Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2507.13952

Beyond Cognitive Load: AI-Based Estimation of Cognitive Effort Using Brain Signals During Digital Tasks

Abstract

Cognitive effort, defined as the relationship between cognitive load and task performance, provides insight into how individuals allocate mental resources during demanding tasks. This construct is particularly important in high-stakes public health and clinical training, where excessive cognitive load is associated with medical errors and burnout. This study investigates whether cognitive effort varies across task segments and whether it can be estimated at the individual level using brain signal data and machine learning. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data were collected from 16 participants performing a structured digital cognitive task consisting of four sequential segments separated by short and long rest intervals. Cognitive effort was operationalized using relative neural efficiency and relative neural involvement, integrating prefrontal hemodynamic activity with task performance. The analysis followed a two-stage approach. First, segment-level group analysis tested whether cognitive effort differed across task segments, assessing whether the task structure induced meaningful variation in cognitive demand. Second, participant-independent machine learning models were used to predict task performance from brain signal features. These predicted scores were then combined with neural measures to estimate individual-level cognitive effort. Results showed significant differences in cognitive effort across the four task segments, indicating that variations in task structure influence collective cognitive efficiency. In addition, machine learning models successfully predicted performance from fNIRS data. Cognitive effort derived from predicted scores closely matched that based on actual performance, suggesting that the proposed metric primarily reflects brain signal patterns.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Shayla Sharmin, Mohammad Fahim Abrar, Gael Lucero-Palacios, Aditya Raikwar, Roghayeh Leila Barmaki. 2026-04-09. Beyond Cognitive Load: AI-Based Estimation of Cognitive Effort Using Brain Signals During Digital Tasks. https://doi.org/10.32481/djph.2026.03.08

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Are explainable AI (XAI) evaluation strategies aligned? Comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical evaluation measures using saliency maps

The evaluation of explainable AI (XAI) approaches often relies on three families of methods: subjective measures (e.g., questionnaires on trust or satisfaction), objective measures (e.g., task performance metrics), and mathematical metrics (e.g., for faithfulness). Yet, it remains unclear how these families align or diverge in practice. In a{preregistered} between-subjects study (N=166), we use three established saliency map techniques (LIME, Grad-CAM, Guided Backpropagation) as a testbed to examine this issue. We find that each family of methods leads to different conclusions: participants reported no differences in trust or satisfaction, Grad-CAM improved user performance, while mathematical metrics favored Guided Backpropagation. At the same time, mathematical metrics were only partially related to user performance, and these relationships were sometimes counterintuitive. Our findings highlight the methodological importance of comparing subjective, objective, and mathematical approaches when evaluating XAI, illustrating both tensions and aspects that are aligned. We discuss implications for XAI evaluation frameworks.

cs.HC

Mind Your Ps and Qs: Positive Moderation Practice in the Positive Queue

Online communities rely on volunteer moderators to maintain order. Despite their key role, moderators are given a toolbox of punishments and far less support for encouraging contributions they want to see more of. We introduce the Positive Queue as a positive counterpart to Reddit's modqueue: a dedicated space for moderators to discover contributions and behaviors they want to encourage and positively reinforce. With five moderators, four with 6-14 years of experience, we use the Positive Queue to examine how moderators operationalize positive reinforcement. Moderators combined predicted community reception, observed engagement, and their own judgment; used prediction-engagement mismatches to identify overlooked content; and repurposed positive features for punitive and retrospective work. These findings surface tensions around labor, attribution, and community fit. We contribute the Positive Queue as a working system and conceptualize positive moderation as recognition infrastructure that shapes what moderators notice, whose judgment becomes visible, and how recognition reaches contributors.

cs.HC

PILOT: Control Surfaces for Authoring Social Media Feeds

Personalized social media feeds infer preferences from behavior, leaving people little direct control over what they see. Existing controls range from post-level reactions to rules and natural language, but little is known about how people use them together or how added expressiveness changes effort. We built PILOT, a Bluesky feed-authoring system that turns in-feed actions into explicit preferences, deterministic ranking, and inspectable outcomes. A study with seven participants informed an expanded implementation, which we organized into three nested control surfaces that ten participants compared within subjects. Participants assigned controls to distinct jobs: broad controls set direction, in-post actions refined results, and filters removed content. Richer surfaces did not necessarily feel more effortful, and participants' experiences depended more on whether they could verify and repair outcomes. Our findings show that usable feed control requires not simply more controls, but orchestration across mechanisms that support expression, inspection, repair, and episodic use.

cs.HC