Search arXivSearch

arXiv · 2508.15355

Time-consistent catastrophe risk management under the path-dependent effects

Abstract

This paper investigates optimal investment and insurance strategies under a mean-variance criterion with path-dependent effects. We use a rough volatility model with a power kernel and a Hawkes process with a modified Omori kernel (a power kernel) to capture the market's path dependence. By extending the functional Ito calculus to the mixed fractional Brownian-Hawkes process, we derive the corresponding path-dependent extended Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation and solve its explicit solution. For numerical analysis, we first calibrate the Hawkes process with the Wenchuan earthquake data, the most devastating earthquake in China. We find that the power kernel outperforms the exponential one in fitting the earthquake intensity. Our numerical results reveal that the path-dependent effect strongly depends on the horizon length. For the investment strategy, the individual is more risk-seeking when considering the rougher volatility in the short horizon, but more risk-averse at the beginning of the long horizon. For the insurance strategy, a faster decay in intensity increases individuals' demand for catastrophe insurance in the short horizon, but decreases initially in the long horizon. However, we find that the horizon effect may disappear when the shift parameter in the modified Omori kernel approaches zero or exceeds one. Our findings indicate that ignoring path-dependent effects would lead to significant underinsurance and highlight its importance in catastrophe risk management.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Liyuan Cui, Wenyuan Li. 2026-07-08. Time-consistent catastrophe risk management under the path-dependent effects. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.15355

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related papers

Dynamic reinsurance via martingale transport

We formulate a dynamic reinsurance problem in which the insurer seeks to satisfy prescribed terminal moment or risk-based constraints while minimizing the $L^2$-norm of the ceded risk. As a tool for this analysis, we first use techniques from martingale optimal transport to study the auxiliary problem in which the insurer matches a given terminal distribution of the surplus process. We show that, under suitable assumptions, this auxiliary problem admits a tractable solution analogous to the Bass martingale. We then relax this condition by only requiring certain moment or risk-based constraints.

q-fin.RM

Risk Measures under Paired-Ambiguity: A Deep Learning Reflected BSDE Framework

We study optimal stopping under dynamic risk measures with simultaneous ambiguity in the probability model and the discount rate. We introduce a paired ambiguity framework combining Girsanov model uncertainty with cash subadditive risk evaluation and characterize the stopping value by an upper reflected backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE). We establish structural properties of the resulting stopping operator and study quadratic drivers associated with entropic risk measures, obtaining explicit stopping rules in several benchmark cases. We then develop a deep learning scheme for the reflected quadratic BSDE. The convergence analysis uses discrete reflection and truncation to reduce the quadratic problem to a globally Lipschitz system and combines reflected BSDE discretization estimates with neural network approximation errors. Numerical experiments for American options illustrate the effects of discount rate and entropic ambiguity on stopping values and exercise decisions.

q-fin.RM

When Is the Gini Loading More Prudent? Tail Structure and the Ordering of the Standard Deviation and the Gini Mean Difference

The standard deviation (SD) and the Gini mean difference (GMD) are the two canonical measures of variability used to load premiums, set risk margins and allocate capital, yet no universal ordering between them exists. We show that the comparison is \emph{equivalent} to asking whether the coefficient of variation of the spacing $|X-X'|$ generated by two independent copies of the risk exceeds unity, so that the exponential law -- whose spacing is again exponential -- is the universal knife-edge separating the two regimes. Reading the GMD as twice the maxiance, that is, as a second-order \emph{dual} moment in the sense of Yaari's dual theory, the problem becomes an explicit comparison of primal and dual second-order variability. We derive a closed-form representation of the mean excess function of the spacing in terms of the hazard and reverse hazard rates of $X$, and use it to prove that heavy-tailed behavior -- a decreasing hazard rate or an increasing reverse hazard rate -- yields SD dominance, whereas two-sided light tails yield GMD dominance; within the monotone aging classes, equality characterizes the exponential law. Both regimes are stable under truncation, convolution and mixing, which makes them operational in collective risk and frailty models. We classify the severity, lifetime and frequency distributions of actuarial practice accordingly, quantify the consequences for SD- and Gini-loaded premium principles and for Gini-type tail risk measures, and show that the sign of $\mathrm{SD}-\mathrm{GMD}$ across thresholds furnishes a simple diagnostic for tail aging.

q-fin.RM