Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2508.12454

Evaluating sugarcane bagasse-based biochar as an economically viable catalyst for agricultural and environmental advancement in Brazil through scenario-based economic modeling

Abstract

The increasing global demand for sustainable agricultural practices and effective waste management has highlighted the potential of biochar as a multifaceted solution. This study evaluates the economic viability of sugarcane bagasse-based biochar in Brazil, focusing on its potential to enhance agricultural productivity and contribute to environmental sustainability. While existing literature predominantly explores the production, crop yield benefits, and carbon sequestration capabilities of biochar, there is a notable gap in comprehensive economic modeling and viability analysis for the region. This paper aims to fill this gap by employing a scenario-based economic modeling approach, incorporating relevant economic models. Findings include that biochar implementation can be economically viable for medium and large sugarcane farms (20000-50000 hectares) given the availability of funding, breaking even in about 7.5 years with an internal rate of return of 18% on average. For small farms, biochar can only be viable when applying biochar to the soil, which in all scenarios is found to be the more profitable practice by a large margin. Sensitivity analyses found that generally, biochar becomes economically feasible at biochar carbon credit prices above $120 USD/tCO2e, and at sugarcane bagasse availability percentages above 60%. While the economic models are well-grounded in existing literature, the production of biochar at the studied scales is not yet widespread, especially in Brazil and uncertainties can result. Reviewing the results, the land application scenario was found to be the most viable, and large farms saw the best results, highlighting the importance of scale to biochar operation. Small and medium farms with no land application were concluded to have no and questionable viability, respectively.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Sebastian G. Nosenzo. 2025-08-17. Evaluating sugarcane bagasse-based biochar as an economically viable catalyst for agricultural and environmental advancement in Brazil through scenario-based economic modeling. https://doi.org/10.4236/jpee.2024.1211007

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Decomposing Wage Stagnation: Employment Reallocation, Wage Structure,and Demographics

Japan's average log real hourly wages rose until the mid-1990s, declined through the mid-2010s, and partially recovered thereafter. This paper decomposes these changes over 1980-2024 into four components: demographic change across worker types, changes in relative employment shares across job types, changes in relative log wages across job types, and unweighted mean wage growth. The framework combines a shift-share decomposition across worker types with an extension of the Olley-Pakes decomposition across job types within worker types, separating employment reallocation from changes in relative wage structure. The four components vary across periods. Before 1996, unweighted mean wage growth and changes in relative wage structure contribute positively, while demographic change and employment reallocation contribute negatively. During 1996-2014, all four components are negative. After 2014, the recovery mainly reflects unweighted mean wage growth. Employment reallocation and changes in relative wage structure contribute differently across dimensions of job type.

econ.GN

Complements or Substitutes? Technology Adoption and Clinical Care Utilization: Evidence from Automated Insulin Delivery

Whether medical technology reduces or increases demand for professional care is central to understanding its effects on healthcare utilization and costs. We study automated insulin delivery (AID) adoption among 1,608 adults with type 1 diabetes treated in four specialist clinics of the Italian National Health Service, 283 of whom adopt AID. Because adoption is clinically targeted and staggered, we combine risk-set coarsened exact matching with a staggered event-study design. Matching retains 181 adopters with comparable untreated controls. We further adjust for differential pre-adoption trends by extrapolating the untreated trajectory in event time. After adjustment, AID adoption is associated with greater routine outpatient engagement. The estimated effect on the probability of a diabetologist visit is 16.3 percentage points one semester after adoption and 39.3 percentage points four semesters after adoption, relative to a 55.2% visit probability in the semester before adoption. HbA1c testing and a broader process-of-care index show similar positive patterns, although the evidence is less precise. The visit estimates remain sensitive to the trend-extrapolation assumption and should therefore be interpreted conditionally on that restriction. The findings are consistent with a task-based view in which automation substitutes for routine dosing decisions while complementing clinical labor through interpretive, adjustment, and supervisory tasks. Patient-facing automation may therefore reorganize rather than simply reduce healthcare use.

econ.GN

Mining Meaning: Measurement Error in AI-Assisted Literature Reviews

Researchers increasingly use generative AI, particularly large language models (LLMs), to automate tasks across the research pipeline. We study the reliability of these tools at the reading, classification, and synthesis of large bodies of academic literature. We frame LLM-assisted literature reviews as a measurement problem, treating models as measurement systems and tracing how their errors affect downstream conclusions. As a test case, we use three different implementations of ChatGPT to identify and extract metadata from economics papers that use rainfall as an instrumental variable. We benchmark each implementation against a subset of human-labeled evaluation data, and then deploy those implementations to extract metadata from the full corpus. The LLMs perform well on binary classification, but performance deteriorates as tasks demand greater contextual interpretation. More importantly, how much researchers can rely on model outputs depends not only on the complexity of the reading task but also on the type of claims the data is asked to support. The same amount of measurement error substantially affects paper-level claims while having little effect on broader claims about the literature. Measurement error in LLM-generated data is thus most consequential at precisely the level of detail that constitutes an LLM's principal value added over human reviewers. We conclude that standard model performance metrics are informative about the quality of generated data but do not by themselves establish the credibility of downstream inference. Researchers must also evaluate whether substantive claims are robust to the measurement system used to generate the underlying data.

econ.GN