Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2504.14353

Goldbach Conjecture: Violation Probability and Generalization to Prime-like Distributions

Abstract

Due to the distribution of primes among integers, we establish an upper bound for the probability $\mathbb{P}_n$ that the Goldbach conjecture fails. Assuming the conjecture holds true for all even number less than $2N$, we prove this probability is less than $e^{-N^α}$, where $ α= 1 - \frac{2\ln\ln N}{\ln N}$. For large $N$, this probability becomes vanishingly small, effectively precluding the existence of counterexamples in practice. If $N =4 \times 10^{18}$, the probability of a counterexample is less than $e^{-10^{15}}$. Our approach fundamentally depends on the distributional properties of primes rather than their primality per se. This perspective enables a natural generalization of the conjecture to non-prime subsets of integers that exhibit similar distributional characteristics. As a concrete example, we construct new subsets by applying random $\pm 1$ shifts to primes, which preserve the essential prime-like distributional properties. Computational verification confirms that this generalized Goldbach conjecture holds for all even integers up to $2 \times 10^{8}$ within these modified subsets.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Ameneh Farhadian. 2025-04-19. Goldbach Conjecture: Violation Probability and Generalization to Prime-like Distributions. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14353

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Asymptotic density of k-almost primes

Landau's well known asymptotic formula $$N_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : Ω(n)=k\}\mid \ \sim \left( \frac{x}{\log x} \right) \frac{(\log\log x)^{k-1}}{(k - 1)!}\ \ (x \rightarrow \infty),$$ which also holds for $$π_k(x):=\ \mid\{n\leq x : ω(n)=k\}\mid,$$ is known to be fairly poor for $k > 1$, and when $k$ is allowed to tend to infinity with $x$, the study of $N_k(x)$ and $π_k(x)$ becomes very technical [1, Chapter II.6, $§$ 6.1, p.200]. I hope to show that the method described below provides not only a more accurate approach, but rather increases in its asymptotic accuracy as $k$ tends to infinity.

math.NT

Transcendence Meets Normality: Construction of Transcendentally Normal Numbers

In this work, we study real numbers $x$ for which $p(x)$ is (absolutely) normal for every non-constant integer-valued polynomial $p$. We call such numbers transcendentally normal. We prove that almost every real number is transcendentally normal and provide an explicit construction of such a number, based on Sierpinski's covering method and novel ideas involving the so-called stretch function. In the next step, we transform this construction into an algorithm that computes the digits of a t-normal number recursively in all integer bases. Moreover, we extend our covering approach to construct and compute LIL-normal numbers whose discrepancies are of the order predicted by the law of the iterated logarithm. We also take the opportunity to discuss several interesting open problems.

math.NT