Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2506.17524

Coordinate-wise splitting algorithms for ODE simulation via Koopman-Lie product formulas

Arun Banjara·Ibrahem AlJabea·Theodore Papamarkou·Frank Neubrander
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

We present a computational framework for simulating finite-dimensional ordinary differential equations by combining classical Koopman-Lie product formulas with coordinate-wise frozen subflows. The setting is model-known, since the vector field is assumed to be available, and no data-driven approximation of the Koopman operator is attempted. Under standard assumptions, the Koopman-Lie generator associated with the flow admits a coordinate decomposition into partial generators. This decomposition leads to elementary updates in which all but one state variable are frozen, and the resulting frozen scalar subproblems are evaluated either in closed form or by one-dimensional solves. Lie-Trotter, Strang, and higher-order exponential compositions are then converted into state-update algorithms for two- and three-dimensional systems, with the semigroup and product-formula theory used as background justification for the constructions. We also record the exponential-term counts produced by the recursive constructions used in the implementation. These counts are presented as implementation costs. Numerical experiments on the Lotka-Volterra, Van der Pol, and Lorenz systems compare the coordinate-wise splitting algorithms with high-accuracy RK45 reference solutions using root-mean-square errors and work-precision curves. The results illustrate the practical trade-off between splitting order, number of time steps, number of exponential factors, and runtime.

Explore related subjects

math.NAcs.NAmath.DS

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arun Banjara, Ibrahem AlJabea, Theodore Papamarkou, Frank Neubrander. 2026-06-01. Coordinate-wise splitting algorithms for ODE simulation via Koopman-Lie product formulas. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.17524

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

How many continuous measurements are needed to learn a vector?

One can recover vectors from $\mathbb{R}^m$ with arbitrary precision, using only $\lceil \log_2(m)\rceil +1$ continuous measurements that are chosen adaptively. This surprising result is explained and discussed, and we present applications to infinite-dimensional approximation problems.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

IterativeCUR: Large Rank-Adaptive Approximation From a Small Recycled Sketch

The computation of accurate low-rank matrix approximations is central to improving the scalability of various techniques in machine learning, uncertainty quantification, and control. Traditionally, low-rank approximations are constructed using SVD-based approaches such as truncated SVD or Randomized SVD. Although these SVD approaches---especially Randomized SVD---have proven to be very computationally efficient, other low-rank approximation methods can offer even greater performance. One such approach is the CUR decomposition, which forms a low-rank approximation using direct row and column subsets of a matrix. Because CUR uses direct matrix subsets, it is also often better able to preserve native matrix structures like sparsity or non-negativity than SVD-based approaches and can facilitate data interpretation in many contexts. This paper introduces IterativeCUR, which draws on previous work in randomized numerical linear algebra to build a new algorithm that is highly competitive compared to prior work. IterativeCUR is adaptive in the sense that it takes as an input parameter the desired tolerance $ε$ and outputs (with arbitrarily high probability) an approximation of error bounded by $ε$, rather than requiring an a priori guess of the numerical rank. IterativeCUR typically runs significantly faster than both existing CUR algorithms and techniques such as Randomized SVD. Its asymptotic complexity is $\mathcal{O}(mn + (m+n)r^2)$ for an $m\times n$ matrix of output rank $r$. IterativeCUR relies on a single small sketch from the matrix that is successively downdated as the algorithm proceeds. We demonstrate through extensive experiments that IterativeCUR achieves up to $4\times$ speed-up over state-of-the-art pivoting-on-sketch approaches with no loss of accuracy, and up to $40\times$ speed-up over rank-adaptive randomized SVD approaches.

math.NA↗
arXiv2026

Multigrid with Linear Storage Complexity

As the discretization error for the solution of a partial differential equation (PDE) decreases, the precision required to store the corresponding coefficients naturally increases. Storing the solution's finite element coefficients explicitly requires $\mathcal O(n \log n)$ bits of storage, where $n$ is the number of degrees of freedom (DoFs). This paper presents a full multigrid method to compute the solution in a compressed format that reduces the storage complexity of the solution and intermediate vectors to $\mathcal O(n)$ bits. This reduction allows a matrix-free implementation to solve elliptic PDEs with an overall linear space complexity. For problems limited by the memory capacity of current supercomputers, we expect a memory footprint reduction of about an order of magnitude compared to state-of-the-art mixed-precision methods. We demonstrate the applicability of our algorithm by solving two model problems. Depending on the PDE and polynomial degree, but irrespective of the problem size, the solution vector on the finest grid requires between 4 and 12 bits per DoF, and the residual and correction require 3 to 6 bits each. Additional data is stored on the coarse grids with modestly increasing bit widths toward coarser grids.

math.NA↗