Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2506.16311

Towards Emergency Scenarios: An Integrated Decision-making Framework of Multi-lane Platoon Reorganization

Abstract

To enhance the ability for vehicle platoons to respond to emergency scenarios, a platoon distribution reorganization decision-making framework is proposed. This framework contains platoon distribution layer, vehicle cooperative decision-making layer and vehicle planning and control layer. Firstly, a reinforcement-learning-based platoon distribution model is presented, where a risk potential field is established to quantitatively assess driving risks, and a reward function tailored to the platoon reorganization process is constructed. Then, a coalition-game-based vehicle cooperative decision-making model is put forward, modeling the cooperative relationships among vehicles through dividing coalitions and generating the optimal decision results for each vehicle. Additionally, a novel graph-theory-based Platoon Disposition Index (PDI) is incorporated into the game reward function to measure the platoon's distribution state during the reorganization process, in order to accelerating the reorganization process. Finally, the validation of the proposed framework is conducted in two high-risk scenarios under random traffic flows. The results show that, compared to the baseline models, the proposed method can significantly reduce the collision rate and improve driving efficiency. Moreover, the model with PDI can significantly decrease the platoon formation reorganization time and improve the reorganization efficiency.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Aijing Kong, Chengkai Xu, Xian Wu, Xinbo Chen, Peng Hang. 2025-06-19. Towards Emergency Scenarios: An Integrated Decision-making Framework of Multi-lane Platoon Reorganization. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.16311

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Optimization without Future Compromises? Decentralized Coordination via Collective and Reinforcement Learning

Efficient resource allocation in multi-agent systems requires autonomous agents to coordinate their decisions while balancing system-wide objectives with individual costs. This becomes increasingly challenging over long time horizons, where decisions that improve the current allocation may compromise future resource allocation, while decentralized agents have limited observations of the overall system. Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) can learn such long-term dependencies via local observations, but directly applying it to large-scale coordination leads to rapidly growing decision spaces and inefficient training. To this end, we propose Hierarchical Reinforcement and Collective Learning (HRCL), a hierarchical framework that uses MARL to guide, rather than replace, decentralized multi-agent coordination. At the high level, MARL learns strategies that restrict the alternatives considered during coordination and guide agents in balancing system-wide and individual objectives. At the low level, agents perform efficient decentralized coordination under this strategic guidance. This separation reduces the learning space and allows short-term coordination trade-offs to be evaluated according to their long-term effects. Experiments on a synthetic benchmark show that HRCL converges substantially faster than standalone MARL and reduces system-wide and individual costs by 35.53% and 27.05%, respectively. Evaluations on energy self-management and drone swarm sensing further show improved resource allocation, power-peak regulation, and sensing efficiency. These results show that learning strategic guidance for an existing coordination process can retain scalable decentralized coordination without letting short-term decisions compromise future resource allocation.

cs.MA

RideSkill: A Hierarchical Algorithm for Generalized Ride Sharing with LLM-Driven Automatic Evolution

Ride-sharing, which allows multiple passengers with different origin-destination (OD) pairs to share a single vehicle, is a challenging operational problem, as it requires orders with different OD pairs to be efficiently bundled and assigned to vehicles under uncertain and varying scenarios. Although multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) solutions have achieved promising performance, they suffer from limited generalization (adapting to different environmental scenarios), low transferability (adapting to different platform objectives), and training difficulties in large-scale systems, such as the curse of dimensionality. Recently, motivated by the scaling of large language models (LLMs), several works have incorporated LLMs into ride-hailing systems, either by employing LLMs directly as decision-making agents or using them for automatic algorithm design. However, none of these approaches support vehicle sharing, which complicates the problem by expanding both the state and action spaces exponentially. Moreover, most of them require frequent LLM calls at inference time, making them infeasible for real-time deployment. To address these issues, we propose RideSkill, a hierarchical method for ride-sharing that leverages LLM-assisted automatic algorithmic design. RideSkill consists of a combiner that assigns appropriate skills to each vehicle from a learned skill repository, enabling adaptive dispatch under varying scenarios and objectives, and a repositioner that sequentially relocates idle vehicles to emerging regions, avoiding conflicts among vehicles. Crucially, the skill repository, combiner, and repositioner are all trained by an LLM-based automatic evolutionary method, eliminating the need for LLM calls during deployment and thus ensuring high real-time performance.

cs.MA

Anchor and Perturb: Lazy Agent Remediation by Exploration Injection

Anchor and Perturb (AnP) is a lightweight framework that resolves multi-agent coordination failures by decoupling exploratory variance injection from recurrent manifold stability. Existing remediation strategies predominantly alter mixing network architectures or enforce simultaneous exploration across the collective, which inevitably precipitates severe temporal-difference penalties in non-monotonic reward spaces. Specifically, AnP isolates underperforming lazy agents and injects an asymmetric exploratory pulse into targeted coordinates whilst anchoring converged teammates to nominal greedy exploitation. Empirical telemetry benchmarks demonstrate that AnP successfully rescues collapsed joint policies (recovering from a 5% evaluation win rate nadir back to 85%) and facilitates escape from suboptimal coordination plateaus, sustaining peak win rates of 90% without requiring structural network modifications.

cs.MA