Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2504.15993

Benchmarking machine learning models for predicting aerofoil performance

Abstract

This paper investigates the capability of Neural Networks (NNs) as alternatives to the traditional methods to analyse the performance of aerofoils used in the wind and tidal energy industry. The current methods used to assess the characteristic lift and drag coefficients include Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), thin aerofoil and panel methods, all face trade-offs between computational speed and the accuracy of the results and as such NNs have been investigated as an alternative with the aim that it would perform both quickly and accurately. As such, this paper provides a benchmark for the windAI_bench dataset published by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in the USA. In order to validate the methodology of the benchmarking, the AirfRANSdataset benchmark is used as both a starting point and a point of comparison. This study evaluates four neural networks (MLP, PointNet, GraphSAGE, GUNet) trained on a range of aerofoils at 25 angles of attack (4$^\circ$ to 20$^\circ$) to predict fluid flow and calculate lift coefficients ($C_L$) via the panel method. GraphSAGE and GUNet performed well during the training phase, but underperformed during testing. Accordingly, this paper has identified PointNet and MLP as the two strongest models tested, however whilst the results from MLP are more commonly correct for predicting the behaviour of the fluid, the results from PointNet provide the more accurate results for calculating $C_L$.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Oliver Summerell, Gerardo Aragon-Camarasa, Stephanie Ordonez Sanchez. 2025-07-22. Benchmarking machine learning models for predicting aerofoil performance. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.15993

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Cross-helicity and chaotic dynamics of full-disc solar magnetic field

Using the results of laboratory experiments and direct numerical simulations, as well as observations of the full-disc solar magnetic field and sunspot number dynamics, it is demonstrated that cross-helicity can dominate the decaying part of the frequency power spectra of the magnetic field generated by a magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) dynamo in chaotic/turbulent swirling flows for sufficiently strong MHD turbulence (including the solar dynamo). The theoretical consideration is based on a Kolmogorov-like phenomenology within the framework of the distributed chaos concept. It is also shown that the solar full-disc magnetic field for the last two solar cycles with weak magnetic activity exhibits deterministic chaotic behavior concentrated around the equator.

physics.flu-dyn

Manifestation of spurious currents and interface regularization in wind turbulence over fast-propagating waves

Accurate simulation of wind turbulence over fast-propagating waves requires interface-capturing methods that suppress numerical artifacts while accurately resolving momentum transfer across the interface. In high wave-age regimes, numerical errors at the air-water interface can reach magnitudes comparable to the physical flow, directly affecting predicted turbulence statistics. This study examines widely used interface-capturing techniques to evaluate how curvature estimation and flux discretization influence wind-wave simulations through the resulting spurious currents and interface regularization. A systematic assessment is performed using static and translating droplet benchmarks, together with solitary and monochromatic wave cases, to identify and quantify the dominant numerical error mechanisms. In addition, comparison with experimental measurements reveals how these primary error sources manifest in coupled wind-wave simulations. These findings clarify the numerical origin of the observed discrepancies and underscore the importance of accurate curvature and flux treatment in high wave-age regimes, without which numerical artifacts risk being misattributed to genuine wind-wave physics.

physics.flu-dyn

A reconfigurable multi-axis cyber-physical framework for multi-regime fluid--structure interaction experiments

Fluid--structure interaction (FSI) experiments are typically built around mechanical dynamics and constraints imposed by the physical apparatus, so changing mass, stiffness, damping, or allowable motion often requires hardware reconfiguration. Here we present a reconfigurable cyber-physical framework in which these properties are instead assigned through software-defined dynamics. The system provides three translational and one rotational degree of freedom, each independently configurable as prescribed, load-responsive, or locked, with operating roles that can also be reassigned during a running experiment. Measured forces and torques are incorporated into real-time virtual dynamic models, while a common supervisory architecture coordinates multi-axis motion, mode switching, synchronized data acquisition, and diagnostic positioning. The prescribed-motion pathway is validated using a pitching hydrofoil by comparison with published thrust and power scaling trends, while the load-responsive pathway is evaluated using an active-heave/passive-pitch benchmark that reproduces the expected frequency-dependent resonant response over the tested conditions. The same platform is then reconfigured for intra-cycle active--passive pitching, coordinated vertical-axis turbine-surrogate motion, force-driven passive surge, and automated multilayer stereoscopic particle image velocimetry. These results demonstrate that distinct FSI boundary conditions and measurement requirements can be implemented within a common motion, sensing, and control architecture. By treating mechanical roles and constraints as software-defined experimental variables, the framework provides a reusable basis for reconfigurable FSI experiments without redesigning the underlying platform for each application.

physics.flu-dyn