Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2504.15153

Distribution Testing Meets Sum Estimation

Abstract

We study the problem of estimating the sum of $n$ elements, each with weight $w(i)$, in a structured universe. Our goal is to estimate $W = \sum_{i=1}^n w(i)$ within a $(1 \pm ε)$ factor using a sublinear number of samples, assuming weights are non-increasing, i.e., $w(1) \geq w(2) \geq \dots \geq w(n)$. The sum estimation problem is well-studied under different access models to the universe $U$. However, to the best of our knowledge, nothing is known about the sum estimation problem using non-adaptive conditional sampling. In this work, we explore the sum estimation problem using non-adaptive conditional weighted and non-adaptive conditional uniform samples, assuming that the underlying distribution ($D(i)=w(i)/W$) is monotone. We also extend our approach to to the case where the underlying distribution of $U$ is unimodal. Additionally, we consider support size estimation when $w(i) = 0$ or $w(i) \geq W/n$, using hybrid sampling (both weighted and uniform) to access $U$. We propose an algorithm to estimate $W$ under the non-increasing weight assumption, using $O(\frac{1}{ε^3} \log{n} + \frac{1}{ε^6})$ non-adaptive weighted conditional samples and $O(\frac{1}{ε^3} \log{n})$ uniform conditional samples. Our algorithm matches the $Ω(\log{n})$ lower bound by \cite{ACK15}. For unimodal distributions, the sample complexity remains similar, with an additional $O(\log{n})$ evaluation queries to locate the minimum weighted point in the domain. For estimating the support size $k$ of $U$, where weights are either $0$ or at least $W/n$, our algorithm uses $O\big( \frac{\log^3(n/ε)}{ε^8} \cdot \log^4 \frac{\log(n/ε)}ε \big)$ uniform samples and $O\big( \frac{\log(n/ε)}{ε^2} \cdot \log \frac{\log(n/ε)}ε \big)$ weighted samples to output $\hat{k}$ satisfying $k - 2εn \leq \hat{k} \leq k + εn$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Pinki Pradhan, Sampriti Roy. 2025-04-21. Distribution Testing Meets Sum Estimation. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15153

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Beyond Kruskal: Polynomial-Time Tensor Decomposition under the Lovitz-Petrov Condition

Identifiability criteria certify that a given tensor decomposition is a unique rank decomposition. Kruskal's classical condition is one of the best-known deterministic criteria for identifiability. However, no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm is known under the Kruskal condition, and verifying the condition itself is NP-hard. Lovitz and Petrov introduced a strictly more general identifiability condition which, in contrast, is polynomial-time verifiable, but no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm was previously known under this condition. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for tensor decomposition under the Lovitz--Petrov condition. Moreover, combining our algorithm with polynomial-time verification of the Lovitz--Petrov condition yields an efficient end-to-end certification procedure: after computing a decomposition, one can deterministically certify in polynomial time that it is unique and therefore of minimum rank. This contrasts with an arbitrary tensor decomposition, which certifies only an upper bound on the tensor rank, while determining tensor rank is NP-hard in general.

cs.DS

Poisson Exchange Beyond Submodularity: Effective Approximation Algorithms for Offline and Online Subset Selection over Matroids

Over the past decade, a growing body of research has shown that $γ$-weak submodularity broadly arises in numerous subset selection tasks, including feature selection, neural network pruning, and video summarization. Despite its prevalence, maximizing a $γ$-weakly submodular function subject to a general matroid constraint remains challenging. To date, the only known approximation guarantee is the conservative $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ factor established by \citet{chen2018weakly}. To improve upon this result, this paper proposes a novel algorithm called \MGPE, which repeatedly performs maximum-gain local exchanges through careful control of a non-homogeneous Poisson clock, and proves that this \MGPE\ can attain an approximation ratio arbitrarily close to $ρ_γ=1-\left(γ/(2-γ)\right)^{ \frac{γ^2}{2(1-γ)} }$. In sharp contrast to the previous guarantee, our obtained factor $ρ_γ$ not only strictly improves upon $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ for every $γ\in(0,1]$, but also can asymptotically approach the optimal $(1-1/e)$-approximation for submodular maximization as $γ\to1$. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that when the matroid constraint reduces to a cardinality or the objective satisfies the stronger notion of $α$-weak DR-submodularity, \MGPE\ can automatically recover the tight approximation ratios of $1-e^{-γ}$ and $1-e^{-α}$, respectively. Here, $α\in(0,1]$ denotes the DR ratio.

cs.DS

Linear-Query Deterministic Approximation for Non-monotone Submodular Maximization under a Knapsack Constraint

Submodular maximization under a knapsack constraint (SMK) is a fundamental combinatorial optimization problem with broad applications across machine learning and data mining. Motivated by large-scale applications where query efficiency is paramount, we study non-monotone SMK and focus on deterministic algorithms with linear query complexity. Prior deterministic linear-query algorithms achieve at best a $1/5-\varepsilon$ approximation, falling short of the $1/4-\varepsilon$ ratio attainable by randomized algorithms. We close this gap by presenting a deterministic $(1/4-\varepsilon)$-approximation with $O(n\log^2(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ queries. Our approach partitions the analysis based on the cost of the largest optimal element $r$: when the cost of $r$ is moderate, we refine the threshold-twin-greedy framework via residual-budget enumeration to tighten the analysis; when the cost of $r$ is large, we reduce the problem to bicriteria submodular maximization. As a secondary contribution, we obtain a $(1/2-\varepsilon, O(1/\varepsilon))$-bicriteria approximation with $O(n\log(1/\varepsilon)/\varepsilon^2)$ queries, improving over the previous $O(n^2/\varepsilon)$ query bound.

cs.DS