Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2504.21624

Multicut Problems in Almost-Planar Graphs: The Dependency of Complexity on the Demand Pattern

Florian Hörsch·Dániel Marx
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Given a graph $G$, a set $T$ of terminal vertices, and a demand graph $H$ on $T$, the \textsc{Multicut} problem asks for a set of edges of minimum weight that separates the pairs of terminals specified by the edges of $H$. The \textsc{Multicut} problem can be solved in polynomial time if the number of terminals and the genus of the graph is bounded (Colin de Verdière [Algorithmica, 2017]). Focke et al.~[SoCG 2024] characterized which special cases of Multicut are fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by the number of terminals on planar graphs. Moreover, they precisely determined how the parameter genus influences the complexity and presented partial results of this form for graphs that can be made planar by the deletion of $π$ edges. We complete the picture on how this parameter $π$ influences the complexity of different special cases and precisely determine the influence of the crossing number. Formally, let $\mathcal{H}$ be any class of graphs (satisfying a mild closure property) and let Multicut$(\mathcal{H})$ be the special case when the demand graph $H$ is in $\mathcal{H}$. Our first main result is showing that if $\mathcal{H}$ has the combinatorial property of having bounded distance to extended bicliques, then Multicut$(\mathcal{H})$ on unweighted graphs is FPT parameterized by the number $t$ of terminals and $π$. For the case when $\mathcal{H}$ does not have this combinatorial property, Focke et al.~[SoCG 2024] showed that $O(\sqrt{t})$ is essentially the best possible exponent of the running time; together with our result, this gives a complete understanding of how the parameter $π$ influences complexity on unweighted graphs. Our second main result is giving an algorithm whose existence shows that the parameter crossing number behaves analogously if we consider weighted graphs.

Explore related subjects

cs.CC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Florian Hörsch, Dániel Marx. 2026-01-26. Multicut Problems in Almost-Planar Graphs: The Dependency of Complexity on the Demand Pattern. https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.21624

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Bit-counting complexity classes

We define bit-counting complexity classes whose membership depends on the binary profile of the number of accepting paths of non-deterministic polynomial time Turing machines. We study the relationship between this new family of complexity classes and the classical complexity classes. We prove that the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ is contained in our comparison based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}$, ${\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}$. We then show that the comparison based bit-counting complexity classes and the complexity class ${\bf PP}$ are Turing equivalent, that is ${\bf P}^{\bf PP} = {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|=|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|>|1|}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|<|1|}P}}$. We then prove that the complexity classes ${\bf NP}$ and ${\bf CoNP}$ are contained in both of our parity based bit-counting complexity classes ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}$ and ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}$. We also show that the Turing closures of the parity based bit-counting complexity classes coincide, that is ${\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0|\oplus}P}}={\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1|\oplus}P}}$. We do this by proving that when either parity based bit-counting complexity class is provided as an oracle for a polynomial time Turing machine, then it can simulate the other one, that is ${\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}}$ and ${\bf B_{|0| \oplus}P}\subseteq {\bf P}^{{\bf B_{|1| \oplus}P}}$.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Formalizing PARITY Circuit Lower Bounds in Lean

We formalize Hastad's PARITY lower bound in Lean using the switching lemma. For every fixed d >= 2, formulas and DAG circuits of computation depth at most d computing PARITY on n inputs require size exp(Omega_d(n^(1/(d-1)))) for all sufficiently large n. This matches the classical upper bound up to constants in the exponent and implies that PARITY is not in nonuniform AC0. We also construct a polynomial-size, logarithmic-depth bounded-fan-in formula family for PARITY, providing a witness to NC1 is not a subset of AC0 for the formalized models. The Lean source code is available at https://github.com/formalcs/circuit-complexity and is checked with Lean 4.33.1 and mathlib 4.33.1.

cs.CC↗
arXiv2026

Constant-Coin Complete-Information Debates for $\mathsf{P}$ with Arbitrarily Small Strong Error

We study complete-information debate systems in which a probabilistic finite-state verifier reads the alternating messages of a prover and a refuter. Demirci, Say, and Yakaryılmaz showed that every language in $\mathsf{P}$ has such debates checkable with a constant number of random bits and arbitrarily small weak error. Their strong-error construction, which also counts nontermination as failure, did not permit arbitrary error reduction. We close this gap: for every $L\in\mathsf{P}$ and every $\varepsilon>0$, there is a constant-space verifier using a constant number of private coin tosses that has perfect completeness and strong error at most $\varepsilon$. The verifier simulates a polynomial-time alternating multihead finite automaton, privately spot-checking one of its input heads. The key observation is that, on a nonmember, the refuter may concede any round in which the prover first misreports a head reading. This ensures termination against every prover when the refuter follows the specified strategy, and permits strong-error reduction by repetition.

cs.CC↗