Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2508.06460

A Simple PTAS for Weighted $k$-means and Sensor Coverage

Abstract

Clustering is a fundamental technique in data analysis, with the $k$-means being one of the widely studied objectives due to its simplicity and broad applicability. In many practical scenarios, data points come with associated weights that reflect their importance, frequency, or confidence. Given a weighted point set $P \subset R^d$, where each point $p \in P$ has a positive weight $w_p$, the goal is to compute a set of $k$ centers $C = \{ c_1, c_2, \ldots, c_k \} \subset R^d$ that minimizes the weighted clustering cost: $Δ_w(P,C) = \sum_{p \in P} w_p \cdot d(p,C)^2$, where $d(p,C)$ denotes the Euclidean distance from $p$ to its nearest center in $C$. Although most existing coreset-based algorithms for $k$-means extend naturally to the weighted setting and provide a PTAS, no prior work has offered a simple, coreset-free PTAS designed specifically for the weighted $k$-means problem. In this paper, we present a simple PTAS for weighted $k$-means that does not rely on coresets. Building upon the framework of Jaiswal, Kumar, and Sen (2012) for the unweighted case, we extend the result to the weighted setting by using the weighted $D^2$-sampling technique. Our algorithm runs in time $n d \cdot 2^{O\left(\frac{k^2}ε\right)}$ and outputs a set of $k$ centers whose total clustering cost is within a $(1 + ε)$-factor of the optimal cost. As a key application of the weighted $k$-means, we obtain a PTAS for the sensor coverage problem, which can also be viewed as a continuous locational optimization problem. For this problem, the best-known result prior to our work was an $O(\log k)$-approximation by Deshpande (2014), whereas our algorithm guarantees a $(1 + ε)$-approximation to the optimal coverage cost even before applying refinement steps like Lloyd desent.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Akash Pareek, Supratim Shit. 2025-08-08. A Simple PTAS for Weighted $k$-means and Sensor Coverage. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.06460

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Beyond Kruskal: Polynomial-Time Tensor Decomposition under the Lovitz-Petrov Condition

Identifiability criteria certify that a given tensor decomposition is a unique rank decomposition. Kruskal's classical condition is one of the best-known deterministic criteria for identifiability. However, no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm is known under the Kruskal condition, and verifying the condition itself is NP-hard. Lovitz and Petrov introduced a strictly more general identifiability condition which, in contrast, is polynomial-time verifiable, but no polynomial-time decomposition algorithm was previously known under this condition. We give a polynomial-time algorithm for tensor decomposition under the Lovitz--Petrov condition. Moreover, combining our algorithm with polynomial-time verification of the Lovitz--Petrov condition yields an efficient end-to-end certification procedure: after computing a decomposition, one can deterministically certify in polynomial time that it is unique and therefore of minimum rank. This contrasts with an arbitrary tensor decomposition, which certifies only an upper bound on the tensor rank, while determining tensor rank is NP-hard in general.

cs.DS

Poisson Exchange Beyond Submodularity: Effective Approximation Algorithms for Offline and Online Subset Selection over Matroids

Over the past decade, a growing body of research has shown that $γ$-weak submodularity broadly arises in numerous subset selection tasks, including feature selection, neural network pruning, and video summarization. Despite its prevalence, maximizing a $γ$-weakly submodular function subject to a general matroid constraint remains challenging. To date, the only known approximation guarantee is the conservative $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ factor established by \citet{chen2018weakly}. To improve upon this result, this paper proposes a novel algorithm called \MGPE, which repeatedly performs maximum-gain local exchanges through careful control of a non-homogeneous Poisson clock, and proves that this \MGPE\ can attain an approximation ratio arbitrarily close to $ρ_γ=1-\left(γ/(2-γ)\right)^{ \frac{γ^2}{2(1-γ)} }$. In sharp contrast to the previous guarantee, our obtained factor $ρ_γ$ not only strictly improves upon $(1+1/γ)^{-2}$ for every $γ\in(0,1]$, but also can asymptotically approach the optimal $(1-1/e)$-approximation for submodular maximization as $γ\to1$. Furthermore, we surprisingly find that when the matroid constraint reduces to a cardinality or the objective satisfies the stronger notion of $α$-weak DR-submodularity, \MGPE\ can automatically recover the tight approximation ratios of $1-e^{-γ}$ and $1-e^{-α}$, respectively. Here, $α\in(0,1]$ denotes the DR ratio.

cs.DS

Approximating Prize-Collecting TSP below 1.556

The prize-collecting traveling salesperson problem is a variant of the metric traveling salesperson problem in which vertices may be left unvisited by paying their associated penalties. The objective is to minimize the length of the tour plus the total penalty of the unvisited vertices. Blauth, Klein, and Nägele gave the previously best-known LP-relative $1.599$-approximation. We show that a simpler version of their algorithm, obtained by omitting the splitting-off preprocessing before the tree decomposition, has an LP-relative approximation ratio of $1.555761$. The improvement comes entirely from a new analysis of the parity-correction step: a simple analysis already gives $1.56$, and the stated factor follows from a numerical parameter search with exact verification.

cs.DS