Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2507.12843

Are Two Datasets Close Enough With Statistical Significance? A Kernel Distributional Closeness Testing Approach

Zhijian Zhou·Liuhua Peng·Xunye Tian·Mingming Gong·Feng Liu
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Are two distributions close to each other with statistical significance? Distribution closeness testing (DCT) formalizes this question by testing whether the distance between a distribution pair is at least epsilon-far. Existing DCT methods mainly measure discrepancies between distribution pairs defined on discrete spaces, for example using total variation, which limits their application to complex data such as images. To extend DCT to more types of data, a natural idea is to introduce maximum mean discrepancy (MMD), a powerful measure of distributional discrepancy between complex distributions, into DCT scenarios. However, empirical results indicate that many distribution pairs can have the same MMD value despite having different norms in the same reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). These pairs may exhibit different finite-sample distinguishability and reflect different practical closeness levels, making MMD less informative for DCT. To mitigate this issue, we design a new measure of distributional discrepancy, norm-adaptive MMD (NAMMD), which scales the MMD value using the RKHS norms of distributions. Based on the asymptotic distribution of NAMMD, we propose NAMMD-based DCT to assess the closeness level of a distribution pair. Theoretically, we prove that NAMMD-based DCT has higher test power than MMD-based DCT while maintaining bounded type-I error. This is further validated by extensive experiments on multiple types of data, including synthetic noise and real images. Our code is available at https://github.com/zhijianzhouml/NAMMD.

Explore related subjects

cs.LGstat.ML

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Zhijian Zhou, Liuhua Peng, Xunye Tian, Mingming Gong, Feng Liu. 2026-06-07. Are Two Datasets Close Enough With Statistical Significance? A Kernel Distributional Closeness Testing Approach. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.12843

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Analysis of Regularized Learning in Banach Spaces for Linear-functional Data

This article delves into the study of the theory of regularized learning in Banach spaces for linear-functional data. It encompasses discussions on representer theorems, pseudo-approximation theorems, and convergence theorems. Regularized learning is designed to minimize regularized empirical risks over a Banach space. The empirical risks are calculated by utilizing training data and multi-loss functions. The input training data are composed of linear functionals in a predual space of the Banach space to capture discrete local information from multimodal data and multiscale models. Through the regularized learning, approximations of the exact solution to an unidentified or uncertain original problem are globally achieved. In the convergence theorems, the convergence of the approximate solutions to the exact solution is established through the utilization of the weak* topology of the Banach space. The theorems of regularized learning are utilized in the interpretation of classical machine learning, such as support vector machines and artificial neural networks.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

On Minimal Depth in Neural Networks

Understanding the relationship between the depth of a neural network and its representational capacity is a central problem in deep learning theory. In this work, we develop a geometric framework to analyze the expressivity of ReLU networks with the notion of depth complexity for convex polytopes. The depth of a polytope recursively quantifies the number of alternating convex hull and Minkowski sum operations required to construct it. This geometric perspective serves as a rigorous tool for deriving depth lower bounds and understanding the structural limits of deep neural architectures. We establish lower and upper bounds on the depth of polytopes, as well as tight bounds for classical families. These results yield two main consequences. First, we provide a purely geometric proof of the expressivity bound by Arora et al. (2018), confirming that $\lceil \log_2(n+1)\rceil$ hidden layers suffice to represent any continuous piecewise linear (CPWL) function. Second, we prove that, unlike general ReLU networks, convex polytopes do not admit a universal depth bound. Specifically, the depth of cyclic polytopes in dimensions $n \geq 4$ grows unboundedly with the number of vertices. This result implies that Input Convex Neural Networks (ICNNs) cannot represent all convex CPWL functions with a fixed depth, revealing a sharp separation in expressivity between ICNNs and standard ReLU networks.

cs.LG↗
arXiv2026

ELEMENT: Episodic and Lifelong Exploration via Maximum Entropy

Reinforcement learning agents depend on reward signals whose density is rarely under the designer's control, and when such signals are absent, an agent must generate its own drive to explore. State entropy maximization offers a principled objective for this, but existing methods break down at scale in two ways: the intrinsic reward vanishes once a state has been visited, discouraging revisits to the very gateways that lead onward, and estimating entropy over millions of accumulated observations becomes computationally prohibitive. We address both with Episodic and Lifelong Exploration via Maximum Entropy (ELEMENT), a multiscale intrinsically motivated framework for reward-free exploration that transfers to downstream tasks. ELEMENT couples lifelong entropy maximization with a complementary episodic term acting on a faster timescale. For the episodic term, we derive average episodic state entropy, an intrinsic reward that is the exact minimizer of a tractable upper bound on the reward-decomposition objective; for the lifelong term, we propose a $k$NN graph-based estimator that keeps entropy tractable without forgetting. ELEMENT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art intrinsic reward baselines on state coverage and unsupervised pre-training. Videos, code, and supplementary material: https://sites.google.com/view/element-rl.

cs.LG↗