Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2504.11941

Admissible matchings and the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of square-free powers

Abstract

Let $I$ be any square-free monomial ideal, and $\mathcal{H}_I$ denote the hypergraph associated with $I$. Refining the concept of $k$-admissible matching of a graph defined by Erey and Hibi, we introduce the notion of generalized $k$-admissible matching for any hypergraph. Using this, we give a sharp lower bound on the (Castelnuovo-Mumford) regularity of $I^{[k]}$, where $I^{[k]}$ denotes the $k^{\text{th}}$ square-free power of $I$. In the special case when $I$ is equigenerated in degree $d$, this lower bound can be described using a combinatorial invariant $\mathrm{aim}(\mathcal{H}_I,k)$, called the $k$-admissible matching number of $\mathcal{H}_I$. Specifically, we prove that $\mathrm{reg}(I^{[k]})\ge (d-1)\mathrm{aim}(\mathcal{H}_I,k)+k$, whenever $I^{[k]}$ is non-zero. Even for the edge ideal $I(G)$ of a graph $G$, it turns out that $\mathrm{aim}(G,k)+k$ is the first general lower bound for the regularity of $I(G)^{[k]}$. In fact, when $G$ is a forest, $\mathrm{aim}(G,k)$ coincides with the $k$-admissible matching number introduced by Erey and Hibi. Next, we show that if $G$ is a block graph, then $\mathrm{reg}(I(G)^{[k]})= \mathrm{aim}(G,k)+k$, and this result can be seen as a generalization of the corresponding regularity formula for forests. Additionally, for a Cohen-Macaulay chordal graph $G$, we prove that $\mathrm{reg}(I(G)^{[2]})= \mathrm{aim}(G,2)+2$. Finally, we propose a conjecture on the regularity of square-free powers of edge ideals of chordal graphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Trung Chau, Kanoy Kumar Das, Amit Roy, Kamalesh Saha. 2025-04-16. Admissible matchings and the Castelnuovo-Mumford regularity of square-free powers. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11941

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

On triviality of $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms admitting a nontrivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action

T. Kambayashi had shown that $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms over separable field extensions are necessarily polynomial rings. However, there exist inseparable $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms which are not necessarily polynomial rings. In this paper, we give a structure theorem for $\mathbb{A}^2$-forms over arbitrary field extensions admitting a nontrivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action. From this structure theorem we derive some conditions under which an $\mathbb{A}^2$-form becomes trivial. In particular, we prove that over a field $k$, a factorial $\mathbb{A}^2$-form having a $k$-rational point and a non-trivial $\mathbb{G}_a$-action is trivial and we also give examples demonstrating that none of these hypotheses can be discarded. As a consequence of the structure theorem, we obtain a generalization of the Zariski Cancellation Theorem for the affine plane over an arbitrary field.

math.AC

Symbolic powers of the ideal of$n$ general points in $P^{n-1}$

Problem L of Fröberg--Lundqvist--Oneto--Shapiro asks for the difference between the Hilbert series of ordinary and symbolic powers of the ideal of general points in projective space. We solve this completely for \(n\) general points of \(\PP^{n-1}\). Besides a closed formula for \[ \HS(S/I^m)-\HS(S/I^{(m)}), \] we determine all minimal monomial generators of \(I^{(m)}\), and describe the symbolic Rees algebra. We also show that containment \(I^{(m)}\subseteq I^r\) is detected solely by initial degrees. This gives the exact containment threshold, the Waldschmidt constant \(\walpha\), the resurgence \(\Res\), and the asymptotic resurgence \(\aRes\): \[ \walpha(I)=\frac{n}{n-1}, \qquad \Res(I)=\aRes(I)=\frac{2(n-1)}{n}. \] We also take the first step beyond \(n\) points: for \(n+1\) general points of \(\PP^{n-1}\) --- again a rigid, non-monomial configuration --- we identify the defining quadrics, resolve the case \(n=3\) completely (a complete intersection, with \(J^{(m)}=J^m\) for all \(m\) and resurgence \(1\)), and propose an exact Waldschmidt-constant formula \(\walpha=\frac{n+1}{n-1}\) for all \(n\), verified computationally in every case we could check.

math.AC