Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2504.01862

Axiomatic Foundations of Fractal Analysis and Fractal Number Theory

Stanislav Semenov
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We develop an axiomatic framework for fractal analysis and fractal number theory grounded in hierarchies of definability. Central to this approach is a sequence of formal systems F_n, each corresponding to a definability level S_n contained in R of constructively accessible mathematical objects. This structure refines classical analysis by replacing uncountable global constructs with countable, syntactically constrained approximations. The axioms formalize: - A hierarchy of definability levels S_n, indexed by syntactic and ordinal complexity; - Fractal topologies and the induced notions of continuity, compactness, and differentiability; - Layered integration and differentiation with explicit convergence and definability bounds; - Arithmetic and function spaces over the stratified continuum R_{S_n}, which is a subset of R. This framework synthesizes constructive mathematics, proof-theoretic stratification, and fractal geometric intuition into a unified, finitistically structured model. Key results include the definability-based classification of real numbers (e.g., algebraic, computable, Liouville), a stratified fundamental theorem of calculus with syntactic error bounds, and compatibility with base systems such as RCA_0 and ACA_0. The framework enables constructive approximation and syntactic regularization of classical analysis, with applications to proof assistants, computable mathematics, and foundational studies of the continuum.

Explore related subjects

math.GM

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Stanislav Semenov. 2025-04-02. Axiomatic Foundations of Fractal Analysis and Fractal Number Theory. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.01862

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

A Proof of Liu's Conjecture on the Fundamental Triangle Inequality

Let $a,b,c$ be the side lengths of a triangle, and let $R$ and $r$ denote its circumradius and inradius, respectively. Liu proposed the conjecture \[ \sum_{\text{cyc}} \left(\frac{a(b+c-a)}{bc}\right)^k \ge 2+\left(\frac{2r}{R}\right)^k,\qquad k>1, \] with the reverse inequality for $k<1$. We prove this conjecture by reducing it to an algebraic inequality for three positive variables with prescribed sum and product. We also determine the equality cases.

math.GM↗
arXiv2026

A quadratic critical-value conjecture for the fifth Bessel moment

We conjecture an explicit evaluation of the pure fifth Bessel moment $\int_0^\infty K_0(t)^5\,dt$ as a quadratic expression in the critical value $L(f,2)$ of the weight-three, level-60 newform $f$ (LMFDB orbit 60.3.b.a) identified in the twisted fifth-moment modularity theorem of Lim, Tu and Yu, with coefficients in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5})$ and the square taken before the real and imaginary parts. Directed interval computations, using no stored Bessel or $L$-values, bound the absolute discrepancy by $10^{-358}$. We prove three exact modular identities for $f$: the Petersson-norm formula $\langle f,f\rangle_{60} = \frac{3(5-\sqrt{5})}{2π^4}|L(f,2)|^2$, the coefficient-conjugation relation $L(f^σ,2) = κL(f,2)$ with explicit $κ\in \mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{5},i)$, and the twisted symmetric-square evaluation $L(χ_{-4}\mathrm{Sym}^2 f,2) = \sqrt{15}\,π^2 \langle f,f\rangle_{60}$, together with $L(χ_{-4}\mathrm{Sym}^2 f,3) = π^4\langle f,f\rangle_{60}/8$, in the full Euler-factor normalization of Lim, Tu and Yu. The last identity shows that the companion norm conjecture $D_{5,\mathrm{odd}} = \frac{3\sqrt{15}(5-\sqrt{5})}{2}|L(f,2)|^2$ is equivalent to the symmetric-square conjecture $D_{5,\mathrm{odd}} = π^2 L(χ_{-4}\mathrm{Sym}^2 f,2)$ of Lim, Tu and Yu, while the exact relation $D_{5,\mathrm{even}} = π^2 D_{5,\mathrm{odd}}/(2\sqrt{15})$ follows from Chuang's period formulas. Every Bessel-to-modular equality, including the individual-period formula, remains conjectural. Complete proofs, exact rational certificates and verification programs are included as ancillary files.

math.GM↗