Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2506.07821

A Note on Reconfiguration Graphs of Cliques

Abstract

In a reconfiguration setting, each clique of a graph $G$ is viewed as a set of tokens placed on vertices of $G$ such that no vertex has more than one token and any two tokens are adjacent. Three well-known reconfiguration rules have been studied in the literature: Token Jumping ($\mathsf{TJ}$), Token Sliding ($\mathsf{TS}$), and Token Addition/Removal ($\mathsf{TAR}$). Given a graph $G$ and a reconfiguration rule $\mathsf{R} \in \{\mathsf{TS}, \mathsf{TJ}, \mathsf{TAR}\}$, a reconfiguration graph of $k$-cliques of $G$, denoted by $\mathsf{R}_k(G)$, is the graph whose vertices are cliques of $G$ of size $k$ and two vertices are adjacent if one can be obtained from the other by applying $\mathsf{R}$ exactly once. In this paper, we initiate the study of structural properties of reconfiguration graphs of cliques, proving several interesting results primarily under $\mathsf{TS}$ and $\mathsf{TJ}$ rules. In particular, we establish a formula relating the clique number of $G$ and that of $\mathsf{TS}_k(G)$, and bound the chromatic number of $\mathsf{TS}_k(G)$ via that of an appropriate Johnson graph. Additionally, we present an algorithm to construct $\mathsf{TS}_{ω(G)-1}(G)$ from $\mathsf{TJ}_{ω(G)}(G)$ and derive structural properties of $\mathsf{TJ}_{ω(G)}(G)$ graphs, where $ω(G)$ denotes the clique number of $G$. Finally, we show that $\mathsf{TS}_k(G)$ is planar whenever $G$ is planar and establish bounds on the number of $3$- and $4$-cliques based on results concerning $\mathsf{TS}_k(G)$ graphs. In particular, we prove that any planar graph $G$ with $n$ vertices can contain at most $3n - 8$ triangles, which aligns with the classical bound on maximal planar graphs.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Quan N. Lam, Huu An Phan, Duc A. Hoang. 2025-12-12. A Note on Reconfiguration Graphs of Cliques. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.07821

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO