkeys disappear before the smaller, faster-breeding mammals, such as blue duikers and pouched rats, promoting a steepening of the production possibilities frontier, inducing a greater takeoff of monkeys than the expected efficient level. Soon after hunters penetrate into a new area, the relative selling price of monkeys exceeds the rate of transformation between ground animals and arboreal animals triggering inefficient and unsustainable harvests

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Wayne A. Morra, Gail W. Hearn, Andrew J. Buck. 2025-03-30. Are Bushmeat Hunters Profit Maximizers or Simply Brigands of Opportunity?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.23559

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access to Live AI Advice and Behavior Under Risk: An Incentivized Experiment

Generative AI has become an everyday advisor, and the systems people consult are live and interactive, not pre-scripted. We ask whether access to such a system changes behavior under risk. In an incentivized experiment (N = 158), participants made lottery choices with an optional decision aid presented as a conventional pre-written tool, a live one-shot AI, or a live interactive AI they could query, with information format held equivalent across conditions. Risk preferences are elicited via DOSE. We find no evidence that access to a live AI advisor changes risk aversion.

econ.GN

Bricks or Cash? Externalities of Housing Upgrading in High-density Cities

We estimate housing externalities in a high-density city, exploiting the staggered rollout of Singapore's nationwide Main Upgrading Programme for public housing. Controlling for nonrandom neighborhood exposure, we find that upgrading raises treated buildings' prices by 11.5% upon completion and neighboring buildings' resale prices by about 2% within 500 meters, decaying to zero beyond. A model with distance-decaying externalities shows that in dense settings spillovers justify the distortions of in-kind provision; this advantage diminishes and reverses at lower densities. Administrative data on over 2 million residents show that upgrading disproportionately retains older incumbents, suggesting age-specific amenities as an underexplored externality channel.

econ.GN

The Joneses Visit an Economics Lab

Existing literature offers persuasive evidence that individuals care about how their consumption compares to that of peers, and proposes a large variety of explanatory models. The present paper proposes a common framework for many of those models, and compares their ability to predict behavior in a laboratory experiment. We find evidence of Keeping up with the Joneses motivations but also find that conspicuous consumption is enhanced by Veblen motivations arising from peers' ability to observe one's own choice. Among the seven quasi-linear preference models we compare, our data are best explained by a model that contrasts envy and pride (upward vs downward comparisons) using a value function borrowed from Prospect Theory.

econ.GN