Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2508.00396

Proof complexity of Mal'tsev CSP

Abstract

Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSPs) form a broad class of combinatorial problems, which can be formulated as homomorphism problems between relational structures. The CSP dichotomy theorem classifies all such problems over finite domains into two categories: NP-complete and polynomial-time, see Zhuk (2017), Bulatov (2017). Polynomial-time CSPs can be further subdivided into smaller subclasses. Mal'tsev CSPs are defined by the property that every relation in the problem is invariant under a Mal'tsev operation, a ternary operation $μ$ satisfying $μ(x, y, y) = μ(y, y, x) = x$ for all $x, y$. Bulatov and Dalmau proved that Mal'tsev CSPs are solvable in polynomial time, presenting an algorithm for such CSPs (2006). The negation of an unsatisfiable CSP instance can be expressed as a propositional tautology. We formalize the algorithm for Mal'tsev CSPs within bounded arithmetic $V^1$, which captures polynomial-time reasoning and corresponds to the extended Frege proof system. We show that $V^1$ proves the soundness of Mal'tsev algorithm, implying that tautologies expressing the non-existence of a solution for unsatisfiable instances of Mal'tsev CSPs admit short extended Frege proofs. In addition, with small adjustments, we achieved an analogous result for Dalmau's algorithm that solves generalized majority-minority CSPs -- a common generalization of near-unanimity operations and Mal'tsev operations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Azza Gaysin. 2025-08-01. Proof complexity of Mal'tsev CSP. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.00396

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Bluebirds and mockingbirds cannot produce a fixed-point combinator

Let $B$ be the bluebird combinator with reduction rule $Bxyz \to_{w} x\left(yz\right)$, let $M$ be the mockingbird combinator with reduction rule $Mx \to_{w} xx$, and let $I$ be the identity bird combinator with reduction rule $Ix \to_{w} x$. A fixed-point combinator, called a sage bird by Smullyan, is a closed term $Y$ such that, for a fresh variable $x$, $Yx$ is equivalent to $x\left(Yx\right)$ under these reduction rules. For a fixed variable $x$, we construct an invariant $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(u\right)$ of a $BMI$-term $u$ with respect to $\to_{w}$. This invariant traces the occurrences of $x$ in the leftmost-innermost reduction sequence of $u$. We then prove that $\mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(Yx\right) \neq \mathrm{Tr}_{x}\left(x^{r}\left( Yx \right)\right)$ for every $x$-free $BMI$-term $Y$ and every $r\geq 1$. Consequently, there exists no fixed-point combinator in $BMI$-combinatory logic. This provides a negative answer to the problem posed by Smullyan in 1985.

math.LO

Pointwise provable equality and the failure of composition

Montagna (1989) and Di Paola--Montagna (1991) claim that the algebraic systems $S'$ and $S'_T$, respectively, are categories. We show that the proposed composition is not independent of the choice of representatives. For every consistent recursively enumerable extension $T$ of Peano arithmetic ($\mathrm{PA}$), we exhibit two program indices that are pointwise provably equal in $T$ but yield inequivalent composites when each is run after the same program. Montagna's $S'$ is the case $T=\mathrm{PA}$. The failure already occurs for partial maps from $ω$ to itself. Weak totality and the proposed range assignment also depend on the choice of representatives. More generally, for consistent $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, pointwise provable equality is a composition congruence exactly when $T$ proves every true $Π^0_1$ sentence, in which case it is extensional equality. This completeness condition fails for every consistent recursively enumerable $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$ by Gödel's second incompleteness theorem. For every extension $T\supseteq\mathrm{PA}$, the least composition congruence containing pointwise provable equality is extensional equality if $T$ is $Σ^0_1$-sound and the universal relation otherwise.

math.LO

Compactness via Consistency Properties

We will use consistency properties to characterize strongly compact cardinals, first showing an adequate Model Existence Theorem for larger fragments.

math.LO