Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2506.15103

How does online shopping affect offline price sensitivity?

Abstract

The rapid rise of e-commerce has transformed consumer behavior, prompting questions about how online adoption influences offline shopping. We examine whether consumers who adopt a retailer's online shopping channels become more price-sensitive in their subsequent offline purchases with that retailer. Using transaction-level data from a large Brazilian pet supplies retailer operating both online and offline, we compare "adopters" -- customers who began shopping online after a period of offline-only purchasing -- with "non-adopters" who remained offline-only. We estimate a discrete choice logit model with individual-level heterogeneity, based on an algorithm that can handle both high-dimensional fixed effects and price endogeneity. We then apply a staggered difference-in-differences approach to the estimated price elasticities and obtain the Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATT). We find that offline price sensitivity increases significantly after online adoption in three out of four product categories, particularly in items with low switching costs, such as pet hygiene. These results underscore the importance of recognizing cross-channel effects in consumer behavior and contribute to the literature on pricing and multichannel retailing by identifying online adoption as a key driver of offline price sensitivity.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shirsho Biswas, Hema Yoganarasimhan, Haonan Zhang. 2025-10-01. How does online shopping affect offline price sensitivity?. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.15103

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Local Media and the Shaping of Social Norms: Evidence from the Ebola outbreak

Media's influence on norms and behavior is widely recognized. Less is known about the role played by media being local. I examine this in a high-stakes context, the Ebola outbreak in Guinea. I exploit quasi-random variation in access to radio and the timing of a public-health campaign aired on community radio. I find that 12-17% of Ebola cases could have been prevented if places with access to a neighboring community radio station had instead had their own. Impacts are driven by radio being local rather than by ethno-linguistic belonging. Local media facilitates coordination in behaviors observed and sanctioned locally.

econ.GN

Productivity Shocks and Input Misallocation: A Decomposition

This paper asks how much input misallocation productivity uncertainty generates and at which stage of input decisions it arises. I separate revenue productivity by when each component is revealed and trace each into the gap between an input's marginal revenue product and its price. In six European countries, shocks revealed after an input is committed account for 20 percent of capital gap dispersion and 5 percent of labor gap dispersion. An unanticipated one percent rise in productivity raises the capital gap by 0.92 percent and the labor gap by 0.19 percent, because most of the shock passes into the wage.

econ.GN

When Do Type-Specific Wages Buffer Distributional Incidence in TANK?

When do relative wages buffer the unequal incidence of aggregate shocks? I derive a consumption-gap decomposition and a present-value condition for partial offset in a TANK model. An extension separates wage-setting demand elasticity from substitution between labor segments and allows each segment to contain both financial types. With a zero inherited wage gap and a same-sign discounted wedge, substitution above one gives offsetting earnings reallocation; substitution below one gives amplification. The channel disappears when financial types have identical segment exposure. Numerical experiments assess these mechanisms, shock persistence, policy feedback, and aggregate-IRF matching. In the nested perfect-alignment monetary benchmark, the peak consumption gap is about two-fifths smaller under type-specific wages than under the common-wage closure. These are conditional model comparisons, not empirical effect estimates or welfare rankings.

econ.GN