Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2508.01737

An analytical framework for the Levine hats problem: new strategies, bounds and generalizations

Abstract

We study the Levine hat problem, a cooperative puzzle introduced by Lionel Levine in 2010, in which $n \geq 2$ players must simultaneously identify a black hat on their own infinite stack, each seeing only their teammates' stacks. While the optimal winning probability $V_n$ remains unknown even for $n=2$, we make three key advances. First, we develop a geometric and integral framework representing strategies as Lebesgue-measurable functions, yielding a new integral expression for $V_n$ and a unified treatment of finite and infinite stacks. Second, we construct a recursive strategy $\mathscr{S}_5$ processing hats in blocks of five, which attains the conjectured optimal probability $7/20$ for two players. Although this bound was already achieved by the known strategy $\mathscr{S}_3$, the existence of $\mathscr{S}_5$ refutes the previously held expectation that recursive strategies with block size greater than three yield no improvement, and produces a strictly better geometric convergence rate for $V_{2,h}$ as well as a new lower bound for $V_2(p)$ which improves known results for $p < 0.312$. Building upon this, we improve the geometric convergence rate of $V_{2,h}$ up to the near-optimal $1/4^{1-\varepsilon}$ for any $\varepsilon > 0$. Third, we introduce and completely solve a generalization of the problem where players are given uncountably infinite stacks of hats, showing that the optimal winning probability in this setting equals exactly $1/2$ for all $n \geq 2$. This new formulation allows to study the original combinatorial problem using tools from analytic optimization, and provides a natural framework for computing optimal responses to fixed strategies.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Clément Bouquet, Salah Chikhi, Timothé Charles, Yanghao Zhou, Eric Wang. 2026-04-19. An analytical framework for the Levine hats problem: new strategies, bounds and generalizations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01737

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Matching Complexes of Outerplanar Graphs

An outerplanar graph is a planar graph that has a planar drawing with all vertices on the unbounded face. The matching complex of a graph is the simplicial complex whose faces are subsets of disjoint edges of the graph. In this paper we prove that the matching complexes of outerplanar graphs are contractible or homotopy equivalent to a wedge of spheres. This extends known results about trees and polygonal line tilings.

math.CO

Awesome graph parameters

For a graph $G$, we denote by $α(G)$ the size of a maximum independent set and by $ω(G)$ the size of a maximum clique in $G$. Our paper lies on the edge of two lines of research, related to $α$ and $ω$, respectively. One of them studies $α$-variants of graph parameters, such as $α$-treewidth or $α$-degeneracy. The second line deals with graph classes where some parameters are bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A famous example of this type is the family of $χ$-bounded classes, where the chromatic number $χ(G)$ is bounded by a function of $ω(G)$. A Ramsey-type argument implies that if the $α$-variant of a graph parameter $ρ$ is bounded by a constant in a hereditary class $\mathcal{G}$, then $ρ$ is bounded by a function of $ω$ in $\mathcal{G}$. If the reverse implication also holds, we say that $ρ$ is awesome. Otherwise, we say that $ρ$ is awful. In the present paper, we identify a number of awesome and awful graph parameters, derive some algorithmic applications of awesomeness, and propose a number of open problems related to these notions.

math.CO

Perfect matchings and $A_α$-spectral radius in 1-binding graphs

Let $G$ be a graph with vertex set $V(G)$ and edge set $E(G)$. For $α\in[0,1)$, we use $A_α(G)$ and $ρ_α(G)$ to denote the $A_α$-matrix and the $A_α$-spectral radius of $G$, respectively. The binding number $\mbox{bind}(G)$ of $G$ is defined by $\mbox{bind}(G)=\min\left\{\frac{|N_G(X)|}{|X|}:\emptyset\neq X\subseteq V(G),N_G(X)\neq V(G)\right\}$. If $\mbox{bind}(G)\geq1$, then $G$ is called 1-binding. A perfect matching in $G$ is a set of nonadjacent edges covering every vertex of $G$. Tutte proved that a graph $G$ of even order has a perfect matching if and only if $o(G-S)\leq|S|$ holds for every $S\subseteq V(G)$ [W. Tutte, The factorization of linear graphs, J. Lond. Math. Soc. 22 (1947) 107--111]. In this paper, we use Tutte's result to prove that a connected 1-binding graph $G$ of even order $n$ with $n\geq n(α)$ has a perfect matching unless $G=K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1)$ if $ρ_α(G)\geqρ_α(K_1\vee(K_{n-5}\cup K_3\cup K_1))$, where $n(α)$ is defined as follows: $n(α)=\max\{18,\frac{2+8α}{1-2α}\}$ if $α\in[0,\frac{1}{2})$, and $n(α)=18$ if $α=\frac{1}{2}$.

math.CO