Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2507.09642

Rethinking LSM-tree based Key-Value Stores: A Survey

Abstract

LSM-tree is a widely adopted data structure in modern key-value store systems that optimizes write performance in write-heavy applications by using append writes to achieve sequential writes. However, the unpredictability of LSM-tree compaction introduces significant challenges, including performance variability during peak workloads and in resource-constrained environments, write amplification caused by data rewriting during compactions, read amplification from multi-level queries, trade-off between read and write performance, as well as efficient space utilization to mitigate space amplification. Prior studies on LSM-tree optimizations have addressed the above challenges; however, in recent years, research on LSM-tree optimization has continued to propose. The goal of this survey is to review LSM-tree optimization, focusing on representative works in the past five years. This survey first studies existing solutions on how to mitigate the performance impact of LSM-tree flush and compaction and how to improve basic key-value operations. In addition, distributed key-value stores serve multi-tenants, ranging from tens of thousands to millions of users with diverse requirements. We then analyze the new challenges and opportunities in these modern architectures and across various application scenarios. Unlike the existing survey papers, this survey provides a detailed discussion of the state-of-the-art work on LSM-tree optimizations and gives future research directions.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Yina Lv, Qiao Li, Quanqing Xu, Congming Gao, Chuanhui Yang, Xiaoli Wang, Chun Jason Xue. 2025-07-13. Rethinking LSM-tree based Key-Value Stores: A Survey. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.09642

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Access Paths for Efficient Ordering with Large Language Models

In this work, we present the \texttt{LLM ORDER BY} semantic operator as a logical abstraction and conduct a systematic study of its physical implementations. First, we propose several improvements to existing semantic sorting algorithms and introduce a semantic-aware external merge sort algorithm. Our extensive evaluation reveals that no single implementation offers universal optimality on all datasets. From our evaluations, we observe a general scaling relationship between sorting cost and the ordering quality for comparison-based algorithms. Building on these insights, we design a budget-aware optimizer that utilizes heuristic rules, LLM-as-Judge evaluation, and consensus aggregation to dynamically select the near-optimal access path for LLM ORDER BY. In our extensive evaluations, our optimizer consistently achieves ranking accuracy on par with or superior to the best static methods across all benchmarks. We believe that this work provides foundational insights into the principled optimization of semantic operators essential for building robust, large-scale LLM-powered analytic systems.

cs.DB

Expressive Power of Property Graph Constraint Languages

We present the first principled and systematic study of the expressive power of property graph constraint languages, focused on the recent PG-Keys language, set to inform the upcoming revision of the GQL standard. To this end, we position PG-Keys within the broader landscape of existing formalisms. In particular, we compare PG-Keys with two core property graph constraint languages: Graph Functional Dependencies (GFD) and Graph Generating Dependencies (GGD). One hurdle is that these formalisms allow different kinds of graph pattern languages and data predicates. To make a fair comparison, based on their structural differences only, we first present a unifying framework. Within this framework, we consider conjunctive regular path queries (CRPQ) as graph patterns with equality and inequality predicates. We then identify well-behaved fragments, establish expressiveness inclusion, and prove separation results, yielding a complete and strict hierarchy of expressive power. The results identify precisely when PG-Keys provide strictly greater expressive power, clarifying their place among state-of-the-art property graph constraint formalisms.

cs.DB

Answering Conjunctive Queries with Aggregations under Updates

Dynamic query processing keeps query answers up to date during insertions and deletions. For conjunctive queries (CQs) under set semantics, the classes maintainable in constant amortized time are known exactly: the $q$-hierarchical CQs under arbitrary updates, and the free-connex CQs under insertion-only updates. Many analytics tasks, including \textsf{SUM}/\textsf{COUNT} aggregations, provenance, and access control, are captured by evaluating a CQ over a positive commutative semiring. We thus ask whether aggregation changes what can be maintained efficiently, and if so, when. Under \emph{insertion-only} updates, it does: the boundary retreats from free-connex to a new class we call \emph{strong-connex}, with $q\text{-hierarchical} \subsetneq \text{strong-connex} \subsetneq \text{free-connex} \subsetneq \text{acyclic}$. For every \emph{strictly monotone} semiring, including the sum-product and tropical semirings, no free-connex but non-strong-connex CQ is maintainable in $O(|D|^{1/2-ε})$ time under the OuMv and OMv conjectures, whereas every strong-connex CQ is maintainable in $O(1)$ amortized time over every semiring. Under \emph{arbitrary} updates, the boundary stays at the $q$-hierarchical CQs for every semiring with $O(1)$-deletable aggregates, and maintenance over any semiring is at least as hard as over the Boolean semiring. We further strengthen the lower bounds to semirings that fall outside the class and to query with different \emph{height} and \emph{dimension}, under the combinatorial $k$-clique and generalized OuMv conjectures. All upper bounds come from a single framework, obtained by adapting CROWN to annotated relations; together with the lower bounds, they yield dichotomies parameterized by both the query and the semiring, recovering the Boolean results as a special case.

cs.DB