Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2504.12363

Fast Parameter Optimization of Delayed Feedback Reservoir with Backpropagation and Gradient Descent

Abstract

A delayed feedback reservoir (DFR) is a reservoir computing system well-suited for hardware implementations. However, achieving high accuracy in DFRs depends heavily on selecting appropriate hyperparameters. Conventionally, due to the presence of a non-linear circuit block in the DFR, the grid search has only been the preferred method, which is computationally intensive and time-consuming and thus performed offline. This paper presents a fast and accurate parameter optimization method for DFRs. To this end, we leverage the well-known backpropagation and gradient descent framework with the state-of-the-art DFR model for the first time to facilitate parameter optimization. We further propose a truncated backpropagation strategy applicable to the recursive dot-product reservoir representation to achieve the highest accuracy with reduced memory usage. With the proposed lightweight implementation, the computation time has been significantly reduced by up to 1/700 of the grid search.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sosei Ikeda, Hiromitsu Awano, Takashi Sato. 2025-04-16. Fast Parameter Optimization of Delayed Feedback Reservoir with Backpropagation and Gradient Descent. https://doi.org/10.23919/date58400.2024.10546773

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Implementation and Evaluation of NTT Arithmetic for ML-KEM on a CGLA

FIPS 203 standardizes ML-KEM for post-quantum key establishment. Its polynomial multiplication relies on NTT butterflies with exact modular arithmetic over q = 3329. Dedicated NTT accelerators minimize latency with fixed modular arithmetic and stage schedules. A CPU-Grounded Linear Array (CGLA) reuses one programmable linear datapath across several workloads. Mapping the transform to this datapath requires exact FP32 reconstruction and explicit stage transitions across the ARM-to-CGLA interface. We implement an eight-stage cyclic radix-2 driver over the ML-KEM modulus by splitting each twiddle into 8-bit and 4-bit parts before modular reduction. This driver differs from the standardized seven-layer incomplete negacyclic NTT and does not implement the full ML-KEM polynomial multiplication path. The arithmetic sequence keeps every integer below 2^24. One 41-PE call fuses the first two radix-2 stages, and six 47-PE calls execute the remaining stages while scattering outputs into next-stage records. Across four cohorts, 105 FPGA runs match all 817152 output coefficients. At batch size 64, measured FPGA end-to-end latency is 27.5 us per NTT, and the ASIC projection is 6.74 us. With PE gating, projected ASIC system energy is 10.1 uJ per NTT at batch size 8 and 58.9 uJ at batch size 64.

cs.AR↗

HBF-Sim: An Extensible HBF Simulator for Large-scale GPU Memory Systems

High-bandwidth flash (HBF) is introduced to address the memory wall, which can co-package a dense NAND stack with the GPU, targeting the performance gap between near-accelerator bandwidth and flash density. HBF, however, is neither a large HBM nor a fast NVMe SSD. Its usable bandwidth depends on how GPU cache-line requests map onto NAND pages, how concurrency spreads across channel-affine die sets, and how media management interacts with the GPU memory pipeline. To our knowledge, existing GPU, SSD, or HBF simulators cannot faithfully model this behavior. We present HBF-Sim, an extensible, reusable, and faithful HBF simulator integrated with simulated GPUs. It closes the loop between GPU issue limits, device queuing, and NAND behavior in one end-to-end request path. HBF-Sim separates a GPU-HBF interaction controller from page-based parallel stack storage, and it models the full GPU-HBF request path. It provides an MSHR-based address mapping table that merges cache-line requests into page-based operations, as well as a page-based multi-stack flash manager for highly parallel reads and writes. Validation tests and device-level microbenchmarks expose performance bottlenecks caused by limited channel distribution and resource conflicts, offering concrete guidance for next-generation HBF architectures.

cs.AR↗

VQ-LIC: Shared Vector-Quantized Learned Image Compression on a Resource-Constrained FPGA

Learned image compression (LIC) is hard to deploy on severely resource-constrained FPGAs, since how fast it actually runs depends not just on arithmetic count, but also on memory traffic, imbalance between different operations, and how the hardware batches its work. We present VQ-LIC, an asymmetric edge-cloud codec in which a compact INT8 depthwise (DW)-pointwise (PW) analysis transform and multi-codebook vector quantization (VQ) run at the edge on a reusable DW/PW engine pair, while reconstruction is handled by a larger cloud decoder. Since VQ codeword matching is expressible as a dot product, it is mapped directly onto the same PW engine, removing the need for a separate VQ compute array, to our knowledge a first for FPGA LIC. A novel latency model, derived from deterministic RTL cycle counts of an FPGA's read, DW, PW, and write costs, predicts an analysis transform's per-block latency; since VQ shares the same PW datapath, the model applies to VQ as well. Validated directly against silicon, the model predicts deployed analysis and VQ latency within 0.26\% and 0.05\%, and guides the selection of a three-block $16$-$48$-$64$ transform. Post-training codebook reduction then cuts VQ arithmetic and codebook storage by $4\times$ and shrinks the fixed-width latent representation. On a 220-DSP Zynq-7020, VQ-LIC's mid-rate preset reaches 0.1398 bits per pixel at 28.69 dB PSNR and 13.06 dB MS-SSIM on CLIC~2017, outperforming a similarly sized neural encoder and reaching a rate-distortion range comparable to a codec three orders of magnitude larger. The complete 0.1945-kMAC/pixel analysis-VQ pipeline runs at 47.98 frames per second and 42.84 mJ per frame on silicon, using an order of magnitude fewer DSPs than comparable FPGA LIC accelerators while achieving lower bitrate, higher throughput, and lower energy per frame at a modest PSNR tradeoff.

cs.AR↗