Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2504.12527

Analysis of the MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation -- Metastases (BraTS-METS) 2025 Lighthouse Challenge: Brain Metastasis Segmentation on Pre- and Post-treatment MRI

Nazanin Maleki·Raisa Amiruddin·Ahmed W. Moawad·Nikolay Yordanov·Athanasios Gkampenis·Pascal Fehringer·Fabian Umeh·Crystal Chukwurah·Fatima Memon·Bojan Petrovic·Justin Cramer·Mark Krycia·Elizabeth B. Shrickel·Ichiro Ikuta·Gerard Thompson·Lorenna Vidal·Vilma Kosovic·Adam E. Goldman-Yassen·Virginia Hill·Tiffany So·Sedra Mhana·Albara Alotaibi·Nathan Page·Prisha Bhatia·Melisa S. Guelen·Yasaman Sharifi·Marko Jakovljevic·Salma Abosabie·Sara Abosabie·Mohanad Ghonim·Mohamed Ghonim·Amirreza Manteghinejad·Anastasia Janas·Kiril Krantchev·Maruf Adewole·Jake Albrecht·Udunna Anazodo·Sanjay Aneja·Syed Muhammad Anwar·Timothy Bergquist·Veronica Chiang·Verena Chung·Gian Marco Conte·Farouk Dako·James Eddy·Ivan Ezhov·Nastaran Khalili·Keyvan Farahani·Juan Eugenio Iglesias·Zhifan Jiang·Elaine Johanson·Anahita Fathi Kazerooni·Florian Kofler·Dominic LaBella·Koen Van Leemput·Hongwei Bran Li·Marius George Linguraru·Xinyang Liu·Zeke Meier·Bjoern H Menze·Harrison Moy·Klara Osenberg·Marie Piraud·Zachary Reitman·Russell Takeshi Shinohara·Chunhao Wang·Benedikt Wiestler·Walter Wiggins·Umber Shafique·Klara Willms·Arman Avesta·Khaled Bousabarah·Satrajit Chakrabarty·Nicolo Gennaro·Wolfgang Holler·Manpreet Kaur·Pamela LaMontagne·MingDe Lin·Jan Lost·Daniel S. Marcus·Ryan Maresca·Sarah Merkaj·Gabriel Cassinelli Pedersen·Marc von Reppert·Aristeidis Sotiras·Oleg Teytelboym·Niklas Tillmans·Malte Westerhoff·Ayda Youssef·Devon Godfrey·Scott Floyd·Andreas Rauschecker·Javier Villanueva-Meyer·Irada Pflüger·Jaeyoung Cho·Martin Bendszus·Gianluca Brugnara·Gloria J. Guzman Perez-Carillo·Derek R. Johnson·Anthony Kam

