Search arXiv⌕ Search
Home/Archive/arXiv

arXiv · 2508.14538

Hamiltonian Cycles in Simplicial and Supersolvable Hyperplane Arrangements

Veronika Körber·Tobias Schnieders·Jan Stricker·Jasmin Walizadeh
View original source ↗Read source document ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Motivated by the Gray code interpretation of Hamiltonian cycles in Cayley graphs, we investigate the existence of Hamiltonian cycles in tope graphs of hyperplane arrangements, with a focus on simplicial, reflection, and supersolvable arrangements. We confirm Hamiltonicity for all 3-dimensional simplicial arrangements listed in the Grünbaum--Cuntz catalogue. Extending earlier results by Conway, Sloane, and Wilks, we prove that all restrictions of finite reflection arrangements, including all Weyl groupoids and crystallographic arrangements, admit Hamiltonian cycles. Finally, we further establish that all supersolvable hyperplane arrangements and supersolvable oriented matroids have Hamiltonian cycles, offering a constructive proof based on their inductive structure.

Explore related subjects

math.CO

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Veronika Körber, Tobias Schnieders, Jan Stricker, Jasmin Walizadeh. 2026-04-09. Hamiltonian Cycles in Simplicial and Supersolvable Hyperplane Arrangements. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.14538

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

arXiv2026

Adjunctions, Box Products, and Forcing Families

Sidorenko's conjecture states that the number of copies of any given bipartite graph in another graph of given density is asymptotically minimized by a random graph. For bipartite graphs containing a cycle, the forcing conjecture further asserts that asymptotic equality characterizes quasi-random graphs. We establish an adjoint identity for a general class of graph-substitution operators and use it to obtain Sidorenko and forcing results for balanced blow-ups, subdivisions, Cartesian products, and strong products.

math.CO↗
arXiv2026

On the Cost Number of Graphs with Determining Number Two

A distinguishing vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is a vertex coloring such that only the identity automorphism of $G$ preserves the coloring. A graph is $2$-distinguishable if it admits a distinguishing vertex coloring with two colors, and its cost $ρ(G)$ is the minimum size of a color class in such a coloring. The determining number of a graph $G$, denoted by $Det(G)$, is the minimum size of a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ such that only the trivial automorphism fixes every element of $S$ pointwise. Boutin (J. Combin. Math. Combin. Comput. 85: 161-171, 2013) asked if $ρ(G)$ and $Det(G)$ can be arbitrarily far apart. While the case for $Det(G) = 1$ is trivial, the answer remained unknown for $Det(G) \ge 2$. In this manuscript, we show that if $Det(G)=2$ then not only is $ρ(G)$ bounded, but in fact $ρ(G) \leq 4$. This is the first resolution of Boutin's question for any nontrivial fixed determining number. Moreover, for every fixed $Det(G)= n$, we construct examples giving a lower bound on any possible upper bound for $ρ(G)$ in terms of $n$.

math.CO↗