Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2504.15268

Causal Discovery via Simultaneous DAG Recovery Using the Angles Space of Directional Dependence Measures

Abstract

Most causal discovery algorithms utilizing a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) framework execute sequentially (e.g. constraint-based models) or iteratively (e.g. score-based or functional causal models). In contrast, we develop a new method, Angles-based Directional Dependence (ADD), that executes over the entire DAG space simultaneously, based on only two matrix estimations. We apply dual orderings on any (positive definite) directional dependence measure for all pairwise relationships, identify statistically significant directional dependence in the (positive definite) angles space, and then enforce acyclicality to make proper causal interpretations. Potential benefits of the approach include increased coherence, due to simultaneous edge-calling within a positive definite space, increased power, due to the ability to use any directional dependence measure and thus, opportunistically adapt to different or varying data conditions, and increased speed and scalability, due to the need for only two matrix estimations, and two (fast) simulations to define empirical confidence bounds under independence (regardless of the size of the DAG space). We conduct a preliminary empirical study evaluating direct adjacency under nonlinear, asymmetric, heavy-tailed data conditions. The promising results indicate applications to feature selection in quantitative finance, and justify and encourage a more extensive follow-up study to benchmark against competing algorithms to more fully test the above-mentioned potential benefits of ADD.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

JD Opdyke. 2026-08-10. Causal Discovery via Simultaneous DAG Recovery Using the Angles Space of Directional Dependence Measures. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15268

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Dynamic reinsurance via martingale transport

We formulate a dynamic reinsurance problem in which the insurer seeks to satisfy prescribed terminal moment or risk-based constraints while minimizing the $L^2$-norm of the ceded risk. As a tool for this analysis, we first use techniques from martingale optimal transport to study the auxiliary problem in which the insurer matches a given terminal distribution of the surplus process. We show that, under suitable assumptions, this auxiliary problem admits a tractable solution analogous to the Bass martingale. We then relax this condition by only requiring certain moment or risk-based constraints.

q-fin.RM↗

Risk Measures under Paired-Ambiguity: A Deep Learning Reflected BSDE Framework

We study optimal stopping under dynamic risk measures with simultaneous ambiguity in the probability model and the discount rate. We introduce a paired ambiguity framework combining Girsanov model uncertainty with cash subadditive risk evaluation and characterize the stopping value by an upper reflected backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE). We establish structural properties of the resulting stopping operator and study quadratic drivers associated with entropic risk measures, obtaining explicit stopping rules in several benchmark cases. We then develop a deep learning scheme for the reflected quadratic BSDE. The convergence analysis uses discrete reflection and truncation to reduce the quadratic problem to a globally Lipschitz system and combines reflected BSDE discretization estimates with neural network approximation errors. Numerical experiments for American options illustrate the effects of discount rate and entropic ambiguity on stopping values and exercise decisions.

q-fin.RM↗

When Is the Gini Loading More Prudent? Tail Structure and the Ordering of the Standard Deviation and the Gini Mean Difference

The standard deviation (SD) and the Gini mean difference (GMD) are the two canonical measures of variability used to load premiums, set risk margins and allocate capital, yet no universal ordering between them exists. We show that the comparison is \emph{equivalent} to asking whether the coefficient of variation of the spacing $|X-X'|$ generated by two independent copies of the risk exceeds unity, so that the exponential law -- whose spacing is again exponential -- is the universal knife-edge separating the two regimes. Reading the GMD as twice the maxiance, that is, as a second-order \emph{dual} moment in the sense of Yaari's dual theory, the problem becomes an explicit comparison of primal and dual second-order variability. We derive a closed-form representation of the mean excess function of the spacing in terms of the hazard and reverse hazard rates of $X$, and use it to prove that heavy-tailed behavior -- a decreasing hazard rate or an increasing reverse hazard rate -- yields SD dominance, whereas two-sided light tails yield GMD dominance; within the monotone aging classes, equality characterizes the exponential law. Both regimes are stable under truncation, convolution and mixing, which makes them operational in collective risk and frailty models. We classify the severity, lifetime and frequency distributions of actuarial practice accordingly, quantify the consequences for SD- and Gini-loaded premium principles and for Gini-type tail risk measures, and show that the sign of $\mathrm{SD}-\mathrm{GMD}$ across thresholds furnishes a simple diagnostic for tail aging.

q-fin.RM↗