Abstract

Despite continuous advancements in cancer treatment, brain metastatic disease remains a significant complication of primary cancer and is associated with an unfavorable prognosis. One approach for improving diagnosis, management, and outcomes is to implement algorithms based on artificial intelligence for the automated segmentation of both pre- and post-treatment MRI brain images. Such algorithms rely on volumetric criteria for lesion identification and treatment response assessment, which are still not available in clinical practice. Therefore, it is critical to establish tools for rapid volumetric segmentations methods that can be translated to clinical practice and that are trained on high quality annotated data. The BraTS-METS 2025 Lighthouse Challenge aims to address this critical need by establishing inter-rater and intra-rater variability in dataset annotation by generating high quality annotated datasets from four individual instances of segmentation by neuroradiologists while being recorded on video (two instances doing "from scratch" and two instances after AI pre-segmentation). This high-quality annotated dataset will be used for testing phase in 2025 Lighthouse challenge and will be publicly released at the completion of the challenge. The 2025 Lighthouse challenge will also release the 2023 and 2024 segmented datasets that were annotated using an established pipeline of pre-segmentation, student annotation, two neuroradiologists checking, and one neuroradiologist finalizing the process. It builds upon its previous edition by including post-treatment cases in the dataset. Using these high-quality annotated datasets, the 2025 Lighthouse challenge plans to test benchmark algorithms for automated segmentation of pre-and post-treatment brain metastases (BM), trained on diverse and multi-institutional datasets of MRI images obtained from patients with brain metastases.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Nazanin Maleki, Raisa Amiruddin, Ahmed W. Moawad, Nikolay Yordanov, Athanasios Gkampenis, Pascal Fehringer, Fabian Umeh, Crystal Chukwurah, Fatima Memon, Bojan Petrovic, Justin Cramer, Mark Krycia, Elizabeth B. Shrickel, Ichiro Ikuta, Gerard Thompson, Lorenna Vidal, Vilma Kosovic, Adam E. Goldman-Yassen, Virginia Hill, Tiffany So, Sedra Mhana, Albara Alotaibi, Nathan Page, Prisha Bhatia, Melisa S. Guelen, Yasaman Sharifi, Marko Jakovljevic, Salma Abosabie, Sara Abosabie, Mohanad Ghonim, Mohamed Ghonim, Amirreza Manteghinejad, Anastasia Janas, Kiril Krantchev, Maruf Adewole, Jake Albrecht, Udunna Anazodo, Sanjay Aneja, Syed Muhammad Anwar, Timothy Bergquist, Veronica Chiang, Verena Chung, Gian Marco Conte, Farouk Dako, James Eddy, Ivan Ezhov, Nastaran Khalili, Keyvan Farahani, Juan Eugenio Iglesias, Zhifan Jiang, Elaine Johanson, Anahita Fathi Kazerooni, Florian Kofler, Dominic LaBella, Koen Van Leemput, Hongwei Bran Li, Marius George Linguraru, Xinyang Liu, Zeke Meier, Bjoern H Menze, Harrison Moy, Klara Osenberg, Marie Piraud, Zachary Reitman, Russell Takeshi Shinohara, Chunhao Wang, Benedikt Wiestler, Walter Wiggins, Umber Shafique, Klara Willms, Arman Avesta, Khaled Bousabarah, Satrajit Chakrabarty, Nicolo Gennaro, Wolfgang Holler, Manpreet Kaur, Pamela LaMontagne, MingDe Lin, Jan Lost, Daniel S. Marcus, Ryan Maresca, Sarah Merkaj, Gabriel Cassinelli Pedersen, Marc von Reppert, Aristeidis Sotiras, Oleg Teytelboym, Niklas Tillmans, Malte Westerhoff, Ayda Youssef, Devon Godfrey, Scott Floyd, Andreas Rauschecker, Javier Villanueva-Meyer, Irada Pflüger, Jaeyoung Cho, Martin Bendszus, Gianluca Brugnara, Gloria J. Guzman Perez-Carillo, Derek R. Johnson, Anthony Kam. 2025-07-10. Analysis of the MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation -- Metastases (BraTS-METS) 2025 Lighthouse Challenge: Brain Metastasis Segmentation on Pre- and Post-treatment MRI. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.12527

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

2D reaction-diffusion model-based biopsy simulation for dynamic tumor growth parameter estimation

Once diagnosed, cancer requires a fast, reliable and preferably cost-efficient assessment of the current state and potential progression of the disease. A new method for estimating tumor cell diffusivity $D$ and proliferation rate $γ$ in the context of the mechanistic reaction-diffusion equation from single-point-in-time routine biopsies aims to deliver just that, and quantities computed from the parameter estimates have recently been tested as a new biomarkers for risk-stratification in radiotherapy. Here, we extend the findings of this previous work by providing a first theoretical validation. The method is applied to in-silico biopsies which are generated by solving the two-dimensional reaction-diffusion equation for different growth terms (exponential and logistic) with a Dirac-Delta initial condition, and transforming the continuous results into spatial point patterns via a form of reverse coarse-graining. If no information about tumor age is used, in short-term experiments the original dispersion length $\sqrt{D/γ}$ could be retrieved with a relative root mean squared error (RRMSE) of around 8% and an $\text{R}^2$-value of 0.97. In long-term experiments, the RRMSEs ranged from 8 to 14% and the $\text{R}^2$-values from 0.75 to 0.98. The scaled front velocity $\sqrt{D \cdotγ}$, which can only be estimated if information about tumor age is available, was retrieved with an RRMSE of 7% and an $\text{R}^2$ of 0.98 in both, the short-term and the long-term experiments.

