Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2505.07226

How Does Monetary Policy Influence the U.S. Treasury Bond Yields, and What are the Implications for Portfolio Managers?

Minnie Zhu·Yuhan Liu·Simon Gong
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of monetary policy surprises on U.S. Treasury bond yields and the implications for portfolio managers. Based on the supply and demand model, traditional economic theories suggest that Federal Reserve bond purchases should increase bond prices and decrease yields. However, New Keynesian models challenge this view, proposing that bond prices should not necessarily rise due to future expectations influencing investor behavior. By analyzing the effects of monetary policy surprises within narrow windows around Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) announcements, this study aims to isolate the true impact of these surprises on bond yields. The research covers Treasury bonds of various maturities--3 months, 1 year, 10 years, and 30 years--and utilizes cross-sectional regression analysis. The findings reveal that financial crises significantly decrease short-term yields, while no obvious evidence of factors that might affect long-term yields. This paper provides insights into how monetary policy influences bond yields and offers practical implications for portfolio management, particularly during quantitative easing and financial crises.

Explore related subjects

econ.GNq-fin.EC

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Minnie Zhu, Yuhan Liu, Simon Gong. 2025-05-12. How Does Monetary Policy Influence the U.S. Treasury Bond Yields, and What are the Implications for Portfolio Managers?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.07226

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Local Media and the Shaping of Social Norms: Evidence from the Ebola outbreak

Media's influence on norms and behavior is widely recognized. Less is known about the role played by media being local. I examine this in a high-stakes context, the Ebola outbreak in Guinea. I exploit quasi-random variation in access to radio and the timing of a public-health campaign aired on community radio. I find that 12-17% of Ebola cases could have been prevented if places with access to a neighboring community radio station had instead had their own. Impacts are driven by radio being local rather than by ethno-linguistic belonging. Local media facilitates coordination in behaviors observed and sanctioned locally.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

Productivity Shocks and Input Misallocation: A Decomposition

This paper asks how much input misallocation productivity uncertainty generates and at which stage of input decisions it arises. I separate revenue productivity by when each component is revealed and trace each into the gap between an input's marginal revenue product and its price. In six European countries, shocks revealed after an input is committed account for 20 percent of capital gap dispersion and 5 percent of labor gap dispersion. An unanticipated one percent rise in productivity raises the capital gap by 0.92 percent and the labor gap by 0.19 percent, because most of the shock passes into the wage.

econ.GN↗
arXiv2026

When Do Type-Specific Wages Buffer Distributional Incidence in TANK?

When do relative wages buffer the unequal incidence of aggregate shocks? I derive a consumption-gap decomposition and a present-value condition for partial offset in a TANK model. An extension separates wage-setting demand elasticity from substitution between labor segments and allows each segment to contain both financial types. With a zero inherited wage gap and a same-sign discounted wedge, substitution above one gives offsetting earnings reallocation; substitution below one gives amplification. The channel disappears when financial types have identical segment exposure. Numerical experiments assess these mechanisms, shock persistence, policy feedback, and aggregate-IRF matching. In the nested perfect-alignment monetary benchmark, the peak consumption gap is about two-fifths smaller under type-specific wages than under the common-wage closure. These are conditional model comparisons, not empirical effect estimates or welfare rankings.

econ.GN↗