Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2506.20513

Fast ground penetrating radar dual-parameter full waveform inversion method accelerated by hybrid compilation of CUDA kernel function and PyTorch

Lei Liu·Chao Song·Liangsheng He·Silin Wang·Xuan Feng·Cai Liu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

This study proposes a high-performance dual-parameter full waveform inversion framework (FWI) for ground-penetrating radar (GPR), accelerated through the hybrid compilation of CUDA kernel functions and PyTorch. The method leverages the computational efficiency of GPU programming while preserving the flexibility and usability of Python-based deep learning frameworks. By integrating customized CUDA kernels into PyTorch's automatic differentiation mechanism, the framework enables accurate and efficient inversion of both dielectric permittivity and electrical conductivity. Experimental evaluations on synthetic data and real wavefield data demonstrate that the proposed method achieves dual-parameter FWI for GPR data while maintaining high accuracy. Moreover, the framework is flexible and extensible, supporting optional regularization strategies such as total variation and multi-scale inversion. These features make the proposed approach a practical and scalable framework for rapid GPR-based subsurface imaging in applications including civil engineering, environmental monitoring, and geophysical exploration.

Explore related subjects

physics.geo-phcs.LGeess.SP

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Lei Liu, Chao Song, Liangsheng He, Silin Wang, Xuan Feng, Cai Liu. 2025-06-25. Fast ground penetrating radar dual-parameter full waveform inversion method accelerated by hybrid compilation of CUDA kernel function and PyTorch. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20513

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

SPBench: A Multi-Task Evaluation Benchmark for Exploration Seismic Processing

Exploration seismic processing underpins subsurface imaging and resource exploration, but learning-based methods remain difficult to compare across studies. Our survey of 368 papers finds widespread reliance on private or difficult-to-reproduce datasets, with only 25 providing public code. This obscures whether reported gains arise from model design or experimental settings. We introduce the Seismic Processing Benchmark (SPBench), covering six tasks: random noise attenuation, trace interpolation, ground-roll suppression, multiple suppression, deblending, and first-arrival picking. We reproduce 24 supervised methods on 10 datasets under 43 standardized settings and release datasets, implementations, configurations, evaluation scripts, and results. To complement global scores and per-trace pick errors, we introduce signal-component-resolved evaluation (SCoRE) for reconstruction and a reference-free ridge-curvature score (RC_norm) for first-arrival picking. Our analyses show that synthetic rankings do not reliably predict field rankings, with task-dependent agreement when models train within each setting. As degradation strengthens, rankings reorder more under coherent ground roll than under random-like interference. The ridge score agrees with MAE-based model rankings in the evaluated settings, with a mean Kendall correlation of 0.881 across three field surveys, while SCoRE reveals frequency- and energy-dependent differences hidden by global scores. SPBench provides a reproducible basis for comparing learning-based seismic processing methods and characterizes how their relative advantages vary across data settings, degradation strengths, and evaluation criteria.

physics.geo-ph↗
arXiv2026

Assessing foundational atomistic models for iron alloys under Earth's core conditions

We assess the capability of recently developed foundational atomistic models (FAMs) to simulate iron alloys under the extreme pressures and temperatures of Earth's core. Static equations of state for hexagonal close-packed (hcp) and body-centered cubic (bcc) iron, computed using 17 FAMs, are benchmarked against ab initio calculations. Two representative models, MatterSim and MACE, are further evaluated for their ability to reproduce phonon spectra, liquid structure, and melting relations of iron at core conditions. While both models capture several key properties, MACE substantially overestimates the stability of bcc iron and fails to correctly describe the stability of hcp iron. Their performance is also examined for binary liquids, superionic phases, and a seven-component Fe-Ni-Si-S-O-H-C liquid. Although these FAMs were not explicitly trained on data from core conditions, they can reproduce several structural and dynamical properties across a wide range of compositions. However, none of the tested models consistently reproduces all first-principles benchmarks. By analyzing the origins of these discrepancies, we identify several limitations of current FAMs, particularly the lack of an explicit treatment of thermal electronic excitations, which significantly affect phase stability and thermodynamic properties under core conditions. We further discuss directions for improving FAMs to enable predictive simulations of core-forming materials under extreme conditions.

physics.geo-ph↗
arXiv2026

Time-Resolved Surface-Fault Displacement During the 2026 Kumamoto Earthquake From Near-Fault Video

Video recordings can reveal how rapidly fault displacement develops at the Earth's surface, but camera motion and recording artifacts can obscure the ground signal. We analyze a secondary copy of security-camera footage that captured surface displacement during the 28 July 2026 Kumamoto earthquake; the native recording was unavailable and could not be recovered. Two independent image-tracking methods were used. Optical flow follows identifiable image features, whereas normalized cross-correlation (NCC) template matching follows fixed image patches by their similarity. Both measured target-region motion relative to spatially separated reference regions while correcting motion shared by the recording. Image displacement was calibrated to the magnitude of the field-measured offset vector: 1.05 m right-lateral and 0.90 m east-side-up, or 1.383 m in total. We characterize the principal rise by the time required for displacement to progress from 20% to 80% of the selected final level. Across prespecified endpoint choices, optical flow gives 0.866-0.901 s and NCC gives 0.910-0.928 s. These durations correspond to average rates of 0.920-0.958 and 0.895-0.912 m/s, respectively. Checks using independently published tracking windows reproduce the displacement scale, although exact timing is more sensitive in spatially restricted tests. The record also shows an early apparent peak and decline followed by renewed apparent horizontal displacement. Because that later motion may represent either continued ground displacement or the geometry of the secondary recording, neither the permanent endpoint nor physical overshoot can be determined. The most robust conclusion is that the central part of the surface displacement developed in approximately 0.9 s at an average rate near 0.9 m/s.

physics.geo-ph↗