q-bio.OT

Flash-Radiomics: A Scalable Hybrid CPU-CUDA Engine for Standardized Scalar Radiomics and Accelerated Spatial Mapping

Background and Objectives: Spatial mapping retains the spatial distribution of radiomic features, but computational cost and fragmented software limit its use. We developed Flash-Radiomics with scalar extraction and spatial mapping, a central processing unit (CPU) backend, a hybrid Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) backend, consistent feature names, and Hierarchical Data Format version 5 (HDF5) storage. Methods: We evaluated Image Biomarker Standardisation Initiative (IBSI) compliance, CPU-CUDA concordance, and end-to-end processing time. Compliance testing included 825 chapter 1 (IBSI-1) tests covering 165 high-consensus features and 323 chapter 2 (IBSI-2) tests with numerical references. Concordance testing included 1,148 scalar pairs and 93 spatial-map pairs. End-to-end processing time was measured five times per input volume of interest (VOI) size. Comparisons included the Medical Image Radiomics Processor (MIRP) and PyRadiomics for 102 shared scalar features and PyRadiomics for 93 shared spatial maps. Results: Both backends passed all 1,148 IBSI tests, and all paired results were concordant. At the largest scalar input, CPU required 76.343 s and hybrid CUDA 81.915 s; CPU was 4.7 times faster than MIRP and 190.7 times faster than PyRadiomics. At the largest spatial input completed by both backends, hybrid CUDA reduced processing time by 68.6% relative to CPU (79.280 versus 252.791 s). At PyRadiomics' largest completed spatial input, hybrid CUDA was 84.9 times faster. Conclusions: Flash-Radiomics unified standardized scalar extraction, spatial mapping, concordant CPU-CUDA results, and HDF5 storage. CPU processing time was similar or shorter for scalar extraction, whereas hybrid CUDA was faster for spatial mapping under the tested conditions.

q-bio.OT

EPI-KAN: A Method For Estimating and Forecasting Time-Dependent COVID-19 Parameters

We introduce EPI-KAN, a novel method for estimating COVID-19 time-varying parameters. EPI-KAN uses historical epidemiological data, Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN), and the novel Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN). The method harnesses the novel Kolmogorov-Arnold Network (KAN), which is a type of artificial neural network. For the KAN in this paper, we learn activation functions that are represented using Fourier series, hence we abbreviate as KAN-F. In this study, we estimate parameters in the context of an SIRD compartmental differential equations. The time-dependent parameters are the transmission rate $β(t)$, recovery rate $γ(t)$, and mortality rate $μ(t)$. We define three KAN-F functions $\widehatβ$, $\widehatγ$, $\widehatμ$ that model the true parameters $β(t)$, $γ(t)$, $μ(t)$, respectively. We test two model architectures for the KAN-F: the first has 8 input variables consisting of $S$, $I$, $R$, $D$, and their numerical gradients at any time $t$, while the second has 4 input variables excluding the numerical gradients. The objective loss function that has to be minimized is subject to Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN). Using historical data of COVID-19 from three South-East Asian countries: Indonesia, Singapore, and Malaysia, we are able to estimate $β(t)$, $γ(t)$, and $μ(t)$ on each country with decent accuracy and efficiency. The time period of choice coincides with the period where SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant (B.1.617.2) was dominant. In addition to estimating the rates during the training period, we also predict transmission rates over 30 days during forecast period. We found that the output of KAN-F over the forecast period can give good predictions if we scale the output by a factor of 17\% for Indonesia and 30\% for Singapore and Malaysia.

q-bio.OT