Search arXiv⌕ Search

arXiv · 2508.10303

DiffAxE: Diffusion-driven Hardware Accelerator Generation and Design Space Exploration

Abstract

Design space exploration (DSE) is critical for developing optimized hardware architectures, especially for AI workloads such as deep neural networks (DNNs) and large language models (LLMs), which require specialized acceleration. As model complexity grows, accelerator design spaces have expanded to O(10^17), becoming highly irregular, non-convex, and exhibiting many-to-one mappings from design configurations to performance metrics. This complexity renders direct inverse derivation infeasible and necessitates heuristic or sampling-based optimization. Conventional methods - including Bayesian optimization, gradient descent, reinforcement learning, and genetic algorithms - depend on iterative sampling, resulting in long runtimes and sensitivity to initialization. Deep learning-based approaches have reframed DSE as classification using recommendation models, but remain limited to small-scale (O(10^3)), less complex design spaces. To overcome these constraints, we propose a generative approach that models hardware design as 1-D image synthesis conditioned on target performance, enabling efficient learning of non-differentiable, non-bijective hardware-performance mappings. Our framework achieves 0.86% lower generation error than Bayesian optimization with a 17000x speedup, and outperforms GANDSE with 30% lower error at only 1.83x slower search. We further extend the method to a structured DSE setting, attaining 9.8% lower energy-delay product (EDP) and 6% higher performance, with up to 145.6x and 1312x faster search compared to existing optimization methods on O(10^17) design spaces. For LLM inference, our method achieves 3.37x and 7.75x lower EDP on a 32nm ASIC and Xilinx Ultrascale+ VPU13 FPGA, respectively, compared to the state-of-the-art DOSA framework.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Arkapravo Ghosh, Abhishek Moitra, Abhiroop Bhattacharjee, Ruokai Yin, Priyadarshini Panda. 2026-07-20. DiffAxE: Diffusion-driven Hardware Accelerator Generation and Design Space Exploration. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10303

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Implementation and Evaluation of NTT Arithmetic for ML-KEM on a CGLA

FIPS 203 standardizes ML-KEM for post-quantum key establishment. Its polynomial multiplication relies on NTT butterflies with exact modular arithmetic over q = 3329. Dedicated NTT accelerators minimize latency with fixed modular arithmetic and stage schedules. A CPU-Grounded Linear Array (CGLA) reuses one programmable linear datapath across several workloads. Mapping the transform to this datapath requires exact FP32 reconstruction and explicit stage transitions across the ARM-to-CGLA interface. We implement an eight-stage cyclic radix-2 driver over the ML-KEM modulus by splitting each twiddle into 8-bit and 4-bit parts before modular reduction. This driver differs from the standardized seven-layer incomplete negacyclic NTT and does not implement the full ML-KEM polynomial multiplication path. The arithmetic sequence keeps every integer below 2^24. One 41-PE call fuses the first two radix-2 stages, and six 47-PE calls execute the remaining stages while scattering outputs into next-stage records. Across four cohorts, 105 FPGA runs match all 817152 output coefficients. At batch size 64, measured FPGA end-to-end latency is 27.5 us per NTT, and the ASIC projection is 6.74 us. With PE gating, projected ASIC system energy is 10.1 uJ per NTT at batch size 8 and 58.9 uJ at batch size 64.

cs.AR↗

HBF-Sim: An Extensible HBF Simulator for Large-scale GPU Memory Systems

High-bandwidth flash (HBF) is introduced to address the memory wall, which can co-package a dense NAND stack with the GPU, targeting the performance gap between near-accelerator bandwidth and flash density. HBF, however, is neither a large HBM nor a fast NVMe SSD. Its usable bandwidth depends on how GPU cache-line requests map onto NAND pages, how concurrency spreads across channel-affine die sets, and how media management interacts with the GPU memory pipeline. To our knowledge, existing GPU, SSD, or HBF simulators cannot faithfully model this behavior. We present HBF-Sim, an extensible, reusable, and faithful HBF simulator integrated with simulated GPUs. It closes the loop between GPU issue limits, device queuing, and NAND behavior in one end-to-end request path. HBF-Sim separates a GPU-HBF interaction controller from page-based parallel stack storage, and it models the full GPU-HBF request path. It provides an MSHR-based address mapping table that merges cache-line requests into page-based operations, as well as a page-based multi-stack flash manager for highly parallel reads and writes. Validation tests and device-level microbenchmarks expose performance bottlenecks caused by limited channel distribution and resource conflicts, offering concrete guidance for next-generation HBF architectures.

cs.AR↗

VQ-LIC: Shared Vector-Quantized Learned Image Compression on a Resource-Constrained FPGA

Learned image compression (LIC) is hard to deploy on severely resource-constrained FPGAs, since how fast it actually runs depends not just on arithmetic count, but also on memory traffic, imbalance between different operations, and how the hardware batches its work. We present VQ-LIC, an asymmetric edge-cloud codec in which a compact INT8 depthwise (DW)-pointwise (PW) analysis transform and multi-codebook vector quantization (VQ) run at the edge on a reusable DW/PW engine pair, while reconstruction is handled by a larger cloud decoder. Since VQ codeword matching is expressible as a dot product, it is mapped directly onto the same PW engine, removing the need for a separate VQ compute array, to our knowledge a first for FPGA LIC. A novel latency model, derived from deterministic RTL cycle counts of an FPGA's read, DW, PW, and write costs, predicts an analysis transform's per-block latency; since VQ shares the same PW datapath, the model applies to VQ as well. Validated directly against silicon, the model predicts deployed analysis and VQ latency within 0.26\% and 0.05\%, and guides the selection of a three-block $16$-$48$-$64$ transform. Post-training codebook reduction then cuts VQ arithmetic and codebook storage by $4\times$ and shrinks the fixed-width latent representation. On a 220-DSP Zynq-7020, VQ-LIC's mid-rate preset reaches 0.1398 bits per pixel at 28.69 dB PSNR and 13.06 dB MS-SSIM on CLIC~2017, outperforming a similarly sized neural encoder and reaching a rate-distortion range comparable to a codec three orders of magnitude larger. The complete 0.1945-kMAC/pixel analysis-VQ pipeline runs at 47.98 frames per second and 42.84 mJ per frame on silicon, using an order of magnitude fewer DSPs than comparable FPGA LIC accelerators while achieving lower bitrate, higher throughput, and lower energy per frame at a modest PSNR tradeoff.

cs.AR↗