The Milieu, Science & Logic of Feedback Control

Abstract

'The cardinal sin in control is to believe that the plant is given' Karl Astrom. Astrom, a towering figure of control theory and practice and awardee of the 1993 IEEE Medal of Honor for his work on adaptive control, provides this assessment of the obstinate part of realizing a feedback controller. And yet we are exhorted to rely on solely-data-driven methods of control design skipping the modeling and plant identification phases entirely. What is going on? Whom should we trust? How do we reconcile the implied ease (or indeed avoidance) of modeling with the steely focus on robustness of the control and the capacity of feedback to accommodate uncertainty? This paper seeks to investigate this subject with the objective of appreciating not whom to trust but what are the circumstances where the direct paradigm of control design from any lightly qualified data set provides a sensible way forward. Here is a clue: It depends on the confidence of your contentions about the plant system, the detailed data themselves and your appetite for failure. The paper attempts to segue repeatedly between the broad philosophical context and hard engineering examples. To instantiate ideas and add detail to vagaries, we incorporate a number of examples, each validated by their demonstrated commercial and industrial viability and each terminating with ein Blickwinkel or perspective in German. As David Wallace-Wells poses, before investing hundreds of billions of dollars we really ought to ask what is the trillion-dollar problem which might potentially be solved. By sticking to industrially proven technologies, we hope to delineate what works suitably well in practice or was judged worthy of the risk.