Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2508.05919

Comparing dragonfly wings to jars of marbles through the lens of hyperuniformity

Abstract

When we look at the world around us, we see both organized (also called ordered) and disorganized (also called disordered) arrangements of things. Carefully-tiled floors and brick walls have organized and repeating patterns, but the stars in the sky and the trees in a forest look like they're arranged in a disordered way. We also see objects, like jars of marbles and the lacy wings of insects, that lie between ordered and disordered extremes. Although the marbles in a jar don't sit on a regular grid like carefully-arranged tiles, the collection of marbles does have some consistent features, such as the typical size and spacing between them. However, the positions of the marbles are much less random than the positions of the stars in the sky. To help understand and classify these patterns, mathematicians and physicists use the term hyperuniform to help them describe the situations of being perfectly organized or being disorganized in an organized way. In this article, we discuss various fascinating properties of hyperuniform patterns. We explore where they occur in the natural world and how engineers are using them to build new structures.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Karen E. Daniels, Charles Emmett Maher, Katherine A. Newhall, Mason A. Porter, Christopher Rock. 2025-08-08. Comparing dragonfly wings to jars of marbles through the lens of hyperuniformity. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.05919

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Come for the vibe, stay for the math

This article describes our experiences in mathematical outreach over the past decade. We talk about specific activities, but also general principles that we've learned along the way.

math.HO

Graduate Mathematics in the Age of AI: Forming Mathematicians for Original, Independent, and Responsible Inquiry

Artificial intelligence can increasingly produce plausible, sophisticated mathematical material faster than a developing graduate student can understand or verify it. A sophisticated result or paper draft therefore becomes weaker evidence of the student's own mathematical development. This creates a formation gap between output and personal capacity, and a trust gap between a convincing argument and warranted acceptance. The formation gap can persist even when the student understands the output: understanding a supplied argument does not by itself establish the capacity to initiate and direct inquiry. These gaps are not the whole story. AI can also help students explore examples, compare approaches, enter unfamiliar areas, and undertake ambitious research. The task is to design an apprenticeship that realizes these possibilities while developing substantive mathematical command. The central purpose of a mathematics PhD is to form mathematicians capable of original, independent, and responsible inquiry, including inquiry conducted with AI. This document develops that objective through four connected capacities: competence, judgment, independence, and responsibility. It distinguishes a work's contribution to mathematics from the evidence it provides of a student's formation; explains how a known answer can initiate rather than end creative inquiry; and proposes changes in learning activities, assessment, doctoral originality, advising, and institutional support. Purposeful independent work and ambitious AI-assisted research are complementary parts of the model. Its recommendations include proportionate contribution statements, recognition of advising costs, and staged pilots evaluating both mathematical ability and effective human--AI collaboration. The aim is not to preserve an inherited sequence of training, but to improve mathematical formation as mathematical practice changes.

math.HO