Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2504.04617

Limiting velocity and generalized Lorentz trasformations

Abstract

After a short Historical bibliographical note, in the Starting points attention will be focused on some postulates common to classical mechanics and special relativity. Starting from these premises, in the sections The deduction of the form of possible transformations and The Ignatowsky constant it will be shown that the choice between the Galilean scheme and one of the generalized Lorentz type is in fact the only possible one. In a generalized Lorentz scheme, the interactions propagate at a finite velocity VL and the form of the transformations of the space-time coordinates of the events is analogous to those of Lorentz; the only difference is that the limiting speed VL plays the role assumed by the invariance of c, the speed of light in a vacuum, in Lorentz transformations. The line of development of the arguments does not depend directly on electromagnetism, in other words we are dealing with a regulating principle for kinematics and for the set of laws of physics. The assumption VL=c can be assumed from the experimental datum of the invariance of c, i.e. from the validity of Maxwell's equations. Galileo transformations are obtained if and only if the time interval between two events is an invariant for inertial frames of reference, if this interval is not invariant then the transformations are of the generalized Lorentz type. In this framework, the experimental confirmations of the non-invariance of time intervals constitute an indirect confirmation of the generalized Lorentz transformations and therefore of the existence of a limiting velocity for the interactions. During the course of the discussion, a demonstration of the "Reciprocity Lemma" will also be presented, different and simpler than other approaches proposed in the literature [6,7,8].

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Fabiano Minni. 2025-04-06. Limiting velocity and generalized Lorentz trasformations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.04617

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Astrobiology and the Transformation of Scientific Epistemology

Astrobiology occupies an unusual position within the philosophy of science. Confronted with the n = 1 problem - having only a single example of life to study - it attempts to investigate life beyond Earth while relying entirely on Earth's biosphere as its reference point, a constraint that creates unique epistemic challenges. Unlike traditional sciences with clear predictive frameworks, astrobiology operates as what we might call a transient science: a discipline functioning without foundational certainties, relying predominantly on abductive reasoning, and confronting hypotheses that may remain untestable for decades. It is, in essence, a science of absence - of evidence, certainty, and analogy - where progress lies in refining conceptual and experimental tools to recognize unfamiliar forms of life. This positions astrobiology alongside emerging fields like artificial intelligence and cognitive science within a broader transformation of how scientific knowledge is constructed when dealing with phenomena that transcend direct empirical access.

physics.hist-ph

The wavelength of light as Thomas Young invented it

This paper documents Thomas Young's invention of a concept which he alternately refers to as the ''magnitude'', ''breadth'', ''interval'' or ''length of an undulation'' of light. First, the paper highlights that Young was first to link some concept of a wavelength to a theory of optics and to assign a precise value to this length for each component of the colour spectrum. Then, it sets out an explanation of how Young made up these values. Finally, it examines the reasons why Young introduced an optical wavelength into his theory of light, insofar as these reasons might in turn shed light on why he was first to do so.

physics.hist-ph

Before WIMPs: Neutrinos and the origins of particle dark matter

After four decades of null-results, the experimental quest to discover a dark matter particle ardently continues. While confidence in the leading candidate, the Weakly Interacting Massive Particle (WIMP), is waning, its explanatory success still shapes current experimental approaches and theoretical expectations - from underground detecting efforts in Europe, China, and the U.S. to modern theories of cosmic structure. This paper traces the origins of this particle-based paradigm to a critical predecessor: the neutrino-dominated universe. Proposed in the early 1970s as a solution to extra-galactic anomalies, neutrinos became the leading explanation of 'missing matter' following experimental hints of neutrino mass in 1980. Although short-lived, the model's coherent picture of cosmic evolution and structure formation set strong conceptual and methodological standards - providing critical impetus to the field of particle cosmology. Examining this history invites renewed reflection on how such past aims and expectations continue to guide dark matter inquiry today.

physics.hist-ph