Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2508.01866

Separation Logic of Generic Resources via Sheafeology

Abstract

Separation logic was conceived in order to make the verification of pointer programs scalable to large systems and it has proven extremely effective. The key idea is that programs typically access only small parts of memory, allowing for local reasoning. This idea is implemented in separation logic by extending first-order logic with separating connectives, which inspect local regions of memory. It turns that this approach not only applies to pointer programs, but also to programs involving other resource structures. Various theories have been put forward to extract and apply the ideas of separation logic more broadly. This resulted in algebraic abstractions of memory and many variants of separation logic for, e.g., concurrent programs and stochastic processes. However, none of the existing approaches formulate the combination of first-order logic with separating connectives in a theory that could immediately yield program logics for different resources. In this paper, we propose a framework based on the idea that separation logic can obtained by making first-order logic resource-aware. First-order logic can be understood in terms of categorical logic, specifically fibrations. Our contribution is to make these resource-aware by developing categorical logic internally in categories of sheaves, which is what we call sheafeology. The role of sheaves is to model views on resources, through which resources can be localised and combined, which enables the scalability promised by separation logic. We contribute constructions of an internal fibration in sheaf categories that models predicates on resources, and that admits first-order and separating connectives. Thereby, we attain a general framework of separation logic for generic resources, a claim we substantiate by instantiating our framework to various memory models and random variables.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Berend van Starkenburg, Henning Basold, Chase Ford. 2025-08-03. Separation Logic of Generic Resources via Sheafeology. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01866

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Deciding Predicate Logical Theories of Real-Valued Functions

The notion of a real-valued function is central to mathematics, computer science, and many other scientific fields. Despite this importance, there are hardly any positive results on decision procedures for predicate logical theories that reason about real-valued functions. This paper defines a first-order predicate language for reasoning about multi-dimensional smooth real-valued functions and their derivatives, and demonstrates that - despite the obvious undecidability barriers - certain positive decidability results for such a language are indeed possible.

cs.LO

Structural Liveness of Conservative Petri Nets

We show that the EXPSPACE-hardness result for structural liveness of Petri nets [Jancar and Purser, 2019] holds even for a simple subclass of conservative nets. As our main result, we prove that for structurally live conservative nets, the values of the minimal live markings are at most doubly exponential in the size of the net. This implies the EXPSPACE-completeness of structural liveness for conservative Petri nets. The result also applies to structurally bounded Petri nets, whereas the complexity of the general case remains open. As a proof ingredient of independent interest, we present an extension of known results on the bounds of minimal integer solutions to Boolean combinations of linear equalities, inequalities, and divisibility constraints.

cs.LO

Verifying Numerical Methods with Isabelle/HOL

Modern machine learning pipelines and ODE solvers are built on numerical algorithms. Reliable numerical methods are thus a prerequisite for trustworthy machine learning and cyber-physical systems. We evaluate a framework designed for verifying imperative programs and the Isabelle proof assistant as tools for proving the total correctness of four numerical algorithms: the bisection method, the fixed-point method, the perceptron, and the gradient descent algorithm. Our verifications required subtle extensions and generalisations to Isabelle's version of Taylor's theorem and higher-order derivatives. Finally, we reflect on the framework's automation, friendly syntax, and on further requirements to turn it into a verification tool for numerical methods.

cs.LO