Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2505.02284

Conformal Prediction for Verifiable Learned Query Optimization

Abstract

Query optimization is critical in relational databases. Recently, numerous Learned Query Optimizers (LQOs) have been proposed, demonstrating superior performance over traditional hand-crafted query optimizers after short training periods. However, the opacity and instability of machine learning models have limited their practical applications. To address this issue, we are the first to formulate the LQO verification as a Conformal Prediction (CP) problem. We first construct the CP model and obtain user-controlled bounded ranges for the actual latency of LQO plans before execution. Then, we introduce CP-based runtime verification along with violation handling to ensure performance prior to execution. For both scenarios, we further extend our framework to handle distribution shifts in the dynamic environment using adaptive CP approaches. Finally, we present CP-guided plan search, which uses actual latency upper bounds from CP to heuristically guide query plan construction. We integrated our verification framework into three LQOs (Balsa, Lero, and RTOS) and conducted evaluations on the JOB and TPC-H workloads. Experimental results demonstrate that our method is both accurate and efficient. Our CP-based approaches achieve tight upper bounds, reliably detect and handle violations. Adaptive CP maintains accurate confidence levels even in the presence of distribution shifts, and the CP-guided plan search improves both query plan quality (up to 9.84x) and planning time, with a reduction of up to 74.4% for a single query and 9.96% across all test queries from trained LQOs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Hanwen Liu, Shashank Giridhara, Ibrahim Sabek. 2025-05-04. Conformal Prediction for Verifiable Learned Query Optimization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.02284

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Towards Effective Orchestration of AI x DB Workloads

AI-driven analytics are increasingly crucial to data-centric decision-making. Executing relational and AI operators in separate runtimes prevents the database optimizer and runtime from coordinating operator ordering, model placement, batching, and state reuse. Integrating AI operators into database engines enables such coordination but raises challenges in jointly optimizing query processing and model execution, scheduling under resource contention, and reusing relational intermediates and AI artifacts. This paper formalizes AIxDB workloads as iterative, concurrent, and shareable executions that interleave relational and AI operators. We then advocate database-native orchestration as a paradigm for redesigning database engines for these workloads and distill two design principles: holistic AIxDB co-optimization and unified AIxDB cache management. We present NeurEngine as a proof-of-concept prototype and report preliminary results illustrating the performance benefits of database-native orchestration

cs.DB

Benchmarking Text-to-SQL under Role-Based Access Control

Given a database S and a natural language question Q, text-to-SQL systems aim to generate an SQL query that correctly answers Q when executed against S. Currently, popular text-to-SQL benchmarks mostly assume unrestricted access to S; in practice, however, user access is often restricted, e.g., through role-based access control (RBAC) policies. This leads to a potential disconnect between benchmarking results and real-world performance: an LLM with high benchmark scores might perform poorly in an access-controlled environment, by frequently violating RBAC, or rejecting a query q that could be answered with only permitted data in S. Motivated by this, we present a comprehensive text-to-SQL benchmarking framework with realistic RBAC constraints, which features an LLM-assisted workflow that augments existing text-to-SQL benchmarks with plausible user roles and access policies. To do so, we formulate the problem of role synthesis as a structured reasoning process over the database schema, in which the LLM first infers the application context from the schema, and then derives role responsibilities and access scopes consistent with this context. This process is audited by human-in-the-loop quality control, in which domain experts perform metric-guided screening on the generated roles. Besides the augmented dataset, the proposed framework also contains evaluation metrics that identify RBAC-specific failure modes, and disentangle SQL utility from access-control compliance. We apply the proposed framework to several widely-used benchmarks, and conduct a systematic empirical study of state-of-the-art text-to-SQL systems. The results show that many solutions (especially open-weight LLMs) with high benchmarking scores under an unrestricted setting suffer sharp performance degradation once access constraints are in place, due to frequent RBAC violations.

cs.DB

A Functional Pilot for Certified Freshness-Aware Semantic--Spatial Range Retrieval

Geographic applications need every object inside a radius that satisfies a semantic threshold, yet embedding indexes return approximate top-ranked lists and may omit qualifying records silently. We present FRESH-GEORANGE, a semantic- spatial range design that separates source-watermark freshness from optional record age. Geographic cells and semantic mi- croblocks provide admissible pruning bounds; a graph proposes verification order but supplies no correctness evidence. Exact mode scans every nonprunable block and the delta overlay. Certified mode may stop early and reports a deterministic query- specific recall lower bound from verified answers and unresolved records. A reproducible CPU pilot uses 2,500 real OpenFlights airport records, a 2,000-record base, and 740 simulated insert, delete, and text-revision events; it evaluates 180 unique queries over five seeds. Exact mode achieved 100.00% set recall on every query. The 95-percent mode achieved 99.91% empirical mean recall with a 99.41% reported mean certificate and no observed bound violation. However, its 7.24 ms median latency was 5.85 times the 1.24 ms spatial-first exact baseline, and full-history delta replay became slower than rebuilding at larger batches. The prototype therefore validates the completeness mechanism, not performance superiority or production freshness. Submission- scale evaluation requires real map diffs, official recent baselines, and truly incremental versioned maintenance.

cs.DB