Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2504.02835

Leapfrogging of a deterministic model for microeconomic systems in competitive markets

Abstract

The Behrens-Feichtinger model provides a deterministic picture for the co-evolution of sales of two firms, producing the same goods and competing in a common market. The model involves an active investment strategy such that the temporary investment of each of the two firms depends on its relative position in the market. In this work we are interested in a specific regime of evolution referred to as leapfrogging regime, in which each firm has the possibility to dominate the market alternately during some finite period of time. We examine conditions favoring the leapfrogging dynamics of the model by introducing two appropriate variables, namely the sale difference and total sale of the two firms at any time. An analysis of stability of fixed points of the resulting coupled discrete nonlinear equations is carried out, and the bifurcation diagrams of the sale difference and sum with respect to the elasticity coefficient, are generated. A time-series analysis suggests that the leapfrogging regime, characterized by periodic oscillations of the sale difference from positive to negative branches, is stabilized by specific values of characteristic parameters of the model and when in addition the elasticity coefficient, related to the difference in investment strategies of the two firms, is reasonably high. A positive sign of cumulated sales at any time is required to ensure the availability of goods during the leapfrogging dynamics.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Alain M. Dikande, H. Ntahombagana Matabaro. 2025-03-17. Leapfrogging of a deterministic model for microeconomic systems in competitive markets. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.02835

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Exchange Rate Determination for Cryptocurrency Mergers: A Formal Framework

Many of the thousands of existing cryptocurrencies suffer from declining adoption, low liquidity and weak security, and merging two of them into a single ecosystem is a natural alternative to abandonment. No rigorous framework exists, however, for determining a fair exchange rate in such a merger. Unlike that of a corporation, the value of a cryptocurrency is driven by network effects, so the exchange rate itself influences the value of the merged asset. We extend the exchange-ratio framework of Mainini, Moretto and Visetti [7] by making the merged value endogenous: the exchange rate determines community migration, migration determines (up to user overlap) the post-merger network state, and an axiomatised valuation function assigns a value to that state. The resulting synergy has no predetermined sign, and the bounds of the bargaining region become self-referential in the exchange rate. We prove that no exchange rate at which the merger destroys value preserves wealth, and that the pre-merger price ratio preserves wealth exactly when the merger does not destroy value at that rate. In that case, under explicit threshold conditions, the price ratio satisfies all five of our fairness conditions -- wealth, adoption, security, governance and liquidity preservation -- and, under strict versions of these conditions, the admissible set contains a nondegenerate interval around it, the wealth-admissible set one of explicit width. The network-value laws proposed in the literature, from the linear law to Metcalfe's and its generalised power-law forms, share a convexity property that yields the Lipschitz control behind these estimates. Liquidity emerges as the only non-wealth condition that can disconnect the admissible set.

q-fin.GN↗

Firm Valuation When AI Shapes the Business Model: A Milestone-Based Real-Options Framework for the AI Valuation Uncertainty Problem

Standard valuation methods, including discounted cash flow, the income approach standard IDW S 1 of the Institute of Public Auditors in Germany, and market multiples, compress milestone probabilities, continuation options, and risk shifts into opaque aggregate parameters; none provides a structured protocol for decomposing AI integration into auditable option-level assumptions. We propose an industry-agnostic taxonomy separating AI Integrators from AI Providers. AI Integrators are further classified by their Integration Depth Level, ranging from no integration to AI at the core of the product or process. A milestone-gated real-options overlay decomposes milestone state value into five components, and an Analytic Hierarchy Process-based Success Readiness Index derives per-option probabilities from structured pairwise comparisons for scenario analysis. Applied to an AI-native energy software-as-a-service firm, the framework yields a coherent valuation band traceable to identifiable option-level assumptions. Risk concentrates in later-stage continuation options, matching the structural prediction for AI Providers. The protocol applies across the firm lifecycle, including mergers and acquisitions due diligence. The case is a single-firm demonstration of protocol coherence, not empirical validation; multi-case testing against realised post-exit valuations is left to future research.

q-fin.GN↗

Compliant AI Infrastructure for Regulated Finance: A tiered multi-agent framework with DLT audit trails for financial operations in DACH

We present a compliance-first architecture for AI in regulated finance that treats regulation as an orientation layer rather than a deterministic ruleset. A matrix of regulatory intent and exposure provides a compact classification handle, which a governed policy compiler then maps into concrete prohibitions, obligations and runtime budgets. Prohibitions constrain feasibility and block externalisation, while obligations extend tasks with artefacts that must meet explicit admissibility criteria. Committee activation remains policy-driven and proportionate, preserving efficiency while ensuring supervisory oversight. Evidence, decisions and reason codes are bound to a permissioned DAG with deterministic timestamping, enabling replay, provenance checks and clear attribution of failure. Clause-level legal indexing with effective dates and capability-based agent routing ensure portability across DACH and the wider EU. The result is assurance by construction: compliance is embedded in execution and verifiable by auditors without sacrificing proportionality or transparency.

q-fin.GN